Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Khramova T.M. The functional potential of the freedom of assembly: formal attribute or the irreplaceable element of modern democracy?

Abstract: The freedom of assembly, despite its constitutional recognition as one of the main liberties, seems to attract a lot of attention of the legislators from the perspective of establishing limitations. The constitutional significance of this liberty, as well as the necessity and adequacy of the enacted limitations are evaluated through the prism of the functions performed by the freedom of assembly. The author highlights three main functions: communicative, “uniting”, and the function of “emotional relief”. They collectively define the essence of this liberty and the special nature of its legal regulation. The analysis of the functional potential of the freedom of assembly convinces the author in the uniqueness and irreplaceability of this liberty in a modern democratic state. The limitations of the freedom of assembly justified by the risks of its realization can only be considered as acceptable when they do not infringe on its ability to effectively carry out each of the stated functions.


Keywords:

Constitutional Court, complex legislation, function of emotional relief, function of forming an identity, communicative function, freedom of assembly, limitation of rights, individual right, collective right, protest.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Maslennikova S.V. Narodnoe predstavitel'stvo i prava grazhdan v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M.: OOO «Gorodets-izdat», 2001. S. 43.
2. Shaio A. Sderzhivanie strastei: sobraniya, religiya i narodnyi suverenitet // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. ¹ 5 (84) 2011. S. 156. 9. Buyantueva R.S. Svoboda manifestatsii i ee realizatsiya na sovremennom etape razvitiya rossiiskogo obshchestva: sotsial'no-filosofskii analiz: diss. ... kand. filos. nauk. Ulan-Ude, 2011. S. 10. Knyazeva I.I. K voprosu o ponyatii i sushchnosti fleshmoba kak odnoi iz form provedeniya publichnykh meropriyatii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. ¹8 (SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus»); 11. Webster J. How flash mob flamenco took on the banks // URL.: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22110887. 12. Ushakov A.V. Pravo na provedenie publichnykh meropriyatii i ego sootnoshenie s drugimi konstitutsionnymi pravami i svobodami cheloveka i grazhdanina // Akademicheskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2007. ¹ 4. S. 22, 28. 13. Sivoplyas A.V. Yuridicheskaya priroda i mekhanizm realizatsii svobody manifestatsii (sobranii, mitingov, ulichnykh shestvii, demonstratsii, pikitirovanii i drugikh publichnykh aktsii) v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Avtoref. diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk, Ekaterinburg, 1993. S.7; 14. Lebedev V.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya okhrana i zashchita prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossii. M: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2005. S. 24; 15. Yakovenko M.A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo grazhdan Rossiiskoi Federatsii na provedenie publichnykh meropriyatii: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty. / Avtoref. diss… k.yu.n.. M., 2012. S. 17. 16. Nudnenko L.A. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya konstitutsionnogo prava grazhdanina Rossii na publichnye meropriyatiya // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2006, ¹ 6. S.6 17. Yakovenko M.A. Pravo na provedenie sobranii, mitingov, demonstratsii, shestvii i piketirovanii v sisteme konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2009. ¹ 3 (SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus»). 18. Smilov D. The Power of Assembled People: The Right to Assembly and Political Representation / Free To Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstration / Ed. by Andras Sajo. Boom Eleven International, 2009. P. 87. 19. Khesse K. Osnovy konstitutsionnogo prava FRG // M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1981. S. 202-203. 20 Dorsen, N., Rosenfeld, M., Sajo, A., Baer S. Comparative Constitutionalism: Cases and Materials (2nd ed.) West Law School, 2010. P. 981. 21. Raz, J. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics // Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. P. 153. 22. Gyorfi T. The Importance of Freedom of Assembly: Three Models of Justification / Free To Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstration / Ed. by Andras Sajo. Boom Eleven International, 2009. P. 6. 23. Schmitt C. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy (translated by Ellen Kennedy). Cambrige, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985. pp. 16-17. 24, Avak'yan S.A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii: Uchebnyi kurs. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – V 2 t. T.1. M.: Yurist'', 2007. S.620; Chirkin V.E. Individ i obshchestvo: kollektivnye konstitutsionnye prava. Esse // Pravo i politika.-M.: Nota Bene, 2001, ¹ 4. S. 92-93. 25. Sanders, D. Collective rights / Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 13, No.3 (Aug.1991), p.369 (perevod moi – T.Kh.). 26. Le Bon, G. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1896, pp. 54-56. / Elektronnaya versiya na angliiskom yazyke dostupna na URL.: http://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/BonCrow.html. 27. Moskovichi S. Vek tolp. Istoricheskii traktat po psikhologii mass. / Per. s fr.-M.: «Tsentr psikhologii i psikhoterapii», 1998. S. 40. 28. Sunstein, Cass R. Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes // The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 110 (2000), pp. 71-119. 29. Plevako N.F. Izbrannye rechi. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Yurait», 2008. S. 639.
3. Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Kurs v 2-kh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Yurid.lit., 1982. S.117.
4. Dicey, A.V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 1902. pp. 267-268 (perevod s angl. moi – T.Kh.).
5. Blankenagel' A., Levin I. Svoboda sobranii i mitingov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii – sdelano v SSSR?: «Luchshe my ne mozhem» ili «Po-drugomu ne khotim»? // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. ¹ 2 (93) 2013. S. 59.
6. Barendt E. Freedom of Assembly / Chapter 9 in Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Essays in Honour of Sir David Williams, edited by J.Beatson and Y.Cripps. Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 162.