Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Odoev O.S.
To the history of the question of structuring of the element of crime using administrative prejudice
// Law and Politics.
2016. ¹ 6.
P. 806-812.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52654
Odoev O.S. To the history of the question of structuring of the element of crime using administrative prejudiceAbstract: The subject of this research is construction of the elements of crime using administrative prejudice. The essence of this method of construction consists in the fact that an administrative offense that has been committed by the same individual within a legally established period of time is being “transformed” into a criminal offense. The article examines the historical aspect of the aforementioned means of structuring: questions pertaining to the conditions under which it originated and saw its further development within the framework of specific legal structures. The author conducts the analysis of the processes of origin and evolution of the structuring of the elements of crime using administrative prejudice. The examination includes the current approaches within the legal theory towards perception of the nature of origin of the administrative prejudice in criminal law. The author offers arguments that testify to the imperfectness of the approach, the essence of which lies in the fact that the elements of crimes with administrative prejudice had pre-revolutionary prototypes. The author also makes presuppositions that the norms containing elements of a crime with administrative prejudice have received their first official establishment during the pre-codification period of development of Russian criminal law. Keywords: history of administrative prejudice, history of criminal law, legal construction, element of crime, offense, crime, administrative prejudice, tax crimes, administrative law, Soviet criminal law
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Sobranie uzakoneniy i rasporyazheniy pravitel'stva. 1921. ¹ 68. St. 543.
2. Artamonova M.A. Nekotorye voprosy otvetstvennosti za ekologicheskie pravonarusheniya po ugolovnomu i administrativnomu sovetskomu zakonodatel'stvu // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. 2013. ¹ 1(13). S. 44-52 3. Chibizov A.V. K voprosu ob administrativnoy preyuditsii v delakh o zhestokom obrashchenii s zhivotnymi po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu RSFSR 1960 g. // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. 2011. ¹ 7(99). S. 248-251 i dr. 4. Ugolovnyy kodeks Belorusskoy SSR. M.: Yuridicheskoe izdatel'stvo NKYu, 1944. S. 76. 5. Bezverkhov A.G. Administrativnaya preyuditsial'nost' v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoki, realii, perspektivy // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. 2011. ¹ 2(10). S. 39-51 6. Bobrovich P.P. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya v ugolovnom prave // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2013. ¹ 2(7). S. 46-50 7. Ivanchin A.V. Kontseptual'nye osnovy konstruirovaniya sostava prestupleniya: diss. dok. yurid. nauk. Yaroslavl', 2014. S. 313-329 8. Malkov V.P. Neodnokratnost' pravonarusheniya i administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstva kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii sodeyannogo v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2013. ¹ 2(7). S. 179–187 i dr. 9. Yamasheva E.V. K voprosu o vosstanovlenii instituta administrativnoy preyuditsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. ¹ 10. S. 69-79. 10. Shkredova E.G. Sovokupnost' prestupleniy po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu i doktrine vtoroy poloviny XIX v. // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2008. ¹ 8. S. 64-68. 11. Shkredova E.G. Mnozhestvennost' prestupleniy (istoricheskiy aspekt). M.: Yurlitinform, 2011. 184 s. 12. Chibizov A.V. K voprosu ob administrativnoy preyuditsii v delakh o zhestokom obrashchenii s zhivotnymi po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu RSFSR 1960 g. // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. 2011. ¹ 7(99). S. 248-251. 13. Khavronyuk N.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya i institut retsidiva s tochki zreniya ugolovnogo prava evropeyskikh stran [Elektronnyy resurs] URL: http://pravo.zakon.kz/190761-administrativnaja-prejudicija-i.html (data obrashcheniya: 20 aprelya 2015 g.) 14. Sbornik dokumentov po istorii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva 1917-1952 gg. / Pod red. I.T. Golyakova. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo yuridicheskoy literatury. 463 s. 15. Tagantsev N.S. Ulozhenie o nakazaniyakh ugolovnykh i ispravitel'nykh 1885 goda. SPb., 1892. 796 s. 16. Ugolovnyy kodeks Belorusskoy SSR. M.: Yuridicheskoe izdatel'stvo NKYu, 1944. S. 76. 17. Urda M.N. Sotsial'no-politicheskaya obuslovlennost' ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe predprinimatel'stvo // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 291-304. 18. Popova I.A. Istoriya razvitiya administrativnoy preyuditsii kak obyazatel'nogo priznaka nekotorykh sostavov prestupleniy // Ugolovnoe pravo. Strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke. Materialy XII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (29-30 yanvarya 2015 g.). M.: RG-Press. 2015. S. 92-95. 19. Ivanchin A.V. Kontseptual'nye osnovy konstruirovaniya sostava prestupleniya: diss. dok. yurid. nauk. Yaroslavl', 2014. 462 s. 20. Karaev T.E. Povtornost' prestupleniy. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura. 1983. 104 s. 21. Kolosova V.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. ¹ 5. S. 246-254. 22. Kucherov I.I. Nalogi i kriminal. Istoriko-pravovoy analiz. M., 2000. 351 s. 23. Mayorova E.I. Neodnokratnost' prestupleniy po ugolovnomu pravu: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1999. 143 s. 24. Malkov V.P. Neodnokratnost' pravonarusheniya i administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstva kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii sodeyannogo v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2013. ¹ 2(7). 2013. S. 179–187. 25. Pamyatniki russkogo prava / Pod red. L.V. Cherepnina. Vyp. 3. M.: Gos. izd-vo yuridicheskoy lit-ry, 1955. 529 s. 26. Bytko Yu.I. Uchenie o retsidive prestupleniy v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: istoriya i sovremennost': diss. dok. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1998. 303 s. 27. Bobrovich P.P. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya v ugolovnom prave // Biblioteka kriminalista. 2013. ¹ 2(7). S. 46-50. 28. Izvestiya TsIK SSSR i VTsIK ot 21 yanvarya 1925 g. ¹ 17. 29. Sbornik dokumentov po istorii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva 1917-1952 gg. / Pod red. I.T. Golyakova. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo yuridicheskoy literatury. S. 125-126. 30. Bezverkhov A.G. Administrativnaya preyuditsial'nost' v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Rossii: istoki, realii, perspektivy // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. 2011. ¹ 2(10). S. 39-51. 31. Babaev V.K. Sovetskoe pravo kak logicheskaya sistema. M.: RIO Akad. MVD SSSR, 1978. 212 s. 32. Artamonova M.A. Nekotorye voprosy otvetstvennosti za ekologicheskie pravonarusheniya po ugolovnomu i administrativnomu sovetskomu zakonodatel'stvu // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. 2013. ¹ 1(13). S. 44-52. |