Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Shihanov, V.N. Legal construction of negligent crimes needs improving

Abstract: Criminal law is regarded as one of the strongest means against negative social manifestations. In Russia it is easily amended. At the same time, the criminal statistical data in the last 40 years make one doubt its capability of positive influence upon the situation in the sphere of negligent crimes. The main causes for the protective and regulatory malfunction of the criminal law are shortcomings of the legal construction, which serves as the basis for the most articles in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on negligent crimes. The use of structural-functional approach and some linguistic methods allow to uncover the main defects of the legal construction of negligent crimes, as well as negative matters in judicial and investigative practice due to its application. The current provisions of criminal law allow to substantiate for the legal responsibility in various situations of negligent causation of harm, however, it fails to give due regard to the important features of social and individual conscience of the addressees. The semantic focus of the criminal legal prohibition was moved away from the voluntary activity units and social psychological settings, which need to be pressed out of the social practice. It leads to application of criminal law through the rules of the strict liability and lowering of its general preventive potential, as well as to the number of other undesirable consequences. In the final part of the article the author formulates six propositions for the improvement of legal construction, allowing to make criminal law more efficient for the purpose of protection of social relation from negligent violations.

Keywords:

Criminal responsibility, differentiation of responsibility, legal constructions, negligence, protective functions, criminal law, legal technique, negligent crime, causal link, strict liability.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii i simvoly v ugolovnom prave/ L. L. Kruglikov, O. E. Spiridonova. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2005. – 336 s
2. Yu.V. Kozubenko Issledovanie mekhanizma ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya na mezhotraslevom urovne // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON).-2013.-6.-C. 655-661.
3. A.I. Komarov, T.V. Yarovenko. Nekotorye problemy proverki versii prichineniya smerti iz ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya po neostorozhnosti // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – ¹ 7.
4. Cherdantsev, A. F. Logiko-yazykovye fenomeny v prave, yuridicheskoy nauke i praktike/ A. F. Cherdantsev. – Ekaterinburg, 1993. – 192 s.
5. Sitnikova, A. I. Zakonodatel'naya tekstologiya ugolovnogo prava: monografiya/ A. I. Sitnikova. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2011. – 344 s.
6. Problemy prichiny i prichinnoy svyazi v institutakh Obshchey i Osobennoy chastey ugolovnogo prava: voprosy teorii, operativno-sledstvennoy i sudebnoy praktiki/ I. Ya. Kozachenko, V. N. Kurchenko, Ya. M. Zlochenko. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. – 791 s.
7. Pan'ko K.K. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii kak kategorii vnutrenney formy (struktury) ugolovnogo prava// Pravo i politika. – 2005. – ¹ 3. – S. 19 – 28
8. Naumov, A. V. Forma ugolovnogo zakona i ee sotsial'naya obuslovlennost'/ A. V. Naumov, IGPAN // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva. – M., 1984. – S. 18 – 27
9. Luneev, V. V. Prestupnost' XX veka: mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendentsii/ V. V. Luneev. – Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2005. – 912 s.
10. Lopashenko, N. A. Ugolovnaya politika/ N. A. Lopashenko. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2009. – 608 s.
11. Kristi, N. Predely nakazaniya / N. Kristi, per. s angl. V.M. Kogana, pod. red. Z.I. Lukovnikova. – M.: Progress, 1985. – 198 s.
12. Zhalinskiy, A. E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy analiz/ A. E. Zhalinskiy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Prospekt, 2009. – 400 s.
13. Esakov, G. A. Mens rea v ugolovnom prave SShA: istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie/ G. A. Esakov, predisl. O.F. Shishova. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2003. – 553 s.
14. Dorozhno-transportnaya prestupnost': zakonomernosti, prichiny, sotsial'nyy kontrol'/ A.Yu. Kravtsov, A.I. Sirokhin, R.V. Skomorokhov, V.N. Shikhanov, pod red. V.V. Luneeva. – SPb.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2011. – 474 s.
15. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave/ L. L. Kruglikov, A. V. Vasil'evskiy. – SPb.: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2003. – 298 s.
16. Gilinskiy, Ya. I. Kriminologiya: teoriya, istoriya, empiricheskaya baza, sotsial'nyy kontrol'/ Ya. I. Gilinskiy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2009. – 504 s.
17. Alekseev, S. S. Voskhozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i resheniya/ S. S. Alekseev. – M.: NORMA, 2001. – 752 s.
18. Antonov, A.D. Teoreticheskie osnovy kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii : Dis… kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.08 / A. D. Antonov. – M.: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 2001. – 182 s.
19. M.F. Luk'yanenko. «Dobrosovestnost'»: zakon i praktika primeneniya. Chast' vtoraya. Okonchanie // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – ¹ 7.
20. M. F. Luk'yanenko. «Dobrosovestnost'»: zakon i praktika primeneniya. Chast' 1 // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – ¹ 6.
21. V.A. Kalinovskiy, A.I. Komarov. Proverka versii obvinyaemoy o prichinenii smerti po neostorozhnosti. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹ 8.
22. Aliev Nazim Kazim ogly. Nekotorye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya norm o ponyatii i priznakakh souchastiya v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve Azerbaydzhana // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.8.
23. Pan'shin D.L.. Nekotorye aktual'nye voprosy primeneniya lisheniya prava upravleniya transportnymi sredstvami za administrativnye pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.10.9112.
24. Bashirova A.F., Istratov A.A.. Pravovoe regulirovanie profilaktiki dorozhno-transportnogo travmatizma // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107.
25. Moskvina Yu.V.. O prichinenii material'nogo ushcherba v rezul'tate dorozhno-transportnogo proisshestviya kak obstoyatel'stve, otyagchayushchem administrativnuyu otvetstvennost' // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2011. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107.
26. Boreyko Yu.A.. Formirovanie sistemy ucheta administrativnykh pravonarusheniy v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107.
27. Ayvar L.K., Trunov I.L.. Narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan pri dorozhno-transportnykh proisshestviyakh. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2010. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107.
28. Esaulov S.V.. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy printsipa prezumptsii nevinovnosti v ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti politsii. // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107
29. Akopdzhanova M.O. O roli ugolovno-pravovoy nauki v zakonotvorcheskom protsesse // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 76 - 81. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9217.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.