Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Karpovich O.G. Characteristics of the modern North American federalism (on the example of the United States)

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the characteristics of the formation and the analysis of the state of the modern model of federalism in the United States of America. The object of this research is the U. S. federalism, which are the form of the government structure of the current United States, as well as the political and historical trends and regularities of the formation of the modern (so-called “competitive”) model of federal government in the U. S. The subject of this research is the forms, methods, and instruments of establishment of federal relations in the United States at the present stage. The goal is to determine the characteristics of the formation and the key aspect of the modern model of the North American federalism. The author pays attention to the fact that the federalism model of the current United States is the result of a long evolution of various ideas and concepts of organization of a complex society. It is the United State that gave the world the four classic concepts of federalism: dualistic, cooperative, technocratic, and competitive, which became the standard for federal structuring in many countries of the world. The modern federalism model in the United States, which represents a new stage in development and modernization of the competitive federalism model, undoubtedly has its flaws and contradictions. But namely the special qualities of this model ensure a determined establishment of U. S. national interests throughout the world and are the foundation of their soft and smart power.


Keywords:

diplomacy, international relations, U. S. foreign policy, world politics, society, political system, interests, state, security, USA


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Mishin A.L. Printsip razdeleniya vlastey v konstitutsionnom mekhanizme SShA. – M., 1984.
2. Sogrin V.V. Tsentral'nye problemy istorii SShA. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' mir», 2013. – 352 s.
3. Gerston L.N. American Federalism: A Concise Introduction. – M.E. Sharpe, 1997. – 197 p.
4. The Articles of Confederation – Primary Documents in American History. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/articles.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.201)
5. Shpotov B. M. Fermerskoe dvizhenie v SShA. – M., 1982.
6. Alden J. R. George Washington: A Biography. – LSU Press, 1996. – 326 p.
7. Istoriya SShA. Khrestomatiya: posobie dlya vuzov/sost. E. A. Ivanyan. – 2-e izd., stereotip. – M.: Drofa, 2007. – 399 s.
8. Lafitskiy V. I. Konstitutsionnyy stroy SShA. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Statut, 2011. – 351 s.
9. Konstitutsiya SShA. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Konstitutsiya_SShA (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
10. How far do the powers of Congress under the various grants extend? [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/congpowers.htm (data obrashcheniya: 11.12.2015)
11. Anti-Federalists//Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition. — New York: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc, 1911. — T. 2.
12. Orbach B., Callahan K. S., Lindemenn L. M. Arming States’ Rights: Federalism, Private Lawmakers, and the Battering Ram Strategy//Arizona Law Review. – Vol 52, 2010.
13. States’ Rights. D. Jonathan White, University of Alabama.//Encyclopedia of Alabama. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/h-2367 (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
14. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 137 137 (1803). [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
15. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 1 Wheat. 304 304 (1816). [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/14/304/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
16. McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 4 Wheat. 316 316 (1819). [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/17/316/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
17. Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 9 Wheat. 1 1 (1824). [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/22/1/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 11.12.2015)
18. Lowi T. J. The End of the Republican Era. – University of Oklahoma Press, 2006. – 275 p.
19. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/317/111/case.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
20. Hills Jr. R. M. The Political Economy of Cooperative Federalism: Why State Autonomy Makes Sense and «Dual Federalism» Doesn't//Michigan Law Review. – Vol. 96, No. 4, 1997.
21. Flynn J. T. The Roosevelt Myth. – Mises Institute, 2008. – 437 p.
22. O’Connor K., Sabato L. J. American Government continuity and change. – New York: Pearson Longman. 2008.
23. Orbach B., Callahan K. S., Lindemenn L. M. Arming States’ Rights: Federalism, Private Lawmakers, and the Battering Ram Strategy//Arizona Law Review. – Vol 52, 2010.
24. Herbert, Bob (October 6, 2005). «Impossible, Ridiculous, Repugnant».//The New York Times. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04E6DF1E30F935A35753C1A9639C8B63 (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
25. What Caused the Civil War? (May 18, 2011)//PewResearchCenter. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/what-caused-the-civil-war/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
26. Waldman, Paul (July 30, 2015). «Why marijuana legalization is the rare issue that divides the 2016 Republican presidential field».//The Week. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://theweek.com/articles/569009/why-marijuana-legalization-rare-issue-that-divides-2016-republican-presidential-field (data obrashcheniya: 10.01.2016)
27. Manoylo A.V. Paradigmy upravleniya mezhdunarodnymi konfliktami: konkurentsiya ili konfrontatsiya. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2011. ¹ 5. S. 135-142.
28. Manoylo A.V. Rol' tsvetnykh revolyutsiy v demontazhe sovremennykh politicheskikh rezhimov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2014. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.12058
29. Manoylo A.V. Politicheskie konflikty v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoy politike. //Mir i Politika. 2013. ¹2. S. 71-82.
30. Filippov V.R. Deetnizatsiya territoriy v noveyshey istorii Rossii // Federalizm. 2006. ¹ 2. S. 125-142.
31. Filippov V.R. Sovetskaya teoriya etnosa. Istoriograficheskiy ocherk. M., 2010. 214 s.
32. Gyuler K. Bel'giyskiy federalizm kak forma upravleniya etnopoliticheskimi konfliktami // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 426 - 430. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17196.
33. Kuznetsov I.I. Vliyanie demonstratsionnykh effektov na stanovlenie politicheskikh institutov // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 412 - 425. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17162.
34. Aryamova A.D. Prakticheskaya realizatsiya tekhnologiy tsvetnykh revolyutsiy v Ukraine v 2004 i 2014 gg.: sravnitel'nyy analiz // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 439 - 442. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17179.
35. Bocharnikov I.V. Terroristicheskaya gruppirovka «Islamskoe gosudarstvo» kak zakonomernoe sledstvie blizhnevostochnoy strategii SShA // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 4. - C. 395 - 402. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.17007.
36. Kuznetsov I.I. Politicheskaya pragmatika imperii: retsenziya na knigu Gerfrida Myunklera "Imperii: Logika gospodstva nad mirom – ot Drevnego Rima i do SShA" // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 454 - 460. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.16977.
37. Fedyakin I.V. Megapolisy kak sub'ekty politiki: istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 88 - 93. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10165.
38. Lasariya A.O. Noveyshiy etap formirovaniya abkhazskoy gosudarstvennosti // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2015. - 4. - C. 430 - 435. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.4.17156.
39. Manoylo A.V. Rol' strategiy upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 638 - 651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
40. Karpovich O.G. Global'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v kontekste formiruyushchegosya mnogopolyarnogo mira // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 620 - 629. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11787.
41. Valiullin I.I. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «informatsionnaya voyna» v politicheskoy nauke // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 68 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10064.
42. Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
43. ot doktriny Monro k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
44. Guan'tsyun' L. Rol' tayvan'skoy problemy v morskoy politike KNR // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 469 - 509. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9754.