Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Rotar, A.I. Function of the victim in criminal process in Russia

Abstract: The object of studies involves norms of international criminal legislation of Russia, decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, regulating procedural position of a victim in the criminal process of Russia, including analysis of role of victim among other participants, implemented function in the course of criminal judicial proceedings, correlation of the legal categories of “accusation” and “criminal prosecution”, specific features of implementation of specific directions of activities, as well as theoretical developments in this sphere, including scientific articles, dissertation studies and monographs of renowned procedural scholars. The methodological basis includes general scientific methods, such as a analysis and synthesis, method of systemic approach, as well as main conceptual provisions of the modern doctrine of international criminal law. The studies show that some authors call the function of a victim “accusation”, and others refer to “criminal prosecution”. The author analyzes the correlation of these categories drawing a conclusion that “criminal prosecution” should be regarded as part of “accusation”. The analysis of “accusation” as a function has allowed to draw a conclusion on its contents: criminal prosecution, formulation (presenting) an accusation, support of accusation in court. These directions of activities should be regarded as sub-functions of the main function of accusation. Specific features of procedural status of a victim allows to single out his capabilities in the sphere of said types of procedural activity. As a result a conclusion is made that while being the main participant of criminal judicial proceedings, the victim is one of the key participants of a trial, the official bodies and officers implement an obligation on protection and restoration of violated or limited rights, being obliged to initiate a criminal case, establish an accused person and support prosecution in trial. The article also offers a new text of Art. 22 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, the author considers that its title and contents should conform to other norms of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and the legal understanding of function of “accusation” as provided for in this article.


Keywords:

Victim, functions, sub-functions, interest, public prosecution, criminal prosecution, criminal judicial proceedings, procedural status, supporting prosecution.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. O. A. Tarnavskiy, O. S. Akulin Otdel'nye problemnye voprosy otnositel'no protsessual'noy figury poterpevshego v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2011.-12.-C. 2053-2056.
2. Yagofarov, F. M. Mekhanizm realizatsii funktsii obvineniya pri rassmotrenii dela sudom pervoy instantsii [Tekst] : dis. kand. yurid. nauk / F. M. Yagofarov. – 12.00.09. – Orenburg, 2003. – 150 s.
3. Fedotov, A. V. Ugolovnoe presledovanie vinovnogo kak garantiya okhrany prav i zakonnykh interesov lits, poterpevshikh ot prestupleniya [Tekst] / A. V. Fedotov // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2009. – N 3. – S. 14-18.
4. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti 2.1 st. 399 UPK RF v svyazi s zaprosom Ketovskogo rayonnogo suda Kurganskoy oblasti [Tekst] : [Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo suda RF ot 18 marta 2014 g. ¹ 5-P] // SZ RF. – 2014.-¹ 13. – St. 1526. – S. 3297-3304.
5. Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy chasti pervoy stat'i 237 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan B.T. Gadaeva i zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda [Tekst] : [Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 02 iyulya 2013 ¹ 16-P] // SZ RF. – 2013.-¹ 28. – St. 3881. – S. 7696-7707.
6. Larin, A. M. Rassledovanie po ugolovnomu delu: protsessual'nye funktsii [Tekst] / A. M. Larin. – M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1986. – 160 s.
7. Korkina, I. V. Protsessual'noe polozhenie poterpevshego v dosudebnom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Tekst] : avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk / I. V. Korkina. – 12.00.09. – M., 2006. – 32 s.
8. Zherebyat'ev, I. V. Lichnost' poterpevshego v sovremennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii [Tekst] / I. V. Zherebyat'ev. Monografiya. – Orenburg: RIK GOU OGU, 2004. – 220 s.
9. Kolukazakova, E. V. Uchastie poterpevshego, ego predstavitelya v ugolovnom presledovanii po delam publichnogo obvineniya [Tekst] : avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk / E. V. Kolukazakova. – 12.00.09. – N.Novgorod, 2008. – 34 s.
10. Velichko, I. V. Ponyatie poterpevshego i ego protsessual'no-pravovoy status po deystvuyushchemu ugolovno-protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Tekst] / I.V. Velichko // Obshchestvo i pravo. – 2011. – N 4. – S. 232-237.
11. Bozrov, V. M. K probleme metodologii v teorii protsessual'nykh funktsiy [Tekst] / V. M. Bozrov // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – 2011. – N
12. – S. 166-172. 3.Borodinova, T. G. Storona zashchity i ee funktsiya v sudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Tekst] / T. G. Borodinova. – Krasnodar: GOU VPO «Rossiyskaya akademiya pravosudiya», 2009. – 208 s.
13. Berova, D. M. Ponyatie i sistema funktsiy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Tekst] / D. M. Berova // Obshchestvo i pravo. – 2010. – N 4. – S. 224-232.
14. O.N. Selednikova Problemy obespecheniya vzyskaniya grazhdanskogo iska v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravo i politika.-2012.-12.-C. 2057-2060.
15. Fedorchenko A.A.. Pravovoe polozhenie zhertvy prestupleniya kak svidetelya v mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom protsesse // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11556
16. Titov P.S.. Ob uchastii zashchitnika v sobiranii dokazatel'stv // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.6.8077
17. Glushkov A.I.. Rol' prokurora v obespechenii realizatsii printsipa sostyazatel'nosti storon na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.05.14
18. Vinokurov A.Yu.. Administrativnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107.
19. Fedorchenko A.A. Protsessual'nye prava postradavshikh v sudebnykh razbiratel'stvakh mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov ad hoc // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-¹ 4.-S.208-224. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.4.11695. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11695.html
20. Kabanov P.A. Kriminal'naya politicheskaya viktimologiya kak mezhotraslevaya kriminologicheskaya teoriya: ponyatie, predmet, struktura i perspektivy razvitya v sovremennoy Rossii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-¹ 5.-S.218-232. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.5.201. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_201.html
21. Trunov I.L., Ayvar L.K.. Reshenie po delu o DTP na Leninskom prospekte g. Moskvy garantiruet sudebnuyu zashchitu umershim podozrevaemym // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107
22. O. A. Tarnavskiy, O. S. Akulin Otdel'nye problemnye voprosy
23. otnositel'no protsessual'noy figury
24. poterpevshego v ugolovnom
25. sudoproizvodstve Rossii // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 12. - C. 2053 - 2056.