Library
|
Your profile |
Politics and Society
Reference:
Popov, E. A.
Features of Sociological Research of Higher Education
Quality Assessed by the Main Actors of Educational
Process
// Politics and Society.
2012. ¹ 11.
P. 54-61.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=53977
Popov, E. A. Features of Sociological Research of Higher Education Quality Assessed by the Main Actors of Educational ProcessAbstract: For quite a long time education has been the center of attention in different spheres of sociohumanitarian studies. As a social institution, education is mostly viewed from the point of view of social studies. But todays interest for the educational system is also caused by the fact that education is interpreted as a value which plays an important role for human and society. At the present article we pay attention at particularities of social research of higher education quality. The author focuses on viewing higher education quality from the point of view of modernization of a Russian system of education. The author also underlines that when studying the quality of education at institutions and universities, it is necessary to pay attention at laws and standards regulating the system and the actors of educational process. Special attention is paid at assessment of the main actors of educational process. The results of the study can be used for further development of methodology for the purpose of social researches of education quality. Keywords: social studies, education, quality, society, expert, survey, matrix, modernization, strategy, potential.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Balobanova E.G. Kachestvo obrazovaniya kak ob'ekt empiricheskikh issledovaniy// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya.-2008.-¹ 1.-S. 186-189.
2. Galagan A.I. Obrazovanie dlya vsekh: retrospektivnyy analiz tseley, strategiy i rezul'tatov// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya.-2006.-¹ 6.-S. 204-220. 3. Galinovskiy A.L. Perspektivy povysheniya kachestva obrazovatel'nogo protsessa v aspiranture fiziko-tekhnicheskogo profilya za schet informirovanno-analiticheskogo obespecheniya // Otkrytoe obrazovanie.-2006.-¹ 1.-S. 29-34. 4. Guruzhapov V.A. Problema razvitiya professional'nykh kompetentsiy budushchikh spetsialistov// Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie.-2008. ¹ 2.-S. 5-7 5. Devyatova S.V. Kakim dolzhno byt' sovremennoe obrazovanie?// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnoe znanie.-2006.-¹ 5.-S. 64-79. 6. Zborovskiy G.E. Obrazovanie kak resurs informatsionnogo obshchestva/ G.E. Zborovskiy, E.A. Shuklina// Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya.-2005. ¹ 7.-S. 107-113. 7. Zeer E.F. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod k obrazovaniyu // 8. http://www.urorao.ru/kont2005.php?mode=and exmod= zeer 9. Komardina L.S. Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva organizatsiy obrazovaniya// Vnutrivuzovskie sistemy obespecheniya kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov: materialy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii.-Krasnoyarsk: GOU VPO «GATsMiZ», 2003.-C. 36-38. 10. Kuz'minov Ya.I. Universitety v Rossii i v Amerike: razlichiya akademicheskikh konventsiy/ Ya.I Kuz'minov, M.M. Yudkevich // Voprosy obrazovaniya.-2007.-¹ 4.-S. 141-158. 11. Mindibekova A.A. Ob issledovanii sistemy obrazovaniya v sotsiologii// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnoe znanie .-2005.-¹ 5.-S. 216-227. 12. Muzyakov S.I. Tsennostnye osnovaniya modernizatsii vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya v Rossii // Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya. 2007.-¹ 2.-S.4-11. 13. Popov A.I. Formirovanie tvorcheskoy kompetentnosti spetsialista v usloviyakh olimpiadnogo dvizheniya // Otkrytoe obrazovanie.-2005. ¹ 6.-S.23-30. 14. Prokhorova E.A. Organizatsionno-pedagogicheskie aspekty upravleniya kachestvom obrazovaniya na urovne fakul'teta/ E.A. Prokhorova, N.A. Rusakova// Kachestvo obrazovaniya: sistemy upravleniya, dostizheniya, problemy: Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii/ Pod obshch. red. A.S. Vostrikova.-Novosibirsk: Izdvo NGTU, 2003.-Tom II.-S. 190-193. 15. Servatinskiy V. O formirovanii sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva obrazovatel'nykh uslug // Vnutrivuzovskie sistemy obespecheniya kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov: materialy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii.-Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo GATsMiZ, 2003.-S. 21-24. 16. Tret'yakov O.B. Potentsial'noe kachestvo obrazovaniya// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya.-2006.-¹ 3.-S. 49-64. 17. Filatova M.N. Obrazovatel'nom protsesse: tseli, printsipy, tekhnologii/ M.N. Filatova, L.V. Volkova// Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya.-2007.-¹ 9. S. 4-15. 18. Khoukht A. Kachestvo obrazovaniya v Velikobritanii: voprosy doveriya, kontrolya, professional'noy avtonomnosti i podotchetnosti // Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya.-2006.-¹ 10.-S. 63-66. 19. Shcheglov P.E. Kachestvo vysshego obrazovaniya. Riski pri podgotovke spetsialistov/ P.E Shcheglov, N.Sh. Nikitina// Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz.-2003.-¹3.-S. 23-29. 20. Yadov V.A. Strategiya sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya: opisanie, ob'yasnenie, ponimanie sotsial'noy deystvitel'nosti.-M.: Dobrosvet, 2003.-596 s. 21. http://www.complexdoc.ru/scan/ 22. Weiss H. Education quality system at the university of Leoben // Kachestvo obrazovaniya: sistemy upravleniya, dostizheniya, problemy: materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii/ Pod obshch. red. A.S. Vostrikova.-Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGTU, 2003.-Tom II.-C. 181-186 |