|
Politics and Society
Reference:
Razin, A. S., Belov, A. V.
Forms, Types and Legal Framework of Social Responsibility
// Politics and Society.
2012. ¹ 3.
P. 4-12.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=53864
Razin, A. S., Belov, A. V. Forms, Types and Legal Framework of Social Responsibility
Abstract:
The article is devoted to transformation of social responsibility according to development of the society. On one
hand, it led to establishment of the mechanisms helping to avoid diffusion of collective responsibility and on the other
hand, it resulted in differentiation of forms of responsibility and creation of the mechanisms of institutional support.
Keywords:
philosophy, law, system of values, deed, moral responsibility, social responsibility, corporate responsibility, civil responsibility, legal responsibility, consciousness.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Alekseeva T.A. Lichnost' i politika v perekhodnyy period: problemy legitimnosti vlasti // Voprosy
2. filosofii, 1998. - ¹7. - S.58-65
3. Arkhangel'skiy L.M.. Individual'noe soznanie i moral'nye tsennosti // Voprosy filosofii, ¹7,
4. 1995.
5. Buslov K.P. Sotsial'noe edinstvo, protivorechiya, otvetstvennost'… Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika, 1972.
6. Ivanov R.L.. Nekotorye voprosy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti.// Vestnik Omskogo universiteta, 1998,
7. Vyp. 1. S. 94-97.
8. Kleyner B.I. Sotsial'naya prichinnost', ee priroda i spetsifika. – M.:Vysshaya shkola, 1991 g., 128 s.
9. Kozlova N.P. Kontseptsiya moral'noy otvetstvennosti v filosofii G.Yonasa. Vestnik Moskovskogo uni-
10. versiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. ¹2. 2006. S. 71-82.
11. Orekhovskiy A.I. Vvedenie v filosofiyu otvetstvennosti.– Novosibirsk: SibGUTI, 2005.- 186 s.
12. Pazina, O. E. Obshchestvennye otnosheniya kak ob'ekt sotsial'nogo kontrolya i otvetstvennosti. //
13. Chelovek v kontekste svoego vremeni: opyt istoriko-psikhologicheskogo osmysleniya: materialy KhKh-oy
14. Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii: v 3-kh t. T. 3 / Sankt-Peterburgskiy gos. un-t. – SPb., 2006. – S.
15. 171-173.
16. Pazina, O. E. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak vid sotsial'noy otvetstvennosti. // Voprosy teorii
17. i praktiki Rossiyskoy pravovoy nauki: III-'ya Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya /
18. Penzenskiy gos. pedagogich. un-t im. V. G. Belinskogo. – Penza, 2007. – S. 217-220.
19. Pazina, O. E. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo regulirovaniya ekologicheskikh pravootnoshe-
20. niy // Ekologiya i zhizn': KhII-aya Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya / Penzenskiy in-t
21. otkrytogo obrazovaniya. – Penza, 2007. – S. 110-113.
22. Razin, A.S. Ekonomicheskaya etika v strukture eticheskogo znaniya // Filosofiya sotsial'nykh kommunika-
23. tsiy / A.S. Razin, Zh.V. Roslyakova – 2011. -¹4 (17), - S. 78-87.
24. Solodkaya, M. S. Moral'no-eticheskaya otvetstvennost' sub'ekta upravleniya [Elektronnyy resurs] / M.
25. S. Solodkaya. – 2007. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.orenburg.ru/culture/credo/11/3.html. – Zagl. s ekrana.
26. Spenser G. Opyty nauchnye, politicheskie i filosofskie. Minsk, 1999 g. S. 1072.
27. Filosofiya. Kratkiy tematicheskiy slovar'. - Rostov n/D: «Feniks», 2001. - 416 s
28. Frederik R., Petri E. Delovaya etika i filosofskiy pragmatizm //Voprosy filosofii. — 1996. ¹3.
29. Gehlen, A. Moral und Hypermoral / A. Gehlen. – Frankfurt am Main: Athenaeum Verlag, 1973. – 151p.
30. Noros, W. The crisis of responsibility: man as the source of accountability / by William Horosz. – Norman:
31. University of Oklahoma Press, 1975. – xvi, 324 p.
32. Mckeon, R. The Development and Signifi cance of the Concept of Responsibility / R. Mckeon // Revue Internationale
33. de Philosophie. – 1957. – ¹39. – P. 3-32.
|