Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Shelestinskiy D.G. Federalism of law: objective peculiarities of development

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the analysis of the establishment of the principle of federalism in the United States of America, as well as the problems of its practical implementation and factors that affected this selection of the form of cooperation of states. The work generalizes the practical experience of application of federalism of law and judicial system that ensures its realization, “implied authority” and “supremacy clause” of the U. S. Constitution with consideration of opinions of a number of researchers. A comparative analysis is conducted on realization of the principle of federalism of law in the United States and the Russian Federation. Based on the conducted analysis, the author determines the specificity of the functionality of this principle of federalism of law that is characteristic namely for the United States. The author highlights the peculiarities of the development of Russia that form a different understanding and application of this principle. A conclusion is made on the limitation of the branches of government authority on the federal and regional levels in the United States.


Keywords:

Anglo-Saxon legal system, Hierarchy of the sources of law, Limitations of legislative regulation, Principle of residual competence, Competence of federal authorities, State authority, Cooperation of states, Implied authority, Supremacy clause, Federalism of law


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. O.N. Dubrovskiy Znachenie natsional'nykh obychaev i traditsiy v postroenii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: na primere Respubliki Tyva // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 8. - C. 5 - 8.
2. Pavliv A.A. Razvitie gosudarstvennosti v Rossii na fone analogichnykh protsessov v Anglii i Frantsii (dorevolyutsionnyy period) // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 24 - 35. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2015.1.15631.
3. A. Kh. Shagieva Kontseptual'nye podkhody k modelirovaniyu protsessov institutsionalizatsii antikrizisnogo upravleniya v usloviyakh tsiklichnosti razvitiya
4. khozyaystvennykh sistem // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 6. - C. 84 - 93.
5. Kutishchev A.V. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnye aspekty voyn pozdnego feodalizma. // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 7. - C. 855 - 863. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.7.12314.
6. Ganyushkina E.B. Vliyanie globalizatsii na formirovanie mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo prava // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2013. - 4. - C. 465 - 475. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10502.
7. Borisov A.M. Reformirovanie sistemy organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti i novaya skhema gosudarstvennogoterritorial'nogo upravleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 9. - C. 33 - 37.
8. Shestak O.I. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v kontekste polnomochiy organov mestnogo samoupravleniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2015. - 5. - C. 591 - 602. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.5.15102.
9. Deklaratsiya nezavisimosti Soedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki 1776 g. M. 1976 g.
10. U. Bernam. Pravovaya sistema SShA. M.: RIO «Novaya yustitsiya», 2006.
11. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 1993 g. M. 2015.
12. Petrova E.A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy pravovoy sistemy SShA // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2010. ¹4.
13. Federalist. Politicheskie esse A. Gamil'tona, Dzh. Medisona i Dzh. Dzheya: Per. s angl. / Pod obshch. red., s predisl. N.N.Yakovleva, komment. O.L.Stepanovoy. – M.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Progress» – «Litera», 1994.