Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Shkel’ S.N.
Political regimes of the post-Soviet states of the Central Asia
and Caucasus
// Law and Politics.
2014. ¹ 12.
P. 1835-1839.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52316
Shkel’ S.N. Political regimes of the post-Soviet states of the Central Asia and CaucasusAbstract: The subject of this research is the political regimes of the post-Soviet states of Central Asia and Caucasus. The author gives an in-depth analysis to the typology problems of the modern political regimes and the methodological aspects of measuring the regime dynamics. Special attention is given to the issue of operationalization of the proposed concepts and review of empirical data, which can objectively reflect the character of the political regimes. The author claims that the measurement of these two parameters: level of competition among the elites and the degree of influence of informal practices within the political process, represents the most relevant assessment of the regime forms of the post-Soviet states. A synthesis of two theoretical concepts is used in this article. It offers the typology of the political regimes, developed upon the electoral and neopatrimonial approaches. By combining the two basic variables (level of competition and the autonomy of the elites) six possible regime types are determined: atomized particularism, sultanism, neopatrimonial authoritarianism, neopatrimonial polyarchy, institutionalized authoritarianism and institutionalized polyarchy. For the offered criteria of the assessment of the regimes, the author formulates a method of operationalization using the data from the electoral statistics and indexing the levels of corruption. The regime dynamics of the post-Soviet Turkmenistan is presented in the article as a demonstration of the practical implementation of the developed typology. Keywords: Political regime, typology, democracy, authoritarianism, political process, post-Soviet territory, neopatrimonialism, Central Asia, Caucasus, Turkmenistan.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Dobronravin N. Turkmenistan : velikoe odinochestvo // SSSR posle raspada / red. O. L. Marganiya. SPb. : Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 2007. S. 455-476.
2. Lazarev E.A. Korruptsiya i politicheskaya stabil'nost' : institutsional'naya perspektiva // Politiya. 2011. ¹ 1 (60). S. 50-68. 3. Merkel' V., Kruassan A. Formal'nye i neformal'nye instituty v defektnykh demokratiyakh // Polis. 2002. ¹ 1. S. 617. 4. Mironyuk M.G., Timofeev I.N., Vaslavskii I.Ya. Universal'nye sravneniya s ispol'zovaniem kolichestvennykh metodov analiza (Obzor pretsedentov) // Polis. 2006. ¹ 5. S. 39-57. 5.Podvedeny itogi vyborov // Turmenistan : zoltoi vek [Elektronnyi dokument]. URL : http://turkmenistan.gov.tm/?id=5528 (data obrashcheniya : 25.01.2014). 6. TsIK Turkmenistana priznal Berdymukhamedova pobeditelem // Podrobnosti [Elektronnyi dokument]. URL : http://podrobnosti.ua/power/2012/02/16/820746.html (data obrashcheniya : 13.03.2013). 7. Grzymala-Busse A., Luong, P. Reconceptualizing the state : lessons from post-communism // Politics & Society. 2002. Vol. 30. ¹ 4. P. 529-544. 8. Hale H. Why Not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism, and the State. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 275 p. 9. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Methodology and Analytical Issues. The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team. Policy Research Working Paper. ¹ 5430. 2010. 29 p. 10. Montgomery K., Remington T. Regime transition and the 1990 Soviet republican elections// Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. 1994. Vol.10. ¹ 1. P. 55-79. 11. Sultanistic Regimes / ed. by H. E. Chehabi and J. Linz. Baltimore and London : The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1998. 284 p. 12. The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) : [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL : http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home (data obrashcheniya : 13.04.2013). 13. Transparency International [Elektronnyi dokument]. URL : http://www.transparency.org/ (data obrashcheniya : 11.03.2013). 14. Vanhanen T. The Emergence Of Democracy : A Comparative Study Of 119 States, 1850-1979. (Commentationes scientiarum socialium). Helsinki : Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 1984. 168 p. 15. Shkel' S.N. Protsedurnye faktory ustoichivosti avtoritarnykh rezhimov: kontseptual'naya ramka analiza // Pravo i politika.-2014.-6.-C. 799-806. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.6.12192. 16. S. N. Shkel', N. E. Gareeva Sovremennye metodologicheskie podkhody i teoreticheskie modeli issledovaniya politiko-rezhimnykh transformatsii na postsovetskom prostranstve // Pravo i politika.-2012.-1.-C. 156-162 |