|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Vinokurov A.Yu.
Ruling No. 2-P of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation from February 17, 2015 and the importance of its resolutive part for the theory and practice of prosecutor’s supervision
// Law and Politics.
2015. ¹ 10.
P. 1427-1432.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52514
Vinokurov A.Yu. Ruling No. 2-P of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation from February 17, 2015 and the importance of its resolutive part for the theory and practice of prosecutor’s supervisionAbstract: The subject of this study is the positions of the resolutive part of the ruling No. 2-P of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which, upon examination of complaints and results of a session, rendered a number of important positions, called to define the vectors of development of science in prosecution for the foreseeable future, as well as influence the correction of law enforcement practice in the work of prosecutors carrying out the oversight of law obedience. In the process of studying the key positions of the resolutive part of the examined ruling, the author compares the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation with the current law enforcement practice, as well as the theoretical views within prosecution. The main conclusions of the conducted research come to the fact the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in its ruling confirmed the legality of a number of current behavioral models of prosecutors in carrying out oversight of law obedience, and in some instances even exceeded expectations. Keywords: Lawfulness, Law obedience, Constitutional Court, Prosecutor’s office, Prosecutor’s power, Ruling, Legal position, Inspection, Prosecutor, Prosecutor’s supervision
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. SZ RF. – 2015. – ¹ 9. – St. 1389.
2. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami). 3. Vinokurov A.Yu. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 17.02.2015 ¹ 2-P i znachimost' ego opisatel'noy chasti dlya teorii i praktiki proku-rorskogo nadzora // 4. SZ RF. – 1994. – ¹ 13. – St. 1447 (s posled. izmeneniyami). 5. Punkt 15 prikaza General'nogo prokurora RF ot 07.12.2007 ¹ 195 «Ob organiza-tsii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov, soblyudeniem prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina» // Zakonnost'. – 2008. – ¹ 3 (s posled. izmeneniyami). 6. Vinokurov A.Yu. Faktor sderzhivaniya v nadzornoy deyatel'nosti prokurora // Zako-ny Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2011. – ¹ 3. 7. SZ RF. – 2015. – ¹ 10. – St. 1391. 8. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 9. SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1 (s posled. izmeneniyami). |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
