Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Skorobogatov A.V., Krasnov A.V. Legal reality as a category of juridical science

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the juridical meaning of the category of “legal reality”, introduced into the scientific use within the framework of post-classical juridical science. The goal of this work is to study the “legal reality” as a category of juridical science, determine and analyze the ontological and gnoseological meaning of this concept, which defines the bases for functionality of the legal phenomena in a specific society. The legal reality is being examined from the positions of various methodological approaches, which allows seeing it not only on different ontological levels and aspects, but to also determine its gnoseological potential for development of juridical science. The author gives an original definition to the category of “legal reality” and original definition is given to the category of “legal reality”. The author studies the key element and aspects of this category, and makes a conclusion that the legal reality as a fundamental category of juridical science is a complexly organized multi-level system, which encompasses both, the realistically existing legal phenomena, as well as the legal ideal, and defines the sphere of being of the law for the individual and society.


Keywords:

Anthropological legal research, Juridical science, Methodological pluralism, Post-classical scientific reality, Post-modernistic legal concepts, Legal phenomenon, Legal science, Being of law, Category of juridical science, Legal reality


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Campos A.S. Aquinas's lex iniusta non est lex: a Test of Legal Validity // Source: Archiv fuer Rechts-und Sozialphilosphie. – 2014. – Vol. 100. – # 3. – P. 366-378(13). – URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/fsv/arsp/2014/00000100/00000003/art00006.
2. Sherwin R.K. The Narrative Construction of Legal Reality // Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors. – 2009. – Vol. 6. – P. 93-94.
3. Tyler J. A Pragmatic Standard of Legal Validity. Dissertation.-Texas A7M University (2012) URL: http://philpapers.org/rec/TYLAPS.
4. Van Hoeske M. Law as Communication.-Oxford-Portland Oregon, 2002.
5. Barsukov A.Yu. Pravovoy progress kak yuridicheskaya kategoriya: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk.-Saratov: Saratov, gosud. akad. prava, 2004.
6. Bol'shakov E.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniya problemy pravovoy real'nosti // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki.-Tambov: Gramota, 2013.-¹ 6 (32).-Ch. 2.-C.40-43.
7. Demidov A.I. Pravovedenie: ot metodologicheskogo anarkhizma k metodologicheskomu plyuralizmu // Gosudarstvo i pravo na rubezhe vekov: Problemy teorii i istorii (materialy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii). – M.: Izd-vo IGiP RAN, 2001. – S. 125-130.
8. Krasnov A.V. Soderzhanie sanktsiy norm prava v kontekste printsipa uvazheniya prav cheloveka // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2014. – ¹ 3. – S. 164-169.
9. Krasnov A.V. Soderzhanie sanktsiy norm prava v svete informatsionno-psikhologicheskogo podkhoda k issledovaniyu pravovykh yavleniy // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 226-233
10. Kret O.V. Pravovaya real'nost': ontologo-gnosseologicheskiy analiz. Avtoref. diss. … kand. filos. nauk. Tambov: Tambov. gosud. un-t, 2007..
11. Maksimov S.I. Pravovaya real'nost': opyt filosofskogo osmysleniya. – Khar'kov: Pravo, 2002.
12. Polyakov A.V. Kommunikativnaya kontseptsiya prava (genezis i teoretiko-pravovoe obosnovanie). Diss… dokt. yurid. nauk. – SPb.: SPbGU, 2002.
13. Skorobogatov A.V. Integral'nyy kharakter sovremennogo rossiyskogo pravoponimaniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-¹ 3.-S.1-11. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.3.11127. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11127.html
14. Skorobogatov A.V. Kontsept «pravo» v rossiyskom yuridicheskom diskurse // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. – 2013.-¹ 4(28). – S. 233 – 240.
15. Skorobogatov A.V. Faktory formirovaniya pravovoy real'nosti Rossii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. – 2014.-¹ 8.-S. 1572 – 1576.
16. Slobodnyuk S.L. Pravovaya real'nost' i krizis pravosoznaniya. – Saarbrücken, Deutschland: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012.
17. Syrykh V.M. Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoy nauki: uchebnik.-M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012. – S. 38.
18. Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoy nauki. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Gumanitarnogo un-ta, 2001.
19. Timofeev A.V. Yuridicheskiy opyt problemy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Yaroslavl': Yaroslav. gosud. un-t, 2008.
20. Gulyaikhin V.N. K voprosu o metodologii dissertatsionnykh rabot v yuridicheskoy nauke // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 1. - C. 92 - 106. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10.html
21. A. V. Stovba A. RAYNAKh I N.N. ALEKSEEV:U ISTOKOV FENOMENOLOGII PRAVA // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 2. - C. 371 - 376.