|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Ratushnaya B. P.
The Problems of Motivation of Judicial Decisions in the
Ukraine
// Law and Politics.
2013. ¹ 6.
P. 798-802.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51994
Ratushnaya B. P. The Problems of Motivation of Judicial Decisions in the UkraineAbstract: The article studies theoretical and legislative problems of motivation of judicial decisions in the Ukraine. Based on the analysis of the Ukrainian procedural legislation, theoretical researches on the matter and case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the author proves that motivation of judicial decisions along with their legality and justification is one of the important requirements for the quality of judicial decisions. Observation of this requirement shows that the judicial procedure in general and the process of determination of actual circumstances of a case are just and fair. It has also been established that motivation of a judicial act also relates to description of motives as a result of thinking activity based on which the court has made certain decisions. It is stated that except for the Code of Criminal Procedure, Ukrainian court legislation does not have the legal enforcement of an independent demand to provide motivation of judicial decisions. In this respect, the author offers to make certain changes in the procedural legislation of the Ukraine except for the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Ukraine which already has all necessary provisions. Keywords: Law studies, law enforcement, requirement, legality, justification, motivation, decision, practice, legislation, court.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. O sudebnom reshenii v grazhdanskom dele: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Ukrainy ot 18.12.2009 g. N 14. // http://zakon.rada.gov.ua.
2. Nikolaychenko O. O znachenii motivirovochnoy chasti sudebnogo resheniya / O. V. Nikolaychenko // Mezhdunarodnaya zaochnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Voprosy sovremennoy yurisprudentsii (Rossiya, g. Novosibirsk, 6 fevralya 2012g.) /http://sibac.info/index.php/ 3. Manukyan V. Mezhdunarodnaya zashchita prav cheloveka: pravo, pretsedenty, komentarii: nauchno-praktichesoe posobie. / V. I. Manukyan – K.: Istina, 2010. – 477 s. 4. De Sal'via M. Pretsedenty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. Rukovodyashchie printsipy sudebnoy praktiki, otnosyashchiesya k Evropeyskoy konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnikh svobod. Sudebnaya praktika s 1960 po 2002 g. / M. De Sal'via. – SPb. : Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2004. – 1240 s. 5. Sultanov A. O probleme motivirovannosti sudebnykh aktov, cherez prizmu Postanovleniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka / A. R. Sultanov // Arbitrazhnoe pravo. – 2007.-¹ ¹178 (1952)./ http://www.yurclub.ru/docs/arbitration/. 6. Yarkov V. Kommentariy k APK RF / pod. red.. V. V. Yarkova. M.: BEK, 2003. 7. Polyakov Yu. K voprosu o nezavisimosti suda / Yu. N. Polyakov // «Gosudarstvo i pravo».-2000.-¹10. – S. 85. 8. Vikut M. Zakonnost' i obosnovannost' aktov sotsialisticheskogo pravosudiya kak glavnoe uslovie vypolneniya zadach grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva / M. A. Vikut // Tsivilisticheskie problemy pravovogo statusa lichnosti v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve .-Saratov, 1982. – S. 124. 9. Ponomarenko V. A. Motivirovannost' sudebnogo resheniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse : avtoref. diss.. kand.. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2007. 10. Fil'chenko I. G. Protsessual'nye garantii prinyatiya obosnovannogo sudebnogo resheniya v grazhdanskom protsesse: avtoref. diss.. kand.. yurid. nauk. Voronezh , 2010. 11. Lebed' K. Resheniya arbitrazhnogo suda / K. A. Lebed'. – M., 2005. – 116 s. 12. Zagaynova S. Sudebnye akty v mekhanizme realizatsii sudebnoy vlasti v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse // S. K. Zagaynova. – M. : Volters Kluver. – 2007. – 400 s. 13. Tolochko A. N. Rol' motivirovki v obespechenii zakonnosti, obosnovannosti i spravedlivosti aktov sotsialisticheskogo pravosudiya, vynosimykh sudom pervoy instantsii po ugolovnym delam: avtoref. diss.. kand.. yurid. nauk, Khar'kov, 1985. 14. Afanas'ev S. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo: teoretiko-prakticheskoe issledovanie vliyaniya Evropeyskoy Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod na rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo: avtoref. dis.. doktora yurid. nauk, Saratov, 2010. 15. Kapl?na O. ?. Pravozastosovne tlumachennya sudom norm krim?nal'no-protsesual'nogo prava: avtoref. dis.. doktora yuridichnikh nauk, Khark?v, 2009 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
