Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Kozhevnikov, O.A. Some problems related to distinguishing the jurisdiction over cases of courts of general jurisdiction and the cases of the Constitutional (Ustav) courts of the constituent subjects of the Russian Federations, as well as the ways to solve these problems.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the practice of application of Art. 27 of the Federal Constitutional Law of 31.12.1996 N. 1-FKZ “On the Judicial System of the Russian Federation”. As part of this study, the author comes to a conclusion that the dispositive character of these provisions allows for the unfounded widening of the scope of discretion by the Constitutional (Ustav) Courts of the constituent subjects of the Russian Federation in the sphere of confl ict-resolution.

Keywords:

jurisprudence, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Constitutional (Ustav) Courts of the constituent subjects of the Russian Federation, jurisdiction, judicial disputes, the courts of general jurisdiction, the judicial system of the Russian Federation, the State Duma of the Russian Federation, the law.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 07.10.2005 N 342-O.
2. “Po zaprosu Gosudarstvennogo Sobraniya - Kurultaya Respubliki Bashkortostan o proverke konstitutsionnosti pun-
3. kta 1 stat'i 4 Federal'nogo zakona “Ob advokatskoy deyatel'nosti i advokature v Rossiyskoy Federatsii” // CPS
4. Konsul'tant Plyus.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.