Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Korotkih N.N. The specifi c aspects associated with giving amnesty to persons convicted of multiple crimes

Abstract: In implementing the acts of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on amnesty, the question arises whether it includes persons convicted of multiple crimes. With regards to those convicted for multiple offences the amnesty carries a certain specificity of implementation of the criminal legal norms. The consequences of amnesty in setting punishment or granting impunity from the remainder of the sentence for multiple offences, or repetitive crimes, in the case of several individual sentences are not regulated by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The implementation of acts of amnesty regarding persons convicted of multiple crimes is being demonstrated by the example of some specific court rulings. The extent of the legal consequences of implementing acts of amnesty, from impunity from criminal responsibility and punishment, to omitting criminal record, requires more thorough regulation within the acts on amnesty, and a clear order of necessary conditions when applying this institution to the persons who have committed multiple offences.

Keywords:

Multiple offences, act of amnesty, repetitive crimes, legal responsibility, criminal punishment, expungement, implementation of amnesty, consequences of amnesty.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Luneev V.V. Prestupnost' KhKh veka: mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendentsii. M., 2005. – 912 s.
2. Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy FS RF ot 26 maya 2000 g. «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii.-2000.-¹ 22.-St. 2287.
3. Malkov V.P. Sovokupnost' prestupleniy (voprosy kvalifikatsii i naznacheniya nakazaniya) / Izbrannye trudy. V 3 t. T.2. Kazan': Izd-vo «Poznanie», 2011. – 524 s.
4. Malkov V.P. Osvobozhdenie ot nakazaniya kak osnovanie annulirovaniya sudimosti // Izbrannye trudy. V 3 t. T.1. Kazan': Izd-vo «Poznanie», 2011. – 483 s.
5. Grishko A.Ya. Amnistiya i pomilovanie. Ryazan': Akademiya prava i upravleniya FSIN, 2006. – 199 s.
6. Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy FS RF ot 30 noyabrya 2001 g. «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh i zhenshchin» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2001. 4 dek.
7. Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy FS RF ot 19 aprelya 2006 g. «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi so 100-letiem uchrezhdeniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy v Rossii» //Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2006. 23 sent.
8. Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoy Dumy FS RF ot 18 dekabrya 2013 g. «Ob ob'yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 20-letiem prinyatiya Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2013. 18 dek.
9. Seliverstov I.V. Pravo osuzhdennogo na rassmotrenie materialov o ego osvobozhdenii iz ispravitel'nogo uchrezhdeniya po aktu amnistii v ustanovlennyy srok //Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie.-2011.-¹ 13.-S. 21-24.
10. Sverchkov V.V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti, prekrashchenie ugolovnogo dela (presledovaniya), otkaz v ego vozbuzhdenii: problemy teorii i praktiki. SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2008. – 586 s.
11. Sotnikov S.A. Amnistiya v ugolovnom prave Rossii. M.: Prospekt, 2010. – 368 s.
12. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordoviya po delu ¹ 44-u-53 [Elektronnyy resurs] // RosPravosudie-https://rospravosudie.com/court-verxovnyj-sud-respubliki-mordoviya-respublika-mordoviya-s/act-105219174/ (data obrashcheniya 27 marta 2014 g.).
13. Postanovlenie suda nadzornoy instantsii g. Rostov-na-Donu po delu ¹44-u-618 [Elektronnyy resurs] // RosPravosudie.-https://rospravosudie.com/court-rostovskij-oblastnoj-sud (data obrashcheniya 26 marta 2014 g.)
14. Postanovlenie prezidiuma Samarskogo oblastnogo suda po delu ¹44u/155-2010 [Elektronnyy resurs] // RosPravosudie.-https://rospravosudie.com/court-samarskij-oblastnoj-sud (data obrashcheniya 26 marta 2014 g.).
15. Postanovlenie prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Tatarstan po delu ¹ 44-u-291 [Elektronnyy resurs] // RosPravosudie.-https://rospravosudie.com/court-verxovnyj-sud-respubliki-tatarstan (data obrashcheniya 26 marta 2014 g.)
16. Postanovlenie prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kareliya po delu ¹ 44-u-66/2011 [Elektronnyy resurs] // RosPravosudie.-https://rospravosudie.com/court-verxovnyj-sud-respubliki-kareliya (data obrashcheniya 26 marta 2013 g.).
17. Khachatryan A.K. Amnistiya kak vid osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 10. - C. 1576 - 1581. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.10.13075.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.