Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Anisimov, I.O.
Correlation of the terms “underwater cultural heritage”
and “world cultural and natural heritage”
// Law and Politics.
2014. ¹ 7.
P. 996-1004.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52228
Anisimov, I.O. Correlation of the terms “underwater cultural heritage” and “world cultural and natural heritage”Abstract: The contents and topicality of this article are defined with the growing interest to the issue of the place of underwater cultural heritage within the concept of the world cultural and natural heritage. The object of studies involves the terms of “cultural heritage”, “natural heritage”, “underwater cultural heritage” as provided for by the UNESCO Conventions concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage of 1972 and on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage of 2001. The author finds out that these categories have certain defining criteria, such as importance, origin and authenticity. As a basic method the author applies comparative legal method. For the first time the author provides comparative analysis of the categories “underwater cultural heritage” and “world cultural and natural heritage” based upon a number of defining criteria: archaeological and historical value (importance), degree of value (importance), localization, origin, integrity and authenticity of an object and the temporal criterion. The scientific novelty of the study is due to revealing the common components in the said legal categories. The conclusion is made that the underwater cultural heritage is a part of world cultural heritage of a humanity in spite of its specificities due to localization of objects. It is manifested by a range of common defining criteria for the legal categories of “underwater cultural heritage” and “world cultural and natural heritage”, such as value, origin and authenticity of objects. The author draws an analogy between the role of the world cultural heritage in the development of human civilization and the universal value of underwater cultural heritage, which is manifested in cultural, scientific, technical, economic, eco-biological, social, and geopolitical aspects. Based upon the research the author formulates a conclusion on the need to develop criteria for the cultural, historical and archaeological importance for the objects of underwater cultural heritage in order to improve their protection. The results of studies may be used when developing the cultural criteria for the objects of underwater cultural heritage. Keywords: Legal protection, underwater cultural heritage, natural monuments, concept, world heritage, authenticity, archaeology, preservation, universal value, UNESCO.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Pimenova N.N. Kul'turnoe nasledie korennykh malochislennykh narodov Krasnoyarskogo kraya i sovremennye kul'turnye praktiki // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva. — 2014.-¹ 2.-S.28-66. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2014.2.11269. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/ca/article_11269.html
2. Filin, P.A. Morskoe nasledie kak vazhneishii faktor razvitiya morskoi deyatel'nosti Rossii // Pervaya Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Problemy izucheniya i sokhraneniya morskogo naslediya Rossii».-SPb.: Terra-Baltika. – 2010.-S. 107-117. 3. Bautista, Lowell. Ensuring the Preservation of Submerged Treasures for the Next Generation: The Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage in International Law / Lowell Bautista // Papers from the law of the Sea Institute, UC Berkeley-Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology Conference held in Seoul, Korea, May 2012 – 30 p. 4. Informatsionnyi komplekt UNESCO «Konventsiya UNESCO “Ob okhrane podvodnogo kul'turnogo naslediya” 2001 g.» // YuNESKO, 2006. – 30 S. 5. Guérin, Ulrike. Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania / Ulrike Guérin, Barbara Egger, Vidha Penalva de Almeida // UNESCO. 2010. – 111 r. 6. Boel, Niels. Twenty Thousand sites under The sea / Niels Boel // The UNESCO Courier. 2009.-¹1.-P. 14-15. 7. Doklad General'nogo Direktora o merakh, prinyatykh s tsel'yu izucheniya tselesoobraznosti razrabotki mezhdunarodnogo akta ob okhrane podvodnogo kul'turnogo naslediya. General'nayam Konferentsiya YuNESKO, 29 sessiya, Parizh, 1997. // YuNESKO, 1997. – 31 S. 8. Bass, Dzhordzh. Podvodnaya arkheologiya. Per s angl.-M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2003.-202 s. 9. Rezolyutsiya 29-i sessii General'noi Konferentsii YuNESKO, Parizh, 5 avgusta, 1997 g. // YuNESKO, 1997. – 31 S. 10. Rukovodstvo po vypolneniyu Konventsii ob okhrane Vsemirnogo naslediya. WHC.99/2. S.74 // Tsentr kul'turnogo naslediya, YuNESKO, mart 1999. – 74 S. 11. Konventsiya «Ob okhrane podvodnogo kul'turnogo naslediya» (Parizh, 2 noyabrya 2001 g.) // Normativnye akty YuNESKO po okhrane kul'turnogo naslediya. Yuni Print, M., 2002. 12. Konventsiya YuNESKO «Ob okhrane vsemirnogo kul'turnogo i prirodnogo naslediya» (Parizh, 16 noyabrya 1972 g.) // Normativnye akty YuNESKO po okhrane kul'turnogo naslediya. Yuni Print, M., 2002. 13. Klaus Shtal'maier. Bavarskii pivnoi zakon – mirovoe nasledie YuNESKO? // Istoricheskii zhurnal. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. 14. Tobi Smit. Kak Stena Adriana stala istochnikom protsvetaniya drevnikh brittov // Istoricheskii zhurnal. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. 15. Ivanov A.A.. Mariiskoe kraevedenie v 1920–1930-e gody: na puti k sokhraneniyu regional'nogo istoriko-dokumental'nogo naslediya // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2013.6.10587 16. Makovetskii E.A.. K voprosu o perspektivakh kontseptsii kul'turnogo naslediya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.12.3978 17. D. P. Shul'gina. Eklektika v rossiiskoi provintsii: faktor arkhitekturnogo naslediya pri vyyavlenii regional'nykh osobennostei // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. 18. Yu.I. Ivanova. Strakhovanie predmetov iskusstva kak instrument zashchity kul'turnogo naslediya strany // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.17 19. A.V. Sumachev. K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostei i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. 20. Yu.S. Zubenko. Arkheologicheskaya nakhodka kak spetsificheskii vid kul'turnoi tsennosti: problema pravovogo opredeleniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107 21. A.V. Sumachev K voprosu o ponyatii kul'turnykh tsennostei 22. i sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo 23. rezhima ikh okhrany // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 2074 - 2079. 24. Yu. A. Kazakova Pravovye problemy organizatsii mezhdunarodnogo 25. kul'turnogo sotrudnichestva 26. Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2011. - 3. - C. 111 - 119. 27. Koptseva N.P. Sovremennye kul'turnye praktiki sokhraneniya etnicheskoi identichnosti korennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka v Respublike Buryatiya // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva. - 2014. - 1. - C. 17 - 30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2014.1.10989. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10989.html 28. Yu.V. Spiridonova Genezis mezhdunarodnoi okhrany 29. kul'turnogo naslediya 30. v 1930-e gg. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 4. - C. 546 - 557. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.13. 31. Yu.S. Zubenko Arkheologicheskaya nakhodka 32. kak spetsificheskii vid 33. kul'turnoi tsennosti: 34. problema pravovogo opredeleniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 10. - C. 70 - 75. 35. M. F. Rumyantseva O kul'turnoi sostavlyayushchei 36. istoricheskogo znaniya // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2012. - 3. - C. 7 - 13. 37. Koptseva N.P. K voprosu o sokhranenii i vosproizvodstve traditsionnoi kul'tury korennykh malochislennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka v Sibirskom federal'nom okruge // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 12. - C. 1 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.12.10768. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10768.html 38. N. G. Abramova, O. S. Petrova Formirovanie istoricheskoi 39. geografii kak uchebnoi distsipliny. 40. Uchebnaya literatura po istoricheskoi 41. geografii // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 137 - 147. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2013.02.2. |