Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Lopatin, D. B. The Problem of the Choice of Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration

Abstract: The article is devoted to the problems arising when arbiters of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation follows the algorithm of the choice of applicable law based on the experience of foreign states and international forums. The article analyzes the confl ict of will and expression of will by holders of right in the light of reservation of rights applicable to private law deals, - in the fi rst place, the problem of the choice of law by the parties. The author also analyzes the problem of using the legal rules by arbiters when there is no choice of applicable law by the parties of a contract.


Keywords:

law, international private law of Russia, international commercial arbitration, applicable law, International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Fe, International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Spain, choice-of-law clause, arbitrage clause, rules governing choice of laws.


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Bardina M.P. Opredelenie prava, primenimogo k sushchestvu spora v praktike MKAS. V kn.: Aktual'nye
2. voprosy mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha. M., 2002. S. 25 – 27
3. Naletov K.I. Osnovnye problemy razresheniya sporov, voznikayushchikh v sfere pol'zovaniya nedrami //
4. Materialy Vserossiyskogo nauchno-metodologicheskogo seminara / Pod red. prof. G.E. Bystrova. Kazan':
5. Izd-vo “Taglimat” IEUP, 2007
6. Giuditta Cordero Moss Tacit choice of law, Partial choice and closest connection The Case of Common Law
7. Contract Models Governed by a Civilian Law” Rett og toleranse - Festskrift Helge Johan Thue. Ed. Giertsen, J.,
8. Frantzen, T. and Moss, G.C.. Gyldendal, 2007. 367-378
9. Hamlyn & Co. v. Talisker Distillery [1984] AC 202 (HL) 5.Spurrier v. La Cloche [1902] AC 446 (PC);
10. Tzortzis v. Monark Line A/B [1968] 1 Weekly L.R.406 (CA).
11. A.V.Dicey and J.H.C. Morris, The Confl ict of Laws, vol. 1: II (London, 1980)
12. F. Russell, Russell on the Law of Arbitration, 19th edn. (London, 1979), p. 63
13. Naletov K.I. Kategoriya “kommercheskoe predpriyatie storon” v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave//
14. “Grazhdanin i pravo”, N 10, oktyabr' 2009 g.
15. Akhrimenko M.A. Osnovnye doktriny opredeleniya prava, podlezhashchego primeneniyu k dogovornym obya-
16. zatel'stvam, i praktika ikh primeneniya sudami SShA// Treteyskiy sud -2005. - ¹1.
17. Gavrilov V.V. Arbitrazhnaya ogovorka i opredelenie primenimogo prava v mezhdunarodnom kommerches-
18. kom arbitrazhe // Aktual'nye problemy mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa. Materialy mezhduna-
19. rodnoy konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 10 - 11oktyabrya 2002 g.. - S.-Pb.: Rossiya - Neva, 2003. - S. 183-190
20. Taida Begic Applicable Law in International Investment Disputes Utrecht: Eleven International Pub., 2005
21. Yukhno A.S. “Zontichnye” ogovorki v praktike mezhdunarodnykh arbitrazhnykh tribunalov: poslednie ten-
22. dentsii // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2010. N 5. S. 2 - 10
23. N.Jivraj v S. Hashwani [2010] EWCA Civ 712 (22 June 2010)
24. Giuditta Cordero Moss “International Arbitration and the Quest for the Applicable Law,” Global Jurist: Vol. 8:
25. Iss. 3 (Advances), Article 2. 2008 Available at: http://www.bepress.com/gj/vol8/iss3/art2
26. Reshenie MKAS pri TPP RF ot 13.01.2004 po delu N 185/2002
27. Reshenie MKAS pri TPP RF ot 17.03.1999 po delu N 272/1997
28. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 31 oktyabrya 1995 goda “O nekotorykh voprosakh primene-
29. niya sudami Konstitutsii RF pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya” // Byulleten' VS RF. 1996. N 1.
30. Reshenie Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda pri Torgovo-Promyshlennoy Palate RF ot
31. 30.01.04 ¹141/2003
32. Reshenie Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda pri Torgovo-Promyshlennoy Palate RF ot
33. 13.02.08 ¹81/2007