Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Yarovenko V.V. Participation of attesting witnesses in an investigation

Abstract: The subject of this research is the legal regulation of the participation of the attesting witnesses in investigations. The author gives attention to the legislative changes of the institution of attesting witnesses in Russia, which prompted a discussion among both, scholars and legal professionals. The article explores various opinions of scholars and the investigative-legal practice of investigative work involving attesting witnesses. An undefined, and an important from the practical point of view factor, is the questioning of the attesting witness on the witness stand and acceptance of their statement as proof. The author comes to the conclusion that there is a need for changes in the participation of attesting witnesses in investigations with consideration of the realities of today. A guarantee of the validity of evidence will in time be ensured by use of technological means of recording of facts used by the investigators and specialists, rather than by participation of attesting witness in investigations. In order to exclude the problem of validity of the recording of evidence via technological means, it is necessary to implement Part 2 of the Article 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which establishes responsibility of the detectives and investigators for falsification of evidence.


Keywords:

Testimony, Investigation, Evidence, Attesting witness, Protection, Recording, Technological means, Court, Investigator, Inquiry

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Glushchenko O.P. Razvitie ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva o privlechenii ponyatykh dlya uchastiya v sledstvennykh deistviyakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2015. ¹ 6. C. 787-792. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.6.15593.
2. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 19.04.2011 delo ¹ 80-011-7
3. Ryabtseva E.V. Zloupotreblenie pravom v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstva. M., 2013. S. 43.
4. Sergeich P. Iskusstvo rechi na sude. M., 1988. S. 122.
5. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1991. S. 193-194.
6. Yarovenko V.V. Tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie fiksatsii khoda i rezul'tatov sledstvennogo deistviya // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SWorld. Vyp. 3. T. 32. Odessa: KUPRIENKO SV, 2013. S. 47-50.
7. Federal'nyi zakon ot 4 marta 2013 g. N 23-FZ "O vnesenii izmenenii v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii" (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) // Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/70326874/#ixzz3drkVJG6O
8. Federal'nym zakonom ot 4 iyulya 2003 goda ¹ 92-FZ (red. ot 02.12.2008) "O vnesenii izmenenii i dopolnenii v ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii". https://www.referent.ru/1/121881
9. Seleznev M. Ponyatoi ili svidetel'? // Zakonnost'. 1998. ¹ 1. S. 35-36.
10. Bykov V. Institut ponyatykh v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. ¹ 3. S. 72-74
11. Storozheva, A.N. Ponyatoi v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Avtoref. kandidat diss. yurid. nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2006. S. 99. http://www.dissercat.com/content/ponyatoi-v-rossiiskom-ugolovnom-sudoproizvodstve#ixzz3drsIj8sk
12. Khitrova O.V. Razvitie instituta ponyatykh v UPK RF // http://www.lawmix.ru/comm/1211. Data obrashcheniya 18.05 2015 goda.
13. Tsimbal L.M. Vestnik kriminalistiki. M., 2006. Vyp. 1(17). S. 78.
14. Efremov I.A. Iz praktiki privlecheniya advokatom spetsialistov dlya raz''yasneniya voprosov, trebuyushchikh spetsial'nykh znanii // Advokat. 2008. ¹ 3. S. 67.
15. Prikaz Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 4 maya 2011g. ¹ 74 «Ob organizatsii raboty s obshchestvennymi pomoshchnikami sledovatelya v sisteme sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiiskoi Federatsii» http://dokipedia.ru/document/5165352
16. Ryzhakov A.P. Raz''yasnenie pravovoi osnovy uchastiya ponyatykh v proizvodstve sledstvennykh deistvii // Konsul'tantPlyus, 2008. S. 43.
17. Osinov V.V. Est' li v Rossii sudebnyi nadzor? // Advokat. 2008. ¹ 3. S. 65.
18. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 21.12.2006 ¹ 78-o06-96
19. Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie ot 23 iyunya 2015 goda po delu ¹ 22-3715/2015. Primorskii kraevoi sud, g. Vladivostok.
20. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoi kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 dekabrya 2005 g. ¹ 49-005-73 // SPS Konsul'tant.
21. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie VS RF ot 29.04.2004 delo ¹ 49-o04-8
22. Federal'nyi zakon ot 5 iyunya 2007 g. N 87-FZ "O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Federal'nyi zakon "O prokurature Rossiiskoi Federatsii" (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) Sistema GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/12153934/#ixzz3drj36bSe
23. Kamynin I.D. Dopustimost' dokazatel'stv // Ugolovnyi protsess. 2006. ¹ 4. S. 64.
24. Chupakhin R. Institut ponyatogo v ugolovnom protsesse nuzhdaetsya v sovershenstvovanii // Sledovatel'. 2003. ¹ 4. S. 12-13.
25. Kicheev B. Vse li ponyatno ponyatym? // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1990. ¹ 6. S. 34.
26. Rossinskii S.B. Proizvodstvo obyska v forme spetsial'noi operatsii: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. S. 85-86.
27. Zagvozdkin N.N. Ob uchastii ponyatykh v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse // Dal'nevostochnye kriminalisticheskie chteniya. Vyp. 4: Sb. nauch. tr. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostoch. un-ta, 1999. S. 58-59.
28. Khitrova O.V. Uchastie ponyatykh v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Spark, 1998. S. 29.
29. Kalugin A. Ponyatoi v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 1998. ¹ 10. S. 11.
30. Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2011. ¹ 4. C. 45 - 50.
31. Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Politseiskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. 2013. ¹ 2. C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
32. Yarovenko V.V., Poleshchuk O.V. O predmete nauki kriminalistiki // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2016. ¹ 3. C. 309 - 322. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2016.3.18372.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.