Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Pavlov V.S., Maslanov D.V. Foreign view upon the Russian post-Soviet Parliament of the 1994-2007

Abstract: The subject of this research is the view of the foreign and particularly English-American scholars upon one of the imperative institutions of state authority of any country – the Parliament, or in this case, the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.  The perception of Russian in public consciousness of Western countries has always been synonymous with controversy, bordering disapproval and condemnation, which generally reflects the overall relationship between Russian and the West. The foreign researchers of the Russian democratic transit demonstrate that the main vector of the analysis lies in the President of the Russian Federation, but we can also observe pool of the research dedicated to the legislative branch of authority. The authors examine several most illustrative articles on the development of the Russian Parliament of the first four convocations, and based on this, their view upon the genesis of this institution can be traced. The scientific novelty consists in the use of particular little-studied works on this topic on the language of origin. Analyzing these works, the authors conclude that the attitude towards the Parliament changes with time, which correlates with the relation of the Western society regarding the Russian reality. The descriptions differ from the very “democratic” parliament during the time of B. N. Yeltsin to the rubber-stamp parliament of the Presidential Administration during V. V. Putin’s presidency.


Keywords:

Superpresidentialism, Parliamentary control, Political parties, Principle of separation of powers, Russia, Presidential Administration, Democratic transit, State Duma of the Russian Federation, V. V. Putin, B. N. Yeltsin


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Tsygankov A.P. Mezhdu liberal'noy demokratiey i spolzaniem v avtoritarizm: predvaritel'nye itogi politicheskogo razvitiya Rossii // Sotsial'no-politicheskiy zhurnal. 1997. ¹1. S. 15 – 37.
2. Sakwa R. Putin’s Leadership: Character and Consequences // Europe-Asia Studies,-2008.-¹60 (6). – P. 879 – 897.
3. Chaisty P. Legislative Politics and Economic Power in Russia. – Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006. P. 34.
4. Remington Thomas F. Patronage and the Party of Power: President – Parliament Relations Under Vladimir Putin // Europe-Asia Studies,-2008.-¹60 (6). – P. 959 – 987.
5. Remington Thomas F. Majorities without Mandates: The Russian Federation Council Since 2000 // Europe-Asia Studies. 2003. ¹ 55(5). P. 667-691.
6. Chaisty P., Schleiter P. Productive but not Valued: the Russian State Duma, 1994 – 2001 // Europe-Asia Studies. – 2002.-¹54 (5). – pp. 701 – 724.
7. Remington Thomas F. The Russian Parliament: Institutional Evolution in a Transitional Regime, 1989 – 1999. – New Haven, CT & London : Yale University Press, 2001. P. 23.
8. Sakwa R. Russian politics and society. London: Routledge, 2008. P. 32.
9. Remington Thomas F., Smith Steven S. Theories of Legislative Institutions and the Organization of the Russian Duma // American Journal of Political Science,-1998. – Vol. 42 / 2. – P. 543-569
10. Chaisty P. Gleissner, J. The Consolidation of Russian Parliamentarism: The State Duma 1993 – 1998 / in N. Robinson ed. Institutions and Change in Russian Politics. – Basingstoke: MacMillan, 2000. P. 22.
11. Chaisty P. Legislative Politics in Russia / in A. Brown Contemporary Russia Politics : a Reader. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. P. 21.
12. Uitmor S. Tstenie molodosti ili plesen' starosti? Parlamentskiy kontrol' v Gosudarstvennoy Dume chetvertogo sozyva // Neprikosnovennyy zapas. – URL: http://www.nlobooks.ru/sites/default/files/old/nlobooks.ru/rus/nz-online/619/828/839/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 25.02.2016).
13. Whitmore S. Parliamentary Oversight in Putin’s Neo-Patrimonial State. Watchdogs or Show-dogs? // Europe-Asia Studies,-2010.-¹62 (6). P. 999 – 1025.
14. Shevtsova L.F. Smena rezhima ili sistemy? // Polis. 2004. ¹1 S. 46-51.
15. Robinson N. The Politics of Russia’s Partial Democracy / Political studies review – 2003. – Vol.1 – P. 149 – 166.
16. Lints Kh. Opasnosti prezidentstva-URL: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Polit/Article/lin_opasn.php.-Biblioteka Gumer (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2013).
17. Lukin A.V. Perekhodnyy period v Rossii: demokratizatsiya i liberal'nye reformy // Polis. 1999. ¹ 2 S. 134-155.
18. Chepus A.V. Pravitel'stvo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sostav i poryadok ego formirovaniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 230 - 240. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.2.14459.
19. Sergeeva S.L. Osobennosti natsional'noy politicheskoy kul'tury: sotsiokul'turnaya spetsifika i perspektivy razvitiya v usloviyakh sovremennoy rossiyskoy deystvitel'nosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1286 - 1301. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.10.9838.