|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Pochtarev A.A.
The place of means of influencing a debtor within the system of methods of ensuring fulfillment of obligations non-defined in Chapter 23 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
// Law and Politics.
2015. ¹ 6.
P. 885-891.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52450
Pochtarev A.A. The place of means of influencing a debtor within the system of methods of ensuring fulfillment of obligations non-defined in Chapter 23 of the Civil Code of the Russian FederationAbstract: The subject of this research is the review and analysis of the non-defined means of influencing a debtor within the system of ensuring fulfillment of obligations, which are currently insufficiently researched within the science of civil law. The article also clarifies such notions as non-defined contract and all possible non-defined means and ways of affecting the debtor. The author also unravels and describes the important role of the institution of ensuring fulfillment of obligations. In this article the author uses and applies specific examples from precedent, as well as offers original classification of non-defined methods of ensuring fulfillment of obligations and illuminates the aspects of legislative regulation of each of the presented groups. The author comes to the conclusion that there is currently no clearly formulated mechanism for legal regulation of all non-defined means of ensuring fulfillment of obligation in civil legislation. Keywords: Obligations, Fulfillment of obligations, Non-defined means, Penalties, Down payment, Predetermined losses, Co-signing, Civil legislation, Socio-legal significance, Freedom of contract
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Mirnova P.V. O printsipe nezavisimosti obyazatel'stva garanta v bankovskoy garantii // Bankovskoe pravo. 2003. ¹ 1.
2. Skvortsov V.V. Vozmozhnosti povysheniya obespechitel'noy funktsii zaloga za schet izmeneniya norm zakonodatel'stva o zaloge // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2002. ¹ 1. 3. Gongalo B.M. Obespechenie ispolneniya obyazatel'stv. M., 1999. S. 145-151 4. Arkhipov A., Kucherov A. Novye sposoby obespecheniya // EZh-Yurist. ¹ 22. 2003. S. 3 5. Postanovleniya Plenuma VAS RF ot 14.03.2014 ¹ 17 6. Gracheva I.V., Samsonova A.E. Gosudarstvennaya garantiya: sootnoshenie chastnopravovykh i publichno-pravovykh nachal. Opredelenie Primorskogo kraevogo suda ot 27.01.2014 po delu ¹ 33-1; 7. Tanaga A.N. Svoboda vybora vida zaklyuchaemogo dogovora // YuRIT-Vestnik. ¹ 7, 2002. S. 101-110 8. Novitskaya T. E. Grazhdanskiy kodeks RSFSR 1922 goda. M.: Zertsalo-M, 2002. S. 91. 9. Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie: proekt / Pod red. I. M. Tyutryumova. T.II. SPb., 1910. S. 177. 10. Pobedonostsev K.P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Chast' tret'ya: Dogovory i obyazatel'stva. M.: Statut, 2003.S. 60-61. 11. Antimonov B.S., Grave K.A. Dogovor trudovogo porucheniya // Uchenye zapiski VIYuN 1955. Vyp. 3. S. 17. 12. Oygenzikht V.A. Netipichnye dogovornye otnosheniya v grazhdanskom prave. Dushanbe, 1984. S. 4 – 19. 13. Braginskiy M.I. Osnovy ucheniya o nepoimenovannykh (bezymyannykh) i smeshannykh dogovorakh. M.: Statut, 2007. 14. Soyko R.P. Osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya bankovskoy garantii // Bankovskoe pravo. 2002. ¹ 4. 15. Komissarova E. G., Torkin D. A. Nepoimenovannye sposoby obespecheniya obyazatel'stv v grazhdanskom prave. – M., 2008. – S.101 16. Khokhlov V. A. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie dogovora po grazhdanskomu pravu. – Tol'yati, 1997. – S.245 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
