Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Sazonova, K.L.
On the issue of correlation of international crimes
of a state, jus cogens norms, and erga omnes obligations
in the modern international law
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 9.
P. 1175-1181.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52041
Sazonova, K.L. On the issue of correlation of international crimes of a state, jus cogens norms, and erga omnes obligations in the modern international lawAbstract: A bit more than 40 years ago three international legal concepts became subjects of discussion: the concept of international crimes committed by states, the concept of jus cogens norms and the concept of erga omnes obligations, which were aimed to bring the international community to the new level of interaction and consolidation. However, the positive consequences of the conceptual provisions of these concepts are not obvious, especially concerning their practical implementation. The international scientific community fails to resolve the problems of specific contents of these concepts, their correlation, in spite of the fact that they touch upon the fundamental issues of modern international interactions. That is why, it is important to analyze these three concepts, which have much in common, being rather different from each other, and to evaluate the positions of legal scholars in the sphere of international law on these concepts. The author considers that the key aspect, connecting the concept of international crimes committed by states, the concept of jus cogens norms and the concept of erga omnes obligations, is that all of these concepts presuppose a quality difference in consolidation and coordination of international community up to the development of the supranational level of government. Keywords: the ICJ, international community, erga omnes obligations, jus cogens norms, international crimes committed by states, international law, the ILO, use of force, genocide, apartheid.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Lukashuk I.I. Kontseptsiya prava mezhdunarodnoy otvetstvennosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. M., 2003. ¹4. C. 79-84.
2. Abi-Saab G. The Uses of Article 19//European Journal of International Law. 1999. vol 10, no.2. pp. 339-351. 3. Crawford J. First report on State Responsibility. International Law Comission. 1998. A/CCN.4/490/Add.2. 4. Crawford J. Second Report on State Responsibility. International Law Comission 1999. A/CN.4/498. 5. Gaja G. Obligations Erga Omnes, International Crimes and Jus Cogens: A Tentative Analysis of Three Related Concepts. In International Crimes of State. Weiler J. H. H., Cassese A., Spinedi M. (eds.) 1989. 368 p. 6. Jorgensen N.H.B. The Responsibility of States for International Crimes. Oxford, 2000. (reprinted 2005). 331 p. 7. Koskenniemi M., Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch//European Journal of International Law. 1997. Vol. 8. pp. 566-582. 8. Pellet A. Can a State Commit a Crime? Definitely, Yes!// European Journal of International Law. 1999. Vol. 10. No. 2 pp. 425–434. 9. Ragazzi M. The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 1997. (reprinted in 2002). 264 p. 10. Simma B. Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner//The European Journal of International Law. 2009. Vol. 20 no. 2. pp. 265-297. 11. Tomuschat S., Reconceptualizing the Debate on Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes—Concluding Observations. In The Fundamental Rules of International Legal Order. Tomuschat C., Thouvenin J.-M. (eds.), 2006. P. 471. 12. Vaurs-Chaumette A.-L. Peoples and Minorities. In The Law of International Responsibility, ed. J. Crawford, A. Pellet and S. Olleson, Oxford University Press, 2010. 1296 p. 13. Vaurs-Chaumette A.-L. The International Community as a Whole. In The Law of International Responsibility. J. Crawford, A. Pellet and S. Olleson (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2010.1296 p |