|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Nafikova, G.A.
Specific features of interrogation of witnesses and victims
in court in the conditions excluding visual observation.
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 7.
P. 907-914.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52009
Nafikova, G.A. Specific features of interrogation of witnesses and victims in court in the conditions excluding visual observation.Abstract: The general guarantees of criminal process provide for the complex of conditions, facilitating the comprehensive and objective procedure on criminal cases. The further development of the guarantees may be found in the measures regarding support of rights and freedoms of person and citizen in the criminal judicial procedure. The problem of implementation of the principle of protection of rights of persons and citizens is related to the guarantees of subjective rights and lawful interests of an individual. One of the key guarantees for the witness and victim on criminal case is a guarantee of security throughout the process on criminal case, including the judicial stages. This security guarantee should include protection and psychological support. Keywords: jurisprudence, witness, victim, interrogation, security, visual, observation, choleric, melancholic, sanguine, phlegmatic.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Khalikov A.Obespechenie bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v stadii sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2008. – ¹ 4. – S. 17.
2. Stetsovskiy Yu.I. Sudebnaya vlast'. – M.: Delo, 2000. – S. 149. 3. Brusnitsyn L.V. Poterpevshie i svideteli pod psevdonimom: natsional'noe zakonodatel'stvo i pretsedenty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2002. – ¹ 2. – S. 125–127. 4. Belyaev M.V. Rassledovanie i sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo del o banditizme: ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie voprosy. – Kazan': Kazan. gos. un-t, 2009. – S. 140; 5. Sidorova N.V. Pokazaniya svidetelya v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: Ucheb. posobie. – Tyumen': Izd-vo Tyumen. gos. un-ta, 2007. – S. 91. 6. Ugolovnoe delo ¹ 2-5/2006 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Tatarstan za 2006 g. 7. Belyaev M.V. Ukaz. soch. – S. 140–141. 8. Novikova M.V. Institut bezopasnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve i puti ego sovershenstvovaniya // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2007. – ¹ 7. – S. 38–41. 9. Yakimov I.N., Mikheev P.P. Dopros. – M., 1930 g. – S. 29 10. Zorin G.A. Rukovodstvo po taktike doprosa. – M., 2001. – S. 235 11. Koni A.F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. – M., 1965. – S. 160. 12. Vasil'ev V.L. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. – SPb.: Piter, 2009. – S. 557. 13. Ugolovnoe delo ¹ 119344 // Arkhiv Prokuratury Respubliki Tatarstan za 1999 g. 14. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M., 1991. – S. 24–25. 15. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 8 iyulya 2004 g. ¹ 32-O04-37sp // BVS RF. – 2005. – ¹ 8. – S. 21–22. 16. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 iyunya 2006 g. ¹ 43-O06-9 // Pravovaya sistema «Garant». 17. Brusnitsyn L. Psevdonimy v ugolovnom protsesse // Zakonnost'. – 2005. – ¹ 1. 18. Epikhin A. Pravovoe regulirovanie mer bezopasnosti uchastnikov protsessa // Zakonnost'. – 2003. – ¹ 5. – S. 47. 19. Malov A.A., Timoshenko A.A. Sostoyanie zakonnosti i problemnye aspekty primeneniya mer gosudarstvennoy zashchity k poterpevshim, svidetelyam i inym uchastnikam ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M.: Gen. prokuratura RF, 2008. – S. 17. 20. Spravka Upravleniya po obespecheniyu uchastiya prokurorov v rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del sudami General'noy prokuratury RF o primenenii norm UPK RF, obespechivayushchikh bezopasnost' uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 24 dekabrya 2003 g. iskh. ¹ 12/12-03 // Arkhiv NII problem ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka pri General'noy prokurature RF. 21. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2005 g. ¹ 24-D04-9 // BVS RF. – 2006. – ¹ 6. – S. 29. 22. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 iyunya 2006 g. ¹ 43-O06-9 // Pravovaya sistema «Garant». 23. Opredelenie SK po ugolovnym delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2005 g. ¹ 24-D04-9 «Kazhdyy obvinyaemyy v sovershenii ugolovnogo prestupleniya soglasno p. 16 ch. 4 st. 47, st. 247, ch. 3 st. 278 UPK RF vprave doprashivat' pokazyvayushchikh protiv nego svideteley» (izvlechenie) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2006. – ¹ 6. 24. Brusnitsyn L.V. Kommentariy zakonodatel'stva ob obespechenii bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M.: Yustitsinform, 2009. – S. 178. 25. Tomin V.T. Ostrye ugly ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva.-M., 1991.-S. 24-25 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
