|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Kolesnikova, Yu. A.
Recovery of Living Quarters from a ‘Bona Fide Purchaser’
from the Point of View of the Law Supremacy
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 6.
P. 832-835.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52000
Kolesnikova, Yu. A. Recovery of Living Quarters from a ‘Bona Fide Purchaser’ from the Point of View of the Law SupremacyAbstract: The present article is devoted to searching the legal solution of the problem when there is a conß ict of a claim of the owner who does not have living quarters and a claim of a bona fide purchaser who owns these living quarters, from the point of view of the law supremacy principle. Legal regulation of the questions of recovery of living quarters from a bona fide purchaser must comply with the three elements of the law supremacy principle: requirement of legal certainty, requirement of legal efficiency and requirement of observing the balance of interests. The research shows that the process of vindication of living quarters from a bona fide purchaser does not comply with the aforesaid requirements. Thus, there is a need in formulating the assessment criteria for withdrawal of living quarters from possession. The author also offers a new method of protecting violated rights of a ‘bona fide purchaser’ and non-owner. In order to apply the law supremacy principle in vindication, the author makes certain suggestions on what changes are needed to be made in civil and housing legislation as well as amendments to Article 302 of the Civil Cod of the Russian Federation. Keywords: Law studies, recovery, vindication, living, quarter, owner, supremacy, property, bona fide, purchaser.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. V.V. Ershov. Pravosudie, pravoponimanie i pravotvorchestvo v usloviyakh globalizatsii s pozitsii legizma i «shirokogo» ponimaniya prava // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. ¹ 12 (68), 2011. S. 15-16.
2. M.V. Presnyakov. Pravovaya opredelennost' kak sistemnoe kachestvo rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2009, N 5. 3. Neshataeva T.N. Uroki sudebnoy praktiki o pravakh cheloveka: evropeyskiy i rossiyskiy opyt. M.: Gorodets, 2007. 4. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 N 51-FZ (red. ot 30.11.2011) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 05.12.1994, N 32, st. 3301. 5. Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 06.12.2011 g. Po delu «Gladysheva protiv Rossii» (zhaloba ¹ 7097/10). 6. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 27 noyabrya 2008 g. N 11-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti vtoroy stat'i 5 Federal'nogo zakona «O minimal'nom razmere oplaty truda» v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan A.F. Kutinoy i A.F. Povarnitsinoy» // SZ RF. 2008. N 51. St. 6205. 7. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 15 iyulya 1999 g. N 11-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozheniy Zakona RSFSR «O Gosudarstvennoy nalogovoy sluzhbe RSFSR» i Zakonov Rossiyskoy Federatsii «Ob osnovakh nalogovoy sistemy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» i «O federal'nykh organakh nalogovoy politsii» // SZ RF. 1999. N 30. St. 3988. 8. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF N 10, Plenuma VAS RF N 22 ot 29.04.2010 g. «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh v sudebnoy praktike pri razreshenii sporov, svyazannykh s zashchitoy prava sobstvennosti i drugikh veshchnykh prav» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF, N 7, iyul', 2010 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
