Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Vorobiev, V.A. Some issues regarding estimate terms in the international humanitarian law

Abstract: The issues regarding application of estimate terms in the Russian legal system were rather broadly discussed in the Russian legal doctrine. Good faith, reasonability, proportionality and other terms were studied both from the general theoretical and institutional standpoints, and more specifically, within the civil law framework. The Russian civil law scholars pointed out the complications regarding application of the legal norms containing these categories, evaluating the role of judicial discretion in resolving relevant issues. At the same time the modern international law literature did not provide comprehensive analysis, moreover, the English language literature lacks the long-standing legal term for the definition of what is referred to as “estimate term” in Russian. The specific features of the method of international law (method of coordination of sovereign expressions of will) do not necessarily stand for the absence of the relevant norms, and the tendencies for the formulation of obligations within the frame international treaties, or international treaties in general, require that this phenomenon is studied at the international law level. The modern international humanitarian law contains a large amount of the so-called “estimate terms”, which were formulated in early or mid-XX century. The article involves a brief overview of the practice and problems of their application with the due regard to the modern reality, which substantiates practical value of this study.


Keywords:

method of international law, international humanitarian law, humanity, reasonability, proportionality, estimate terms, Hague rules, Geneva rules, combatants, armed hostilities.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Yakunina, T.A. Printsipy sorazmernosti i gumannosti v mezhdunarodnom gumanitarnom prave // Printsipy prava: teoriya i praktika: sbornik tezisov dokladov (po materialam III mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii studentov i aspirantov, Saratov, 21 noyabrya 2011 g.).-Saratov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO “Sarat. gos. yur. akad.”, 2012.-S. 48-49.
2. Erik David. Printsipy prava vooruzhennykh konfliktov [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.icrc.org/rus/assets/files/other/4.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 13.05.2014).
3. Erik David. Printsipy prava vooruzhennykh konfliktov [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.icrc.org/rus/assets/files/other/4.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.05.2014).
4. Pretsedenty v mezhdunarodnom publichnom i chastnom prave / Blishchenko I.P., Doria Zh.; Red.: Arkhipova L.B..-2-e izd., dop.-M.: Izd-vo MNIMP, 1999. S. 323.
5. Razumov Yu.A. Nekotorye konstitutsionno-pravovoye osobennosti realizatsii norm mezhdunarodnogo prava v voennoy sfere v zarubezhnykh stranakh // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.171-183. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.684. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_684.html
6. Sifurova, L.A. Spravedlivost' v mezhdunarodnom prave // Aktual'nye mezhdunarodno-pravovye i gumanitarnye problemy. Sbornik statey.-M.: DA MID Rossii, 2001, Vyp. 2.-S. 55, 60, 62.
7. Sassoli M., Buv'e A. Pravovaya zashchita vo vremya voyny: pretsedenty, dokumenty i uchebnye materialy, otnosyashchiesya k sovremennoy praktike mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava: v 4 t. MKKK.-M.: raduga. 2008. T. 2. S. 433.
8. Ryasina, A.S. Otsenochnye kategorii v prave // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii.-Saratov: FGBOU VPO "Sarat. gos. yur. akad.", 2012, ¹ 2 (84).-S. 136.
9. Opalev, R.O. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsessual'nom prave [Elektronnyy resurs] : monografiya / R.O. Opalev.-M.: Volters Kluver, 2008. – Rezhim dostupa : komp'yuternaya set' Yurid. shkoly DVFU. – BD Konsul'tantPlyus.
10. Luk'yanenko, M.F. Otsenochnye ponyatiya grazhdanskogo prava: razumnost', dobrosovestnost', sushchestvennost' [Elektronnyy resurs] : monografiya / M.F. Luk'yanenko.-M.: Statut, 2010. – Rezhim dostupa : komp'yuternaya set' Yurid. shkoly DVFU. – BD Konsul'tantPlyus.
11. Izotov, D.M. O sootnoshenii krayney i voennoy neobkhodimosti v svete realizatsii printsipov Nyurnbergskogo tribunala // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii.-M.: Akad. Gen. prokuratury RF, 2011. ¹ 2 (22).-S. 80.
12. Dmitrieva, G.K. Printsip spravedlivosti v mezhdunarodnom prave // Sovetskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava, 1983.-M.: Nauka, 1984.-S. 75.
13. Zemskova, P.E. Printsip dobrosovestnosti i printsip spravedlivosti kak obshchie printsipy prava, priznannye tsivilizovannymi natsiyami [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://pravorggu.ru/2009_16/zemskova_12.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2014).
14. Dmitrieva, G.K. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.law.edu.ru/article/article.asp?articleID=187821 (data obrashcheniya: 16.05.2014).
15. Adel'khanyan, R. Kategorii “voennye prestupleniya” i “voennaya neobkhodimost'” // Zakonnost'.-M., 2003. ¹ 10.-S. 38.
16. Fedorchenko A.A. Pravo mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.87-103. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2014.1.11639. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_11639.html
17. Charl'z S. Mayer. Goroda pod pritselom: spory i umolchaniya o bombardirovkakh s vozdukha vo vremya Vtoroy mirovoy voyny [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.icrc.org/rus/assets/files/other/05_irrc_859_maier_rus.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 13.05.2014).
18. Babin B.V. Programmnoe regulirovanie v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave: teoreticheskie problemy i prakticheskiy opyt // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2012.-¹ 1.-S.36-75. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2012.1.373. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_373.html
19. Savryga K.P. Chastnye voennye i okhrannye kompanii po mezhdunarodnomu pravu // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2013. - 4. - C. 456 - 464. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10098.
20. E. Yu. Bondarenko Mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty voennogo plena
21. v mezhgosudarstvennykh i rossiyskikh normativno-
22. pravovykh aktakh kontsa XIX – XX vv. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2012. - 2. - C. 155 - 171.