|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Pavlova, Y.I. (2012). The role of concession agreements for the pipeline
transportation within the legal system and its character
within the framework of private law. Law and Politics, 12, 2068–2073. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51888
Pavlova, Y.I. The role of concession agreements for the pipeline transportation within the legal system and its character within the framework of private law.Abstract: The author analyzed the publications on the legal nature of the concession agreements, which suggest that the concession agreement on pipeline transportation as an international contract. The presence of foreign elements in the concession contract on pipeline transportation, where the concessionaire is a foreign legal entity or person, may include the state as an equal party to the private international contract. Keywords: concession agreement, pipelines, international contract, the State as a subject of the contract, innominate contract (sui generis).
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. R. Doak Bishop, James Crawford, William Michael Reisman. Foreign investment disputes: cases, materials and commentary. Kluwer Law International, 2005;
2. Bernshteyn I. N. Ocherk kontsessionnogo prava SSSR. M., 1930. S. 18; 3. Gallov V. V., Lomidze O. G., Zinchenko S. A. Kontsessionnoe soglashenie – pravovaya forma vzaimodeystviya biznesa i gosudarstva // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»; 4. Doronina N. G. K voprosu o pravovoy prirode kontsessionnykh soglasheniy // Pravo i ekonomika. 1997. ¹ 1. S. 53; 5. Doronina N. G., Semilyutina N. G. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo i investitsii: nauch.-prakt. issled. M.: Yuridicheskaya firma «Kontrakt», Volters Kluver, 2011. S. 84; 6. Dudikov M. V. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie nedropol'zovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: istoricheskiy aspekt i zarubezhnyy opyt. Moskva: Audit nedropol'zovaniya i konsalting , 2011; 7. Zoloeva Ya. O. Kontsessionnye i inye dogovory s inostrannymi investorami v oblasti dobychi poleznykh iskopaemykh: dissertatsiya kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Moskva, 2003; 8. Kokin V. N. Nedropol'zovanie: teoretiko-pravovoy analiz. M., 2005. S. 132; 9. Marysheva N. I. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. M.: Yuridicheskaya firma «Kontrakt», Volters Kluver, 2010; 10. Naletov K. I. Eshche raz o pravovoy prirode kontsessionnogo soglasheniya // Pravo i politika. 2005 ¹3 S.; 11. Novikov A. I. Kontsessionnye mekhanizmy usileniya mezhdunarodnoy investitsionnoy konkurentosposobnosti morskikh neftegazovykh proektov v RF. Disser. k.e.n. Moskva, 2007; 12. Novikov A. I. Neftegazovye proekty na shel'fe: kontsessionnye mekhanizmy i investitsionnaya konkurentosposobnost'. M.: Izd-vo RAGS, 2006. S. 21; 13. Nosov E. K krizisu ponyatiya kontsessionnogo dogovora // Sovetskoe pravo. 1926. ¹ 3-4; 14. Savinova O.N. Dogovornoe regulirovanie kontsessionnykh otnosheniy po zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Kazan': Novoe znanie, 2006. 200 s.; 15. Sedletskaya E. G. K Voprosu o pravovoy kvalifikatsii kontsessionnogo soglasheniya. http://justicemaker.ru/ view-article.php?id=4&art=1438; 16. Seliverstov S. S. Kontsessionnye soglasheniya v Rossii: perspektivy primeneniya v sfere truboprovodnogo transporta // Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. Spetsial'nyy vypusk. Energetika i pravo: truboprovodnyy transport. May 2006. S. 71; 17. Sosna S. A. Kontsessionnoe soglashenie – novyy vid dogovora v rossiyskom prave. M., 1995. S. 32; 18. Tal' L. S. Kontsessionnye dogovory gorodskikh obshchestvennykh upravleniy // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 1915. ¹ XI-XII. S. 32 |
© 1998 – 2025 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
