Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Nikiforov A.A. Possibilities and limitations of protest mobilization through the social networks

Abstract: The subject of this research is the effect of Internet-based social networks upon the emergence, dynamics, and specificity of the process of protest mobilization. The object of this research is the mass mobilization during the course of revolutionary processes and massive antigovernment campaigns. The author examines the possibilities of political mobilization through the social networks in Russia based on the conducted research of user behavior of the popular Russian social network VK. A special attention is given to the problem of spontaneous occurrences of mass protests, as well as the modern dynamics of the events of “Arab Spring” and appearance of the “Occupy” movement within the context of political science. The empirical part of the research is conducting using the descriptive method and statistical analysis of media behavior of the VK users. The theoretical analysis relies on the results of modern research in the field of media and communication studies, social movements, and conflict politics. The main conclusions of this research is firstly, affirmation of limited influence of the social network VK upon involvement of the youth into a mass protest in Russia; secondly, the general supplemental role of the social networks into the process of protest mobilization in the cases of typical political conflicts. On the other hand, the conducted analysis allows us to substantiate the possibility of a quality influence of social networks upon the dynamics of mass protests in the case of emergence of exceptional events that are transgressive for public consciousness, where the “new media” instruments are able to rapidly synchronize local demands, change their scale, and involve broad social groups into the message of protest and the culture of social opposition. The novelty of this research consists in refutation of the thesis of exceptionally high influence of social networks onto the forming of mass protest the ideal-political perceptions within youth. Alternatively, the results of this analysis allow defining the future directions of research on the causes and dynamic characteristics of the mass protests.


Keywords:

Protest, mobilization, information, social networks, VK, youth, social movements, conflict politics, Arab Spring, revolution.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Koopmans R. Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention // The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements / ed. by D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. – P. 19-46.
2. Juris J. S. Reflections on# Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation //American Ethnologist. – 2012. – T. 39. – ¹. 2. – P. 259-279.
3. Kahn R., Kellner D. New media and internet activism: From the 'Battle of Seattle' to blogging //New media & society. – 2004. – T. 6. – ¹. 1. – P. 87-95.
4. New media, campaigning and the 2008 Facebook election / ed. by T. J. Johnson et al. – Routledge, 2013. – 130 p.
5. Dynamics of Contention / ed. by D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, M. N. Zald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. – 387 p.
6. Froehling O. The cyberspace «war of ink and internet» in Chiapas, Mexico //Geographical Review. – 1997. – T. 87. – ¹. 2. – P. 291-307.
7. Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements / ed. by. W. Van De Donk et al. – Routledge, 2004. – 316 p.
8. Brinton C. The Anatomy of Revolution:-Rev. and Expanded Ed. – Vintage, 1965. – 310 p.
9. Bakshy E., Karrer B., Adamic L. A. Social influence and the diffusion of user-created content //Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. – ACM, 2009. – P. 325-334.
10. Reingol'd G. Umnaya tolpa: novaya sotsial'naya revolyutsiya. – M. : GRAND, 2006. – 416 c.
11. Aouragh M., Alexander A. The egyptian experience: Sense and nonsense of the internet revolution //International Journal of communication. – 2011. – T. 5. – P. 1344-1358.
12. Parker N. Parallaksy: revolyutsii i «revolyutsiya» v global'nom predstavlenii //Kontsept «Revolyutsiya» v sovremennom politicheskom diskurse / pod red. L. E. Blyakhera, B. V. Mezhueva, A. V. Pavlova. – SPb. : Aleteiya, 2008. – C. 163-184.
13. Kurochkin A. V. Politika v usloviyakh setevogo obshchestva: novaya struktura i soderzhanie // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2011. ¹ 3. S. 113-117.
14. Kurochkin A. V. Stanovlenie setevoi modeli politiko-administrativnogo upravleniya v usloviyakh sovremennogo obshchestva // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Filosofiya. Kul'turologiya. Politologiya. Pravo. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2011. ¹ 2. S. 115-123.
15. Garr T. R. Pochemu lyudi buntuyut. – Piter, 2005. – 461 c.
16. Doverie i nedoverie v usloviyakh razvitiya grazhdanskogo obshchestva / otv. red. A. B. Kupreichenko, I. V. Mersiyanovoi. – M. : Izdatel'skii dom NIU VShE, 2013. – 564 c.
17. VKontakte [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: www.vk.com (data obrashcheniya: 21.10.2014).
18. Lotan G. et al. The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions //International Journal of Communication. – 2011. – T. 5. – P. 1375-1405.
19. O'Neill M., Seal L. Transgressive imaginations: Crime, deviance and culture. – Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. – 187 p.
20. Routledge handbook of Internet politics / ed. by A. Chadwick, P. N. Howard– Taylor & Francis, 2010. – 512 p.
21. Ugander J. et al. The anatomy of the facebook social graph //arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.4503. – 2011. – P. 1-17.
22. Wilson C., Dunn A. Digital Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Descriptive Analysis from the Tahrir Data Set //International Journal of Communication. – 2011. – T. 5. – P. 1248-1272.
23. Wray S. On electronic civil disobedience //Peace Review. – 1999. – T. 11. – ¹. 1. – P. 107-111.