Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Popov, E. A. Sociological Analysis of the Role of Administrative Institution in Ensuring Qualifi ed Higher Education

Abstract: The article provides empiric data about a research conducted at one of the universities in Siberia. The purpose of the study was to receive results related to the infl uence of administrative structure of universities on lectures, i.e. quality of education in general. The study involved representatives of rector’s offi ce as well as dean’s offi ces and university departments. As a result of sociological interpretation of received data, the author fi nds out that unequal allocation of students between faculties infl uencing low or high quality of education, is quite signifi cant. The purpose of the article is to create a whole picture about the role of administrative structure of a university and raise of education quality. The main method of the research was the students’ survey.

Keywords:

social studies, education, values, quality, management, structure, rector’s offi ce, department, administration, social skills.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Balobanova E.G. Kachestvo obrazovaniya kak ob'ekt empiricheskikh issledovaniy// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye zna-
2. niya. – 2008. - ¹1. - S.186-189.
3. Galagan A.I. Obrazovanie dlya vsekh: retrospektivnyy analiz tseley, strategiy i rezul'tatov// Sotsial'no-guma-
4. nitarnye znaniya. – 2006. - ¹6. - S.204-220.
5. Galinovskiy A.L. Perspektivy povysheniya kachestva obrazovatel'nogo protsessa v aspiranture fiziko-tekhni-
6. cheskogo profilya za schet informirovanno-analiticheskogo obespecheniya// Otkrytoe obrazovanie. – 2006. - ¹1.
7. -S.29-34.
8. Guruzhapov V.A. Problema razvitiya professional'nykh kompetentsiy budushchikh spetsialistov// Psikhologicheskaya
9. nauka i obrazovanie. – 2008. - ¹2. – S.5-7
10. Devyatova S.V. Kakim dolzhno byt' sovremennoe obrazovanie?// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnoe znanie. – 2006. - ¹5.
11. - S.64-79.
12. Zborovskiy G.E. Obrazovanie kak resurs informatsionnogo obshchestva/ G.E. Zborovskiy, E.A. Shuklina//
13. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 2005. - ¹7. - S.107-113.
14. Zeer E.F. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod k obrazovaniyu// http://www.urorao.ru/kont2005.php?mode=and exmod= zeer
15. Komardina L.S. Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva organizatsiy obrazovaniya// Vnutrivuzovskie sistemy obes-
16. pecheniya kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov: materialy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii.
17. – Krasnoyarsk: GOU VPO «GATsMiZ», 2003. – C. 36-38.
18. Kuz'minov Ya.I. Universitety v Rossii i v Amerike: razlichiya akademicheskikh konventsiy/ Ya.I Kuz'minov, M.M.
19. Yudkevich// Voprosy obrazovaniya. – 2007. - ¹4. – S.141-158.
20. Mindibekova A.A. Ob issledovanii sistemy obrazovaniya v sotsiologii// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnoe znanie.-
21. 2005. - ¹5. - S.216-227.
22. Muzyakov S.I. Tsennostnye osnovaniya modernizatsii vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya v Rossii//
23. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya. – 2007. - ¹2. - S.4-11.
24. Popov A.I. Formirovanie tvorcheskoy kompetentnosti spetsialista v usloviyakh olimpiadnogo dvizheniya//
25. Otkrytoe obrazovanie. – 2005. - ¹6. – S.23-30.
26. Prokhorova E.A. Organizatsionno-pedagogicheskie aspekty upravleniya kachestvom obrazovaniya na urovne fa-
27. kul'teta/ E.A. Prokhorova, N.A. Rusakova// Kachestvo obrazovaniya: sistemy upravleniya, dostizheniya, proble-
28. my: Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii/ Pod obshch. red. A.S. Vostrikova. –
29. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGTU, 2003. – Tom II. - S.190-193.
30. Servatinskiy V. O formirovanii sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva obrazovatel'nykh uslug// Vnutrivuzovskie
31. sistemy obespecheniya kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov: materialy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy kon-
32. ferentsii. – Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo GATsMiZ, 2003. – S. 21-24.
33. Tret'yakov O.B. Potentsial'noe kachestvo obrazovaniya// Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. – 2006. - ¹3.
34. – S.49-64.
35. Filatova M.N. Obrazovatel'nom protsesse: tseli, printsipy, tekhnologii/ M.N. Filatova, L.V. Volkova//
36. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya. – 2007. - ¹9. - S.4-15.
37. Khoukht A. Kachestvo obrazovaniya v Velikobritanii: voprosy doveriya, kontrolya, professional'noy avtonomnos-
38. ti i podotchetnosti// Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya. – 2006. - ¹10. – S.63-66.
39. Shcheglov P.E. Kachestvo vysshego obrazovaniya. Riski pri podgotovke spetsialistov/ P.E Shcheglov, N.Sh. Nikitina//
40. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. – 2003. - ¹3. – S. 23-29.
41. http://www.complexdoc.ru/scan/
42. Weiss H. Education quality system at the university of Leoben// Kachestvo obrazovaniya: sistemy upravleniya, do-
43. stizheniya, problemy: materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-metodicheskoy konferentsii/ Pod obshch. red. A.S.
44. Vostrikova. – Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGTU, 2003. – Tom II. – C.181-186.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.