Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Kostenko, N.I. The concept of formation of the international criminal penal (penitentiary) law

Abstract: The article concerns the problems of implementation of the international standards in the sphere of international criminal justice, which may form the basis for the concept of formation of the international criminal penal (penitentiary) law. The object of studies includes the system of relations, providing for the formation of a new branch of international law - international criminal penal (penitentiary) law. The immediate object of studies is the combination of international norms, regulating the treatment of convicts, conditions and guarantees of their rights, as well as implementation of the punishments based upon the decisions of the International Criminal Court. The methodological basis for the study is formed with the dialectic method of cognition with the use of principles of development, integrity and systemic character. The work involved general scientific and special legal methods: comparative, systemic-structural, theoretical-methodological, etc. It should also be stated that there were prior studies in Russian and foreign international law in this sphere, however, there were no sufficient in-depth studies. At the same time the issue of the concept of formation of the international criminal penal (penitentiary) law is important in both theoretical and practical dimensions from the moment when the International Criminal Court was founded. Specific features of implementation of international standards in the sphere of international criminal justice and implementation of criminal punishments, as it is stated in the Statute of the International Criminal Court presupposes their top priority both in the scientific field and in the sphere of practice of modern international law in order to guarantee formation and development of the new branch of law - international criminal penal (penitentiary) law.

Keywords:

Penitentiary law, criminal justice, international standards, concept, rights of convicts, penitentiary sentence, penitentiary rules, justice, minimal standards, international cooperation.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. G. G. Shinkaretskaya. Mezhdunarodnoe pravoi mirnoe uregulirovanie // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
2. G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Zapret zloupotrebleniya mezhdunarodnoi sudebnoi protseduroi kak faktor obespecheniya sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 2.G. G. Shinkaretskaya. Novye deistvuyushchie litsa v mezhdunarodnom prave. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – ¹ 1.
3. G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Iz''yatie iz kompetentsii sudebnykh uchrezhdenii del, otnosyashchikhsya k vnutrennei kompetentsii gosudarstva // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 3.
4. R.A. Kalamkaryan, Yu.I. Migachev. Vseobshchaya Deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: rol' i znachenie v usloviyakh miroporyadka na osnove gospodstva prava Rule of Law. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
5. R. A. Kalamkaryan. Mezhdunarodnyi sud OON kak administrativno-pravovoi organ mirovogo soobshchestva po mirnomu razresheniyu mezhdunarodnykh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – ¹ 2.
6. R. A. Kalamkaryan. Kodifikatsiya i progressivnoe razvitie mezhdunarodnogo prava kak formy administrativno-pravovoi deyatel'nosti mirovogo soobshchestva po sovershenstvovaniyu mezhdunarodnogo prava. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
7. Babushkin A., Lekomtsev V. Angliiskaya tyur'ma glazami Rossii// Prestuplenie i nakazanie. 1996. ¹
8. S. 32-39. 2. Biryukov P.N. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: Uchebnoe posobie. M., Yurist'', 1999,-416 s.
9. Blishchenko I.P., Fisenko I.V. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud. M., YuNITI, 1998.-239 s.
10. Valeev R.M. Vydacha prestupnikov v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. Nekotorye voprosy teorii i praktiki. Kazan', izd. Kazanskogo universiteta, 1976.-57 s.
11. Doklad o zayavke Rossii na vstuplenie v Sovet Evropy. Zaklyuchenie po dokladu o zayavke Rossii na vstuplenie v Sovet Evropy. M., 1997. S. 4.
12. Kommentarii k Ugolovno-ispolnitel'nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federa-tsii /Pod red. A.I. Zubkova. M., 1997. 408 s.
13. Kostenko N.I. Mezhdunarodnaya ugolovnaya yustitsiya. Problemy razvitiya. M., 2002. Izd.-vo RKonsul't, 448 s.
14. Kostenko N.I. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo: sovremennye teoreticheskie problemy. M.: Izd.-vo «Yurlitiform», 2004. S. 50.
15. Lukashuk I. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo v sudakh gosudarstv. SPb., SKF «Rossiya-Neva», 1993.-302 s.
16. Lukashuk I. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: Osobennaya chast'.-M., BEK, 2001.-456 s.
17. Lukashuk I. I., Naumov A. V. Vydacha obvinyaemykh i osuzhdennykh v mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom prave. – M., RYuID, 1998.-160 s.
18. Lukashuk I. I., A. V. Naumov A.V. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo. M., Spark, 1999.-287 s.
19. Lukashuk I. I. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M., Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1975.-175 s.
20. Martens F. F. Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo tsivilizovannykh narodov. T. 1 (po izdaniyu 1904 g.) M., Izd-vo «Yuridicheskii kolledzh MGU». 1996.-313 s.; T. 2 (po izdaniyu 1905 g.) M., Izd-vo «Yuridicheskii kolledzh MGU». 1996.-369 s.
21. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: Uchebnik. Izd. 2-e, dop. i pererab. Otv. Red. Yu. M. Kolosov, V. I. Kuznetsov. M., Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 1998.-624 s.
22. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo. Uchebnik. Pod red. K. A. Bekyasheva. M., «Prospekt», 1999.-640 s.
23. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: Uchebnik. Otv. red. Yu. M. Kolosov, E.S. Krivchikova. M., Mezhd. otnosh., 2000.-720 s.
24. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Otv. red. G. V. Ignatenko i O. I. Tiunov. M., Izdatel'skaya gruppa NORMA – INFRA ∙ M, 1999.-584 s.
25. Modzhoryan L. A. Sub''ekty mezhdunarodno-pravovoi otvetstvennosti //Sov. gos. i pravo. 1969. ¹ 12. S. 123-132.
26. Safferling K. Na puti k Mezhdunarodnoi ugolovnoi protsedure. N'yu-Iork, 2001.-198 s.
27. Ushakov N. A. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Uchebnik. M., Yurist''. 2000. 304 s.
28. Chernichenko S. V. Opredelenie massovykh i grubykh narushenii prav cheloveka, kak mezhdunarodnogo prestupleniya //Dok. OON. E/CN. 4/Sub. 10/ 1997/2. P. 9.
29. Chernichenko S. V. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. V 2-kh tomakh. Tom. 1: Sovremennye teoreticheskie problemy.-M., Izdatel'stvo «NIMP», 1999.-336 s. Tom 2: Starye i novye teoreticheskie problemy.-M., Izdatel'stvo «NIMP», 1999. 531 s.
30. Shumikhin V. G., Rozhkov S. A. Reforma ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo zakonodatel'stva v usloviyakh perekhoda k rynochnoi ekonomike // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1992. ¹ 7. S. 54-59.
31. Kalamkaryan R.A.. Mezhdunarodnyi sud kak glavnyi sudebnyi organ Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.7737.
32. R.A. Kalamkaryan. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.6.
33. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
34. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
35. Ushakov S.V. Problema prinuditel'nogo ispolneniya reshenii Mezhdunarodnogo Suda Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii i pravo OON//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations, ¹1-2010
36. Bail'dinov E. T. Vozmozhnosti Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii obespecheniya realizatsii norm mezhdunarodnogo prava//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations, ¹2-2011
37. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeiskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiiskoi Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.html
38. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnoe grazhdansko-protsessual'noe pravo: ponyatie, predmet i sistema // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.16-160. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.4.10362. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_10362.html
39. Solov'eva T.V. Ob otsutstvii edinogo normativno zakreplennogo poryadka privedeniya v ispolnenie postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.184-200. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.4.2507. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2507.htm
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.