Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Gilfanov, A.R. Defi nition of proof and its goal in criminal procedural activities of border guard bodies

Abstract: The article is devoted to the specific features of proof in pre-trial proceedings on criminal cases concerning unlawful passing of the state border of the Russian Federation. The author discusses a number of topical practical issues, regarding the elements of crime. He substantiates the statements that the goal of proof in the pre-trial proceedings on criminal cases within this category is formation of the final document of the preliminary investigation, which should be sufficient for the further judicial proceedings on a case. The author provides his own definition of the term “proof in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case”. The operative investigation practice of the procedural divisions of the border guard bodies proves that the criminal cases initiated due to elements of unlawful crossing of the state border of the Russian Federation (Art. 322 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) form over 50% of all of the criminal cases investigated by the border guard bodies. The proof in pre-trial proceedings on a criminal case is the cognitive process implemented equally by the participants of the judicial proceedings on the sides of defense and accusation, including collection of factual information necessary for the correct resolution of a criminal case, their examination and study for the purpose of making a final decision of a preliminary procedural stage, which is sufficient for the further judicial proceedings on a criminal case.


Keywords:

state border of the Russian Federation, due unlawful passing, goal of proof, pre-trial proceedings, terrorist organizations, extremist activities, international contractual registration, migration processes, economic zones, continental shelf.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Yanchurkin O.V., Kamchatov K.V., Zhuravleva A.S. Prokurorskii nadzor za protsessual'noi deyatel'nost'yu organov doznaniya i predvaritel'nogo sledstviya po ugolovnym delam v sfere torgovli lyud'mi // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 11. - C. 64 - 77. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.9839. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9839.html
2. Olimpiev A.Yu. O sub''ektakh predvaritel'nogo
3. sledstviya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2011. - 6. - C. 39 - 41.
4. O. G. Ivanova Ponyatie i vidy
5. ugolovno-protsessual'nykh proizvodstv // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 7. - C. 30 - 38.
6. Shemetov M.N.. Problemy realizatsii mer ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za kontrabandu. // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107
7. S. N. Tikhonova. Pravovoi analiz sovremennogo sostoyaniya mezhdunarodno-pravovogo oformleniya gosudarstvennoi granitsy Rossiiskoi Federatsii. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2010. – ¹ 9.
8. V. M. Bondarenko. Nekotorye aspekty okhrany Gosudarstvennoi granitsy Rossiiskoi Federatsii kak usloviya obespecheniya natsional'noi bezopasnosti. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2010. – ¹ 9.
9. Narutto S.V.. K voprosu ob izmenenii gosudarstvennoi granitsy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
10. A. A. Molchanov. K voprosu o rasshiritel'nom tolkovanii norm ob administrativnoi otvetstvennosti za narushenie tamozhennykh pravil // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – ¹ 5.
11. A.R. Gil'fanov. O nekotorykh problemakh pravoprimenitel'noi deyatel'nosti podrazdelenii doznaniya pogranichnykh organov FSB Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.11
12. Narutto S.V. K voprosu ob izmenenii gosudarstvennoi granitsy // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 12.-S.35-50. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.12.10698. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/al/article_10698.html
13. Terekhov M.Yu.. Obespechenie organami predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya okhranyaemoi federal'nym zakonom tainy vo vzaimodeistvii so sredstvami massovoi informatsii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
14. Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M., 1971.
15. Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.62-76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
16. Savitskii V.M. Gosudarstvennoe obvinenie v sude. M., 1971
17. Ratinov A.R. Voprosy poznaniya v sudebnom dokazyvanii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. M., 1964. ¹ 8. – S. – 107.
18. Birmamitova S.A. Dokazyvanie na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa po delam o prestupleniyakh, sovershennykh osuzhdennymi v ispravitel'nykh koloniyakh. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007.
19. Abdulvaliev A.F. Predposylki i perspektivy vnedreniya elektronnoi formy ugolovnogo dela v deyatel'nost' sudebnykh organov // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 5. - C. 150 - 164. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.345. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_345.html
20. Khaliullin A.I. Vnedrenie elektronnogo dokumentooborota v deyatel'nost' pravookhranitel'nykh organov gosudarstv Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv // NB: Kibernetika i programmirovanie. - 2013. - 6. - C. 12 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4196.2013.6.10279. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/kp/article_10279.html