Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Ponazhev Yu.O. The problems resulting from dissolution of a loan agreement

Abstract: The subject of this research is the legal consequences resulting from dissolution of a loan agreement. The author examines the main methods of dissolving a loan agreement. This research presents an analysis of issues that emerge in legal precedent due to dissolution of loan agreements, including the information on which violations of a loan agreement can serve as sufficient grounds to request the dissolution, while the loan agreement can be dissolved as a result of significant changes in the circumstances. The article presents legal precedent on each of the means of dissolving a loan agreement. The author proposes criteria for allowing dissolution of a loan agreement due to significant violations of the agreement or changes in the circumstances. The author concludes that there are three main ways of dissolving a loan agreement, and states that the permissibility of dissolution of the credit agreement in each specific case can only be resolved by analyzing the legal precedent. 


Keywords:

Legal relations, Loan agreement, Dissolution of a loan agreement, Termination of contract, Breach of contract, Change of circumstances, Early payoff, Unilateral refusal, Reimbursement of losses, Extending credit


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast' pervaya. Federal'nyy zakon ot 30 noyabrya 1994 goda ¹ 51-FZ.
2. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast' vtoraya. Federal'nyy zakon ot 26 yanvarya 1996 goda ¹ 14-FZ.
3. Grishaev S. P. Kreditnyy dogovor: soderzhanie, vidy, ispolnenie. // «Bibliotechka «Rossiyskoy gazety». Vypusk ¹8. 2011.
4. Danilenko S.A., Komissarova M.V. Bankovskoe potrebitel'skoe kreditovanie: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie.-M.: Yustitsinform, 2011.
5. Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 29 dekabrya 2001 goda ¹ 65 «Obzor praktiki razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh s prekrashcheniem obyazatel'stv zachetom vstrechnykh odnorodnykh trebovaniy»
6. Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 13 sentyabrya 2011 goda ¹ 147 «Obzor sudebnoy praktiki razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii o kreditnom dogovore»
7. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 8 noyabrya 2011 goda ¹ 46-V11-20
8. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 iyunya 2013 goda ¹ 18-KG13-42
9. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 3 aprelya 2001 goda ¹ 18-V01-12
10. Opredelenie VAS RF ot 4 marta 2013 goda ¹ VAS-1595/13 po delu ¹ A75-1308/2012.
11. Opredelenie VAS RF ot 12 dekabrya 2007 g. ¹ 16453/07 po delu ¹ A32-27767/2006-55/457
12. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 25 marta 2011 goda ¹ KG-A40/1415-11
13. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 7 iyulya 2010 goda ¹ KG-A40/6711-10
14. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 29 oktyabrya 2013 goda po delu ¹ A55-35359/2012
15. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24 avgusta 1999 goda po delu ¹ F04/1708-558/A45-99
16. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 15 iyunya 1999 goda ¹ 1020/99
17. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 20 noyabrya 2008 goda ¹ F09-8595/08-S5 po delu ¹ A60-3213/2008-S2
18. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 25 maya 2010 goda ¹ KG-A40/4667-10.
19. Praktika primeneniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF chastey vtoroy i tret'ey. Pod red. Belova V. A. – M.: Yurayt, 2009.
20. Sevast'yanova Yu. V. Odnostoronnee rastorzhenie kreditnogo dogovora. // «Bankovskoe kreditovanie», ¹ 3, 2014