Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Antonova A.M. General characteristics of the electoral legislation of Russia and three constituents of the Russian Federation of the Volga Federal Region (Republic of Tatarstan, Republic of Bashkortostan, and Samara Oblast)

Abstract: This article presents a comparison of the electoral laws of the constituents of the Russian Federation with the federal electoral legislation. More specifically, the article presents the analysis of the peculiarities of the structure of electoral legislation of the Republic of Tatarstan, Republic of Bashkortostan, and Samara Oblast. The work examines the inner content of the above legal norms. The conducted research allows us to determine the present state of this legislation and its place within the system of constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation. As a result of the conducted research the author formulates the main conclusions of the following facts: - The regional electoral legislation fully complies with the federal electoral legislation;- The regional electoral legislation is constantly being improved and corresponds with the current political situation within the country;- The electoral legislation of the national government formations (republics) is much more similar in structure and content than that of the territorial formations (krai, oblast).


Keywords:

Elections, Federal electoral legislation, Electoral system, Referendum, Regional electoral legislation, Electoral law institution, Passive electoral right, Governor, Municipal elections, Principle of uniformity


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. A. E. Lyubarev. Sistemnaya vzaimosvyaz' osnovnykh parametrov proportsional'noy izbiratel'noy sistemy // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107
2. M. O. Gvozdeva. Mezhdunarodnyy i rossiyskiy opyt Internet-golosovaniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
3. N. S. Ursu. Ispol'zovanie tekhnologiy politicheskogo manipulirovaniya v SMI v khode kampanii po vyboram deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy VI sozyva // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
4. Kashkina E.V., Vorob'eva T.I.. Problemy vzaimodeystviya organov vnutrennikh del s izbiratel'nymi komissiyami pri podgotovke i provedenii vyborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
5. V. V. Trofimov. Formy uchastiya struktur grazhdanskogo obshchestva v pravoobrazuyushchikh otnosheniyakh // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
6. Yu. A. Golovin. Publichnaya politika kak prostranstvo legitimatsii vlasti (na primere Yaroslavskoy oblasti) // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
7. Yu. A. Golovin. Zashchita politicheskoy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty problemy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
8. A.S. Cafonova. Politicheskoe soznanie molodezhi v vybornom protsesse (na primere g. Sankt-Peterburga) // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107.
9. A. V. Ignatov. Shestoe izdanie Rukovodstva po nablyudeniyu za vyborami BDIPCh OBSE: na puti k reforme instituta mezhdunarodnogo nablyudeniya // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107.
10. Belyaev A.Yu.. Zakonomernosti izbiratel'nogo protsessa, ikh ispol'zovanie v issledovatel'skoy praktike // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.6.8052.
11. Kosorukov A.A.. Novye media kak instrument politicheskoy transformatsii v sovremennom mire // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.3.7594.
12. Mateykovich M.S., Suchilin V.N.. Izbiratel'nye organy v Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost' // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9667.
13. Matrenina K.Yu.. Primenenie kompleksov obrabotki izbiratel'nykh byulleteney pri golosovanii: zashchita ot fal'sifikatsii ili skrytoe sredstvo dlya iskazheniya rezul'tatov // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.11.10101.
14. Lyubarev A.E.. Sootvetstvuyut li rossiyskie vybory svoemu konstitutsionnomu prednaznacheniyu // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 13. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.13.10158.
15. Kravchenko O.A.. Usloviya obespecheniya konstitutsionnogo printsipa dostovernosti opredeleniya voleiz'yavleniya naroda // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.11.10047.
16. M.A. Riekkinen. Uchastie grazhdan v upravlenii gosudarstvom: mezhdunarodno-pravovoy aspekt // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.01.12.
17. Lyubarev A.E. Aktivnost' izbirateley na federal'nykh, regional'nykh i munitsipal'nykh vyborakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-8.-C. 138-209. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.8.8778. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_8778.html
18. Lyubarev A.E. Proportsional'naya i smeshannaya izbiratel'nye sistemy na regional'nykh i munitsipal'nykh vyborakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy «sfabrikovannogo bol'shinstva» // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-8.-C. 65-118. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.8.9212. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9212.html