Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Mikhailov, A.M. Basic stages of genesis of the continental legal dogmas.

Abstract: The article includes a review on the development of legal dogmas in the continental legal studies. The author considers that dogmatic jurisprudence had formed the basis for the professional legal culture and key types of legal activities. The starting point of its evolution is the medieval school of glossators. The philosophical bases for the continental legal dogmas were formed by the scholastics. The process of the evolution of the dogmatic jurisprudence may be divided into three main stages. The first stage is medieval and it is represented by the academic school of glossators and commentators (post-glossators). The second period is characterized by the formation of the cultural and philosophical bases for the dogmatic traditions, which were formed due to the humanistic school of lawyers and the school of natural law. The third period is represented by the historical school of law, and the jurisprudence of definitions, which completed the development of the dogmatic jurisprudence.

Keywords:

jurisprudence, legal dogmas, continental legal system, general theory of law, glossators, commentators, humanistic school, school of natural law, historic school of lawyers, jurisprudence of definitions.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Alekseev N.N. Osnovy filosofii prava. SPb., 1999.
2. Alekseev N.N. Ocherki po obshchey teorii gosudarstva. Osnovnye predposylki i gipotezy gosudarstvennoy nauki. M., 2008.
3. Anners E. Istoriya evropeyskogo prava. M., 1996.
4. Berman G. Dzh. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya. M., 1998.
5. V.A. Tumanov. Izbrannoe. M., 2010.
6. Gurvich G.D. Yuridicheskiy opyt i plyuralisticheskaya filosofiya prava // Gurvich G.D. Filosofiya i sotsiologiya prava. Izbrannye sochineniya. SPb., 2004.
7. David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. M., 2009.
8. Dozhdev D.V. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M., 2011.
9. D'yachek T. I. Pravovoe uchenie Georga Fridrikha Pukhty: dogmaticheskiy aspekt. Avtoref. diss… kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2009.
10. Iering R. Zadacha sovremennoy yurisprudentsii // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Moskovskogo yuridicheskogo obshchestva. M., 1883. T. XIII. ¹8.
11. Iering R. fon. Dukh rimskogo prava // R. f. Iering. Izbrannye trudy. V 2 t. T. II. SPb., 2006.
12. Iering R. fon. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. M., 2008.
13. Isaev I.A. Politica hermetica: skrytye aspekty vlasti. M., 2002.
14. Karapetov A.G. Politika i dogmatika grazhdanskogo prava: istoricheskiy ocherk // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda. ¹4. 2010.
15. Korkunov N.M. Istoriya filosofii prava. M., 2010.
16. Korkunov N.M. Istoriya filosofii prava. Posobie k lektsiyam. SPb., 1915.
17. Kuznetsov K.A. K kharakteristike istoricheskoy shkoly yuristov. Odessa, 1914.
18. Kuznetsov K.A. Reforma yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya v Germanii (okonchanie) // Yuridicheskiy vestnik. 1889. T. 1. Kn. 4.
19. Modderman V. Retseptsiya rimskogo prava. SPb., 1888.
20. Muromtsev S.A. Retseptsiya rimskogo prava na Zapade. M., 1886.
21. Nechaev V.M. Pandekty v rimskom prave // Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' F.A. Brokgauza i I.A. Efrona. (http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/brokgauz_efron/137473/)
22. O.S. Ioffe. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. M., 2003.
23. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskiy kurs v 3 t. Otv. red. M.N. Marchenko. T. 2. M., 2001.
24. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskiy kurs v 3 t. Otv. red. M.N. Marchenko. T. 2. M., 2001.
25. Pakhman S.V. O sovremennom dvizhenii v nauke prava. SPb., 1882.
26. Pokrovskiy I.A. Estestvenno-pravovye techeniya v istorii grazhdanskogo prava. SPb., 1909.
27. Pokrovskiy I.A. Istoriya rimskogo prava. SPb., 1999.
28. Poldnikov D.Yu. Dogovornye teorii glossatorov. M., 2008.
29. Pukhta G.F. Kurs rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1874. Tom. I.
30. Rozin V.M. Genezis i sovremennye problemy prava. M., 2001.
31. S.A. Muromtsev Izbrannye trudy po rimskomu i grazhdanskomu pravu. M., 2004.
32. S.A. Muromtsev. Izbrannye trudy po rimskomu i grazhdanskomu pravu. M., 2004.
33. Skakun O.F. Obshchee sravnitel'noe pravovedenie. Akademicheskiy kurs. Kiev, 2008.
34. Stoyanov A. N. Metody razrabotki polozhitel'nogo prava i obshchestvennoe znachenie yuristov ot glossatorov do kontsa XVIII stoletiya. Khar'kov, 1862.
35. Taranovskiy F.V. Istoricheskoe i metodologicheskoe vzaimootnoshenie istorii, dogmy i politiki prava // Zhurnal Ministerstva Yustitsii. Mart 1907.
36. Taranovskiy F.V. Entsiklopediya prava. Spb., 2001.
37. Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoy nauki. Ekaterinburg, 2001.
38. Tarasov N.N. Stanovlenie kontinental'noy pravovoy nauki i yuridicheskoe myshlenie (metodologicheskie aspekty) // Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. Irkutsk, 2001. ¹ 2.
39. Teoriya prava i gosudarstva. Otv. red. G.N. Manov. M., 1996.
40. Tsar'kov I.I. O pravovykh printsipakh v srednevekovoy yurisprudentsii // Pravovedenie. 2003. ¹2.
41. Tsar'kov I.I. Razvitie pravoponimaniya v evropeyskoy traditsii prava. SPb., 2006.
42. Tsvaygert K., Ketts Kh. Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava. M., 2000. T. I.
43. Chestnov I.L. Aktual'nye problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava. Epistemologiya gosudarstva i prava. Uchebnoe posobie. SPb., 2004.
44. Chestnov I.L. Istoriya politicheskikh i pravovykh ucheniy: teoretiko-metodologicheskoe vvedenie. SPb., 2009.
45. Shershenevich G.F. Istoriya filosofii prava. SPb., 2001.
46. Berman H.J. Law and Revolution II. The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition. L., 2003.
47. Cappelletti M., Merryman J.H., Perillo J.M. The Italian Legal System. Stanford, 1967.
48. Cruz P. de, Comparative Law in a Changing World. 2nd ed. L., Sydney, 1999.
49. Engelmann W. Die Schuldlehre der Postglossatoren und ihre Fortentwickelung. Leipzig, 1895.
50. Gerber C.F. von, System des deutschen Privatrechts. Jena, 1855. 12th ed. S. XVII;
51. Hofmann H. From Jhering to Radbruch: on the logic of traditional legal concepts to the social theories of law to the renewal of legal idealism // A History of the Philosophy of Law in the Civil Law World, 1600 – 1900. L., N.-Y. 2009.
52. Jhering R. v. Scherz und Ernst in der Jurisprudenz. Leipzig, 1904.
53. Kaufmann G. Die Geschichte der deutschen Universitaten. Bd. I. Stuttgart, 1888.
54. Landsberg E. Die Glosse des Accursius und Ihre Lehre Vom Eigenthum. Leipzig, 1883.
55. Sohm R. Institutiones des rom. Rechts. Au? . 1903.
56. Tuori K. Ancient Romal lawyers and modern legal ideals. Studies on the impact of contemporary concerns in the interpretation of ancient Roman legal history. Frankfurt am Main, 2007.
57. Zimmermann R. Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law. The Civilian Tradition Today. 2001
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.