Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Idrisov, I.T. Punishments regarding correctional labor in England and in France

Abstract: This article provides a complex comparative legal study of the measures of forced labor correction of convicts serving punishments without isolation from the society. Taking examples of England and France (representing Anglo-Saxon and Roman-German legal system) the author shows the tendency for the humanization of the applied criminal punishments. Since these two states belong to different legal families, there are some specificities regarding assignment and execution of alternative punishments (to imprisonment), regarding correctional labor, allowing to single out independent models of criminal law influence. At the same time similar measures may be accepted similarly in different states, which is due to the globalization of the criminal legal policy. In the process of studies the author applied various methods, such as analysis, synthesis, analogy, comparative and legal methods. The article contains references to English and French legislative sources translated by the author, as well as their comparative legal analysis. The author notes practical and theoretical value of foreign experience for the optimization of the system of punishments in Russia. The demand for the alternative punishments involving correctional labor corresponds to the main directions of criminal and penal policies of the modern states.

Keywords:

Humanization, alternative punishments, correctional labor, obligatory labor, punishments in foreign states, probation, penitentiary system, foreign legislation, execution of punishments, globalization.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Globalizatsiya v perspektive ustoychivogo budushchego // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-5.-C. 1-63. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.794. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_794.html
2. Zaychenko V. A. Al'ternativnye lisheniyu svobody nakazaniya kak sredstvo optimizatsii sistemy ugolovnykh nakazaniy v SShA: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2005.
3. Dvoryanskov I. V., Sergeeva V.V., Batalin D. E. Primenenie al'ternativnykh vidov nakazaniya v Zapadnoy Evrope, SShA i Rossii. Tsentr sodeystviya reforme ugolovnogo pravosudiya.-M., 2003.
4. Dvoryanskov I. V. Effektivnost' al'ternativnykh nakazaniy.-M., 2005.
5. Le travail d’intérêt general http://www.justice.gouv.fr/justice-des-mineurs-10042/le-travail-dinteret-general-22236.html
6. Le Travail d’Intérêt Général. Une alternative à l’incarcération. Direction de l’administration pénitentiaire http://www.vie-publique.fr/documents-vp/tig.pdf
7. Referral Order Guidance http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/youth-justice/referral-orders/referral-order-guidance.pdf
8. Code de procédure pénale de la France http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006071154&dateTexte=20120724
9. Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/4/contents
10. Children Act http://www.dcya.gov.ie/documents/YouthJustice/a2401.pdf
11. Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/6/section/8
12. About the National Offender Management Service http://www.justice.gov.uk/about/noms
13. Code penal de la France http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do;jsessionid=0DB32EF259C2F56294C051C8DB0A9B9D.tpdjo04v_3?idSectionTA=LEGISCTA000006181727&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070719&dateTexte=20100907
14. Joan Petersilla Probation in the USA http://www.appa-net.org/eweb/Resources/PPPSW_2013/docs/sp98pers30.pdf
15. Konventsiya o rabstve 1926 g. http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/convention_slavery.shtml
16. Criminal Justice Act 2003 http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/web_new_sentences_guideline1.pdf
17. Komakhin B.N.. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' sluzhashchikh za korruptsiyu // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10246
18. Savchenko D.A. Pravovaya zashchita bezopasnosti gosudarstva po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu srednevekovogo Kitaya // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2013.-5.-C. 891-897.
19. Siromakha O.V. O psikhologicheskoy neeffektivnosti nakazaniya kak vospitatel'nogo sredstva // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. — 2013.-¹ 8.-S.80-101. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2013.8.10636. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/psp/article_10636.html
20. Nikulin V.V. Pravosudie i politika: sootnoshenie politiki i prava v sovetskoy sisteme nakazaniy // NB: Istoricheskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 5.-S.1-59. DOI: 10.7256/2306-420X.2013.5.747. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/hr/article_747.html
21. Kukharuk V.V. Otsrochka otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey: voprosy teorii i realizatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.148-165. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.1.366. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_366.html
22. Afanasenko Ya.A. Vina: mezhdu nakazaniem i proshcheniem // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2012.-¹ 4.-S.129-178. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.4.245. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_245.html
23. Grishkovets A.A.. Diskvalifikatsiya gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10174
24. Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A.. Mery administrativnogo presecheniya i problemy ikh realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10597
25. Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. K voprosu o predostavlenii otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10038
26. Obydenov V.V.. K voprosu o soderzhanie obstoyatel'stv, smyagchayushchikh administrativnuyu otvetstven-nost' i ikh sootnoshenie s obstoyatel'stvami svyazannymi s osvobozhdeniem ot administrativnoy ot-vetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9717
27. Obydenov V.V.. Obstoyatel'stva smyagchayushchie administrativnuyu otvetstvennost' v yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.4.9582
28. Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E.A.. Voprosy vstupleniya v zakonnuyu silu postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9099
29. I. V. Shil'nikova. Nakazanie kak element sistemy stimulirovaniya truda rabochikh-tekstil'shchikov v Sovetskoy Rossii (1918–1929): opyt mikroanaliza // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2013.4.877
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.