Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Popov, S. V. Russian Authority and Parliamentary Opposition in 2000th

Abstract: The article analyzes various conceptions regarding the status of the parliamentary opposition and the nature of the Russian party system in 2000th. These conceptions were fi xed in a political discourse. As a result, the two particular positions seem to be evident. From the point of view of representatives of executive authority, now in Russia we have a multiparty system with one dominating party which has been typical for some Western democratic states at different periods of history. Based on the members of the parliamentary opposition and some experts, the Russian model of party relations has acquired authoritarian features which is typical for Hegemon constructs. The article views arguments and proofs of each conception presented.

Keywords:

political science, opposition, hegemon party, satellite party, Sartori, United Russia Party System, political monopoly, electoral disability, dominating party.

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Gel'man V.Ya. Politicheskaya oppozitsiya v Rossii: vymirayushchiy vid? // Tretiy elektoral'nyy tsikl v
2. Rossii, 2003-2004 gody. SPb., 2007. S. 59-90.
3. Gel'man V.Ya. Politicheskie partii v Rossii: ot konkurentsii – k ierarkhii // Elektoral'noe prostrans-
4. tvo sovremennoy Rossii. Politicheskaya nauka: Ezhegodnik 2008. M., 2009. S. 27-49.
5. Glukhova A.V. Politicheskiy konflikt: mekhanizm ili tormoz rossiyskoy transformatsii? // Demokratiya,
6. upravlenie, kul'tura: problemnye izmereniya sovremennoy politiki. Politicheskaya nauka: Ezhegodnik
7. 2006. M., 2007. S. 228-244.
8. Golosov g.V. Elektoral'nyy avtoritarizm v Rossii // Pro et Contra. 2008. T. 12. №1. S. 22-35.
9. Dal' R.A. Poliarkhiya: uchastie i oppozitsiya. M., 2010.
10. Kagarlitskiy B. Upravlyaemaya demokratiya. Ekaterinburg, 2005.
11. Korgunyuk Yu.G. Pochti gegemon // URL: http://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2007/12/26_a_2475033.shtml (data
12. obrashcheniya – 08.07.2011)
13. Korgunyuk Yu.G. Stanovlenie partiynoy sistemy v sovremennoy Rossii. M., 2007.
14. Lapina N.Yu. Rossiyskiy politicheskiy rezhim: otsenki i interpretatsii // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdu-
15. narodnye otnosheniya. 2009. №6. S. 17-30.
16. Kholodkovskiy K.G. K voprosu o politicheskoy sisteme sovremennoy Rossii // Elektoral'noe prostrans-
17. tvo sovremennoy Rossii. Politicheskaya nauka: Ezhegodnik 2008. M., 2009. S. 117-135.
18. Apter D. Some Refl ections on the Role of a Political Opposition in New Nations // Comparative Studies in
19. Society and History. 1962. Vol. 4. No 2. P. 154-168.
20. Blondel J. Political Opposition in the Contemporary World // Government and Opposition. 1997. Vol. 32. No 4.
21. P. 462-486.
22. Dahl R. (ed.) Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, 1966.
23. Ionescu G. and Madariaga I. Opposition. London, 1968.
24. Lipset S. The Indispensability of Political Parties // Journal of Democracy. 2000. Vol. 11. No 1. P. 48-55.
25. Sartori G. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge, 1976.
26. Wilson A. Virtual Politics. Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. New Haven and London, 2005.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.