|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Dobrynin, N.M.
On the anniversary of the Constitution: an essay on problems
of interaction and interdependence of the Constitution
of the Russian Federation and constitutionalism:
nature, reality, specifi c features and the myth
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 13.
P. 1866-1881.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52124
Dobrynin, N.M. On the anniversary of the Constitution: an essay on problems
of interaction and interdependence of the Constitution
of the Russian Federation and constitutionalism:
nature, reality, specifi c features and the myth
Abstract:
The object of study in this article concerns the problems of interaction and interdependence of the Constitution of the Russian
Federation and constitutionalism: its nature and specific features, principles and factors, as well as the perspectives for the constitutional
target-setting in the light of an inevitable constitutional reform. The author provides detailed and comprehensive analysis of the definition
of constitutionalism, and in-depth analysis of the evolution and the current period of its development within the framework of the
Russian state. Based on many years of his research and studies, analysis of works of legal scholars, comparative analysis of norms and
principles of the Constitution with political, economic, social and cultural reality, the author makes a conclusion on substantial inner
contradictions in the Russian constitutionalism, especially pointing out its insufficiency and lack of due interrelation with the Basic
Law of the State. The study involved the methods of classification, analysis, synthesis, comparative legal method, empirical method, and
historic method. The article has elements of scientific novelty, including the author’s own definition of constitutionalism, its key elements
and conditions for the existence of the Russian constitutionalism, interrelation and interdependency of Constitution and constitutionalism
in defining the vector for the constitutional target-setting in Russia and the key prerequisites for the urgent constitutional reform.
Keywords:
interdependence, democracy, constitutional reform, constitutional crisis, constitution, legal culture, social systems, administration, functions of the constitution, target-setting.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Yanov A. Montesk'e protiv Marksa // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 1992. – ¹ 1;
2. Chirkin V.E. Reforma rossiyskoy Konstitutsii: etapy i problemy // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2000. – ¹ 5;
3. Chirkin V.E. Konstitutsionalizm i sovremennaya tsivilizatsiya // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. – 2006. – ¹ 3 (Konstitutsionnyy stroy Rossii. Vyp. 5). – M., 2006;
4. Topornin B.N. Konstitutsionnaya reforma – put' k pravovomu gosudarstvu // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1990. – ¹ 4;
5. Stepanov I.M. Uroki i paradoksy rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma. – M., 1996; 27. Tarasenko F.P. Prikladnoy sistemnyy analiz. – M.: KNORUS, 2010;
6. Stepanov I.M. Grani rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma (KhKh vek) // Konstitutsionnyy stroy Rossii. Vyp. 1. – M., 1992;
7. Reysner M.A. Gosudarstvo burzhuazii i RSFSR. – M.-Pg: Gosizdat, 1923;
8. Medushevskiy A.N. Chto takoe mnimyy konstitutsionalizm? // So-tsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 1994. – ¹ 2;
9. Medushevskiy A.N. Konstitutsionnaya monarkhiya v Evrope, Yaponii i Rossii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 1994. – ¹ 6;
10. Luchin V.O. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Problemy realizatsii. – M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2002;
11. Leontovich V.V. Istoriya liberalizma v Rossii. 1762–1914. – M.: Russkiy put', 1995;
12. Kravets I.A. Formirovanie rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma (problemy teorii i praktiki). – M.-Novosibirsk: OOO «Izdatel'stvo YuKEA», 2002;
13. Kravets I.A. Konstitutsionalizm: ustoychivost' vlasti i obshche-stvennogo razvitiya. – Novosibirsk: Izd-e IFiPr SO RAN, 1994;
14. Kravets I.A. Konstitutsionalizm i rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost' v nachale KhKh veka: Ucheb. posobie. – M.: IVTs «Marketing»; Novosibirsk: OOO «Izdatel'stvo YuKEA», 2000;
15. Kon'kov N. Rossiya – superoligarkhiya [Elektronnyy resurs] / Agentstvo politicheskikh novostey [sayt]. — URL: http://www.apn.ru/opinions/article9378.htm (data obrashcheniya 1.11.2013);
16. Kerimov A.D. Sovremennoe gosudarstvo: voprosy teorii. – M.: Norma, 2007;
17. Egorov S.A. Konstitutsionalizm v SShA: politiko-pravovye as-pekty. – M.: Nauka, 1993;
18. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. Fragmentarnyy konstitutsionalizm // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. – 2006. – ¹ 3 (Konstitutsionnyy stroy Rossii. Vyp. 5). – M., 2006;
19. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. Teoriya i praktika federalizma: sistem-nyy podkhod. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2009;
20. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. Verifikatsiya definitsiy konstitutsionnoy nauki vs. uvlechenie obshchimi mestami // Politika i obshchestvo. – 2009. – ¹ 5;
21. Bogdanova N.A. Sistema nauki konstitutsionnogo prava. – M.: Yurist', 2001;
22. Bogdanova N.A. Kategoriya «konstitutsionalizm» v nauke konstitu-tsionnogo prava // Rossiyskiy konstitutsionalizm: problemy i resheniya. – M., 1999;
23. Bobrova N.A. Konstitutsionnyy stroy i konstitutsionalizm v Ros-sii. – M.: YuNITI-DANA, Zakon i pravo, 2003;
24. Avak'yan S.A. Tochka otscheta – narod // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2006. – 28 okt.;
25. Avak'yan S.A. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: norma i deystvitel'nost' // Neprikosnovennyy zapas. – 2008. – ¹ 5 (61);
26. Avak'yan S.A. Konstitutsiya Rossii: priroda, evolyutsiya, sovremen-nost'. – M.: RYuID, 1997;
27. Avak'yan S.A. Desyat' prichin dlya konstitutsionnykh reform v Ros-sii // Nezavisimaya gazeta. – 2012. – 16 okt.;
28. Sibert M. Traite de droit international public. – T. I. – P., 1951.
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
