Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Alekberova, N. N.
The Problems of Legal Qualification of Stimulated
and Fraudulent Deals in Civil Law
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 6.
P. 825-831.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51999
Alekberova, N. N. The Problems of Legal Qualification of Stimulated and Fraudulent Deals in Civil LawAbstract: The article studies and analyzes the main problems related to stimulated and fraudulent deals. In particular, it discusses the procedure for acknowledging certain deals as stimulated or fraudulent, a number of parties who can apply for a deal to be acknowledged as invalid based on its stimulated or fraudulent nature as well as the action limitation for stimulated and fraudulent deals. It is stated that the circumstances proving the nullity of stimulated or fraudulent deals should be viewed and confirmed by judicial process. At the present time, the tax authorities’ right to add taxes by non-judicial means can be considered to be a direct infringement of a taxpayer’s right and tax authorities can take an advantage of it by considering certain deals to be stimulated or fraudulent. Moreover, it is suggested that the action limitation period should start on the day when a claimant learns or is supposed to learn about arising of certain circumstances that create grounds for considering deals to be void. Keywords: Fraudulent deal, stimulated deal, contestability of a deal, void deal, legal process, action limitation, concerned parties, application of consequences, legal qualification, public law.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Vinnitskiy D.V. Problemy razgranicheniya nalogovogo planirovaniya i deystviy, napravlennykh na uklonenie ot nalogooblozheniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. ¹ 11. S. 4.
2. Grimm D.D. Lektsii po dogme rimskogo prava. M. 2003. S.137. 3. Kornaukhov M.V. Metodologiya sporov ob obosnovannosti nalogovoy vygody // Nalogi. 2008. ¹ 1. S.3. 4. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF i Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 01 iyulya 1996 g. ¹ 6/8 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul'tantPlyus». 5. Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda ot 10 aprelya 2008 g. ¹ 22 «O nekotorykh voprosakh praktiki rassmotreniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem stat'i 169 Grazhdanskogo Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul'tantPlyus». 6. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 08 aprelya 2010 g. ¹ 456-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhalob zakrytogo aktsionernogo obshchestva «Vikon» i grazhdanki Lokhovoy Alevtiny Pavlovny na narushenie Konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod punktom 1 stat'i 181 Grazhdanskogo Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Fedkratsii» // Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul'tantPlyus» |