The single complex crime and the aggregate crimes:
the issue of distinguishing.

Skornyakov, A.V. (2012). The single complex crime and the aggregate crimes: the issue of distinguishing. Law and Politics, 11, 1918–1924. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51867

Skornyakov, A.V. The single complex crime and the aggregate crimes: the issue of distinguishing.

Abstract: When qualifying the single complex crimes, one often faces difficulties with the establishment of the border which separates them for the aggregate crimes. The variety of single complex crimes requires difference in approaches to this problem. That is why the author views both theoretical legislative positions on a certain type of complex crime, provides for their characteristic features, as well as differences from the aggregate crimes, which allows to find the way to distinguish each type of single complex crime and aggregate crimes, based on practical examples.

Keywords:

jurisprudence, aggregate, single, complex, crime, continuing crime, lasting crime, combined crime, alternative, distinguishing.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

The article is published in the version approved by the reviewers (after receiving a positive review recommending the manuscript for publication) with corrections made by the author (after receiving the editor’s comments, if any).
Read all reviews on this article

References

1. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii
2. Garbatovich D.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii mnozhe stvennosti prestupleniy pri sbyte narkoticheskikhsredstv // Narkokontrol'. 2009. № 4. S. 37 – 39.
3. Esakov G.A., Rarog A.I., Chuchaev A.I. Nastol'naya kni ga sud'i po ugolovnym delam. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-voprospekt, 2007. 576 s.
4. Karaev T.E. Povtornost' prestupleniy. M.: Yurid.lit., 1983. 117 s.
5. Korneeva A.V. Teoreticheskie osnovy kvalifikatsiiprestupleniy. M., TK Velbi, Izd-vo prospekt 2007. 176 s.
6. Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii pre stupleniy. M. : Yurist', 2007. 304 s.
7. Kulichenko N.I. Ugolovno-pravovaya otsenka edinich nogo slozhnogo prestupleniya: Avtoref. ... dis. kand.yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2006. 27 s.
8. Kurs rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast' / Podred. V.N. Kudryavtseva, A.V. Naumova. M. : Spark, 2001. 767 s.
9. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast'. T 1: Uchenie oprestuplenii /Pod red. N.F. Kuznetsovoy, I.M. Tyazh kova. M.: Zertsalo, 1999. 592 s.
10. Malkov V.P. Sovokupnost' prestupleniy (Voprosykvalifikatsii i naznacheniya nakazaniya). Kazan': Izd vo Kazansk. gos. un-ta, 1974. 307 s.
11. Pitetskiy V.V. Sostavnye normy v ugolovnom praveRossii: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Krasno yarsk, 2004. 25 s.
12. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. T. 1./Pod red. L.V. Inogamovoy-Khegay, V.S. Komisarova,A.I. Raroga. M.: Prospekt, 2006. 520 s.
13. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast'. T. 2./Pod red. L.V. Inogamovoy-Khegay, V.S. Komisarova,A.I. Raroga. M.: Prospekt, 2006. 626 s.
14. Sbornik Postanovleniy Plenumov Verkhovnykh SudovSSSR i RSFSR (Rossiyskoy Federatsii) po ugolov nym delam. M.: Spark, 1997. 425 s.
15. Ektov A.S. Ponyatie dlyashchegosya prestupleniya //Ugolovnyy zakon: sostoyanie i problemy primeneniya.Ryazan', 2006. S. 131-135.
16. Engel'gardt A. Sovershenie dvukh i bolee prestuple niy v otsutstvie sovokupnosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 3. S. 79 – 82