|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Politics and Society
Reference:
Artemieva, Yu. A. (2012). Defi nition and Elements of the Claim for Protection of Rights and Interests of General
Public in Tax Disputes. Politics and Society, 3, 99–105. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=53875
Artemieva, Yu. A. Defi nition and Elements of the Claim for Protection of Rights and Interests of General Public in Tax DisputesAbstract: The article is devoted to the research of claims for protection of rights and legal interests of general public different from traditional claims for protection of rights of a concrete entity. The author of the article proves that a direct asset to be protected when proceeding a claim for protection of rights an interests of general public is the interest of the society in implementation of certain policy including tax policy aimed at protection of life, health and well-being of citizens in the first place. Keywords: studies of law, claim, general public, taxes, disputes, taxpayer, rights, interests, protection of rights, social interest.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Vikut M. A. Storony – osnovnye litsa iskovogo proizvodstva.- Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo un-ta, 1968.-
2. 76 s. 3. Zhurbin B.A. Protsessual'nye osobennosti rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del o zashchite gruppy lits po 4. korporativnym sporam // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2011.– ¹4.-S. 32-42. 5. Mel'nikov A. A. Pravovoe polozhenie lichnosti v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse: Avtoref. dis… d-ra. 6. yurid. nauk.-M., 1970.- 31s. 7. Shcheglov V. N. Sub'ekty sudebnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa. Tomsk: Tomskiy gosuniversitet 1979.– 128 s. 8. Chechet D. M. Uchastniki grazhdanskogo protsessa. M., Gosyurizdat.– 1960.– 192 s. 9. Shakaryan M. S. Sub'ekty sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava.- M.: VYuZI.1970.– 212 s. 10. Bataeva N.S. Sudebnaya zashchita prav i interesov neopredelennogo kruga lits: Dis… kand.yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. 11. – M., 1998. –164 s. 12. Popova Yu.A. Sudoproizvodstvo po delam, voznikayushchim iz publichno-pravovykh otnosheniy (teoreticheskie 13. problemy). Krasnodar.: KGAU, 2002 – S.99. 14. Polukhova E. Zashchita prav i zakonnykh interesov neopredelennogo kruga lits v krupnykh ob'edineniyakh pred- 15. priyatiy // Zakonnost'. – 2005. – ¹7. – S.28-30. 16. Federal'nyy zakon “O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii” ot 17 yanvarya 1992 g. N 2202-1 //Vedomosti 17. S'ezda narodnykh deputatov Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiyskoy Federatsii.– 1992.– 18. N 8.– st. 366. 19. Grazhdanskiy protsese: Uchebnik / Otv. red. prof.. V.V.Yarkov. - 5-oe izd., pererab. i dop. - M.: Volters Kluver, 20. 2004. – 720s. 21. Strogovich m.S. O sisteme nauki sudebnogo prava / Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1939. -¹3.– s.66-67. 22. Bokov D.K. Diskussionnye voprosy pred'yavleniya prokurorom grazhdanskogo iska v ugolovnom protsesse v 23. zashchitu interesov gosudarstva //Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava.– 2011.– ¹1.-S. 68. 24. Yarkov V.V. Novye formy iskovoy zashchity v grazhdanskom protsesse (gruppovye i kosvennye iski) // 25. Gosudarstvo i pravo – 1999 – ¹9 – s. 32-40. 26. Abolonin G. O. Gruppovye iski v zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoy praktike SShA // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy 27. zhurnal - 1997- ¹1– s.144- 147. 28. O dopuske tsennykh bumag k ofitsial'nomu listingu na fondovoy birzhe i ob informatsii, kotoraya dolzhna 29. byt' opublikovannaya ob etikh tsennykh bumagakh: Direktiva 2001/34/?S Evropeyskogo Parlamenta i Soveta ot 30. 28 maya 2001 goda // Ofitsial'nyy zhurnal - C 116 - 2001 – S. 69-70. |
© 1998 – 2025 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
