Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Aleksova, A.V. Participation of specialist in investigation of crimes related to unlawfully produced firearms.

Abstract: Use of knowledge of knowledgeable persons is an inalienable part of an efficient process of investigation of crimes, which are related to the use of unlawfully produced firearms. The article is devoted to the specific features and criteria for the work of specialists when the investigator examines the crime scene, holds questioning, search or assigns expertise. Participation of a specialist allows one to gain information in order to initiate a criminal case, to form a tactic for the investigative actions, and to define whether an expertise is needed.

Keywords:

jurisprudence, arms, investigator, specialist, expert, knowledge, examination, questioning, search, expertise.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Borodkina T.N. Realizatsiya protsessual'nogo statusa spetsialista na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya, M.,
2. 2009 S. 70-71.
3. Bykov V. Zaklyuchenie spetsialista // Zakonnost'. 2004. N 9. S. 23.
4. Grishina E.P. Takticheskie zadachi uchastiya spetsialista v doprose obvinyaemogo// Sledovatel', ¹2, 2007, S. 34-35.
5. Danilkina V.M. Organizatsionnye aspekty naznacheniya sudebnykh ekspertiz//Sudebnaya ekspertiza, ¹3, 2009 S. 69.
6. Zaklyuchenie eksperta ¹1524 2008 ot 16 iyulya 2008 goda. Arkhiv EKU UVD PK za 2008 god.
7. Orlov Yu. Spetsialist – eto svedushchee litso, ne zainteresovannoe v iskhode dela // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. ¹4.
8. S. 36.
9. Komarinets B.M. Uchastie ekspertov-kriminalistov v provedenii sledstvennykh deystviy po osobo opasnym prestup-
10. leniyam protiv lichnosti//Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy. M. 1964, sb. 1 (2) S. 21-22.
11. Lapshin V.E. Teoreticheskie osnovy ekspertizy mesta proisshestviya// Ekspert-kriminalist, ¹3, 2009, S. 3.
12. Mamoshin M.A. K voprosu ob uchasti spetsialista v otdel'nykh sledstvennykh deystviyakh//Ekspert-kriminalist ¹1,
13. 2010, S. 7.
14. Podvolotskiy I.N. K voprosu reglamentatsii ispol'zovaniya rezul'tatov primeneniya spetsial'nykh znaniy v kachestve
15. dokazatel'stv po ugolovnym delam// Sledovatel' ¹3, 2004, S. 45.
16. Polyakova M.A. Ispol'zovanie spetsial'nykh poznaniy i pomoshchi spetsialista na pervonachal'nom etape rassledovaniya
17. prestupleniy//Ekspert-kriminalist, ¹3, 2009, S. 5, 6.
18. Polyakova M.A. Ispol'zovanie spetsial'nykh poznaniy i pomoshchi spetsialista na pervonachal'nom etape rassledovaniya
19. prestupleniy// Ekspert-kriminalist ¹3, 2009 S. 5.
20. Shcherbakovskiy M.G., Kravchenko A.A. Primenenie spetsial'nykh znaniy pri raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy/
21. M.G. Shcherbakovskiy, A.A. Kravchenko. – Khar'kov: Un-t vnutr. del, 1999. – S. 24.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.