Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Gurbanov, R. A. The Perspective of the European Union Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights and its Infl uence on the Relations of the Judicial Bodies of the European Union and of the Council of Europe

Abstract: This paper presents the perspective of the EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights and its infl uence on the relations of the judicial bodies of the EU and of the Council of Europe. Author thinks that the accession of EU to the Convention will fi x a hierarchical relation between the judicial bodies of the EU and of the Council of Europe, which exists already. This hierarchical relation was built on the normative submission of the European Court of Justice to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.

Keywords:

European Union, European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe, European Court of Justice, European Court of Human Rights, judicial bodies cooperation, hierarchy, competence, judicial control.

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Kuznetsova S.N. Vzaimodeystvie Evropeyskogo soyuza i Soveta Evropy v oblasti zashchity osnovnykh prav
2. cheloveka. Diss…kand. yurid. nauk. – Kazan', 2005 – 209 s.
3. Fl. Benoît-Rohmer. L’adhésion de l’Union à la convention européenne des droits de l’homme. // RUDH, 2000.
4. O. De Schutter. L’adhésion de l’Union européenne à la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme comme
5. élément du débat sur l’avenir de l’Union, in L’anvenir du système juridictionnel de l’Union européenne. // IEE,
6. 2002. – R. 225.
7. O. De Schutter. Fonction de juger et droits fondamentaux. Transformation du contrôle juridictionnel dans les
8. ordres juridiques américain et européen. – Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1999.
9. H.C. Kruger, J. Polakiewicz. Propositions pour la création d’un système cohérent de protection des droits de
10. l’homme en Europe. // RUDH, 2002. – R. 1.
11. S. Marquard. The Conclusion of International Agreements under Article 24 of the Treaty on European Union, in
12. V. Kronenberg (ed.), The European Union and the International Legal Order: Discord or Harmony? // The Hague,
13. TMC Asser Press, 2001. – R. 341.
14. R. Noguellou. Adhésion de l’Union européenne à la CEDH: position de la Commission. // Droit administratif.
15. N5, 2010.
16. J. Rideau. La participation de l’Union européenne aux organisations internationales. // Rapport au colloque de
17. Bordeaux de la Société française pour le droit international. – Pedone, 2000. – R. 301.
18. T. Schelling. The Autonomy, of the Community Legal Order: An Analysis of Possible Foundations. // Harvard
19. International Law Journal. Vol. 37, N2, 1996. – R. 389.
20. D. Simon, Des infl uences réciproques entre CJCE et CEDH: «je t’aime, moi non plus»? / Les Cours européennes
21. - Luxembourg et Strasbourg. // Pouvoirs. ¹96, Janvier 2001. – R. 35.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.