Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Mantulina O.O.
Alimony for disabled and adult dependence in need
// Law and Politics.
2016. ¹ 3.
P. 397-402.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52607
Mantulina O.O. Alimony for disabled and adult dependence in needAbstract: This article explores the issues of alimony for adult disabled children in need from the comparative legal perspective. In the comparative key the author examines the subject composition of parties, as well as conditions for provision of alimony (disability, need). This work considers the normative material and legal precedent of various legal families on the example of such states and state constructs as Germany, Russia, France, California (U. S.), Morocco, and Algeria. The author highlights the regularities of the institution of alimony that is common for all countries, as well as the specificity of each of them. The alimony institution for disabled adult dependence in need carries a different specificity in different legal families. These peculiarities pertain to both, the subject composition of alimony obligations, and the conditions under which the alimony payer and alimony recipient acquire mutual rights and responsibilities within the framework of alimony obligations. The author makes the recommendations for improving the Russian legislation in light of the examples of the foreign law. Keywords: alimony conditions, parties to legal relations, adult children, invalids, disabled, alimony, Family Law, need, sufficiency of funds, alimony payer
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Khusnetdinova L. Pravo na alimenty sovershennoletnikh trudosposobnykh detey, obuchayushchikhsya v vuze // Zakonnost'. 2009. ¹ 3. S. 76.
2. Ksenofontova D.S. Ponyatie i kriterii nuzhdaemosti po semeynomu pravu Rossii i Germanii // Vestnik TVGU. Seriya «Pravo». 2014. ¹ 2. S. 156. 3. Saad-Zoy, S., Cheriet, B., Rhissassi, F., Berjaoui, Kh., Ammar, M. Femmes, droit de la famille et système judiciaire en Algérie, au Maroc et en Tunisie. UNESCO Publishing. 2010. 207 s. 4. Kosova O.Yu. Ponyatie i vidy alimentnykh obyazatel'stv // Grazhdansko-pravovye obyazatel'stva: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Sb. nauch. tr. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2001. S. 45. 5. O. Mounir, La Moudawana, le nouveau droit de la famille au Maroc: présentation et analyse . Marsam Editions. 2005. 181 p. 6. Antokol'skaya M.V. Semeĭnoe pravo. M., 1996. C. 31 7. Nizamieva O.N. (otv. red.) Kommentariy k Semeynomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). M.: Prospekt, 2008 S. 267. 8. M. Blitz, N. Gallus, J.-P. Masson, J.-L. Renchon, J. Sosson, A.-Ch. Van Gysel, P. Wautelet. États Généraux du droit de la famille: Actualités juridiques et judiciaires de la famille en 2014. Primento. 2014. 254 p. |