|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Bykov, V.M. (2012). The new law on home arrest of the suspect or the accused: scientifi c commentary. Law and Politics, 3, 481–486. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51712
Bykov, V.M. The new law on home arrest of the suspect or the accused: scientifi c commentary.Abstract: The article is devoted to the new Federal Law on Home Arrest. The author points out that the new law provides more detailed regulation of use of home arrest as a means of pre-trial restrictions. At the same time this new law has some quite questionable issues. The author then offers the ways to amend and improve the law, which in the author’s opinion, should be passed with due amendments. Keywords: jurisprudence, pre-trial restrictions, home arrest, court, terms of arrest, deposit, prohibitions and limitation, decision of the court, control, police.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Bagautdinov F. Novaya mera presecheniya v UPK RF – domashniy arest. //Zakonnost'. 2002. ¹10. S. 14-16.
2. Bykov V. M., Liskov D. A. Domashniy arest kak novaya mera presecheniya po UPK RF. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2004. 3. ¹4. S. 12-14. 4. Bykov V. Novyy zakon o zaloge kak mere presecheniya. //Zakonnost'. 2010. ¹9. S. 26-30. 5. Dzhuzhoma V. V. «Kontroliruemaya svoboda» - domashniy arest s ispol'zovaniem elektronnykh sredstv nablyudeniya 6. i kontrolya za osuzhdennym: al'ternativnoe ugolovnoe nakazanie ili ocherednoy primer neudachnogo zaimstvovaniya 7. inostrannogo opyta? //Vestnik rossiyskoy pravovoy akademii. 2009. ¹1. S. 64-67. 8. Kalinkin S. Primenenie sudami mer presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu, zaloga i domashnego aresta. 9. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. ¹2. 10. Karetnikov A. S., Arzamastseva K. A. Yavlyaetsya li deyatel'nost' suda po rassmotreniyu i razresheniyu khodataystv 11. dolzhnostnykh lits organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya sudebnym kontrolem? //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. ¹4. S. 12. 68. 13. Kolokolov N. A. Zalog, domashniy arest: stanovlenie praktiki. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. ¹11. (Stat'ya 2). 14. Mel'nikov V. Yu. Problemy primeneniya domashnego aresta kak mery presecheniya. //Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 15. 2007. ¹3. S. 72. 16. Ovchinnikov Yu. G., Zagvozdkin N. N. Osnovaniya dlya izbraniya mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta v ugolov- 17. nom protsesse Rossii. //Sledovatel'. 2004. ¹1. S. 14-21. 18. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 8 fevralya. 19. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 9 dekabrya. 20. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2011. 21 dekabrya. 21. Saltykov E. V. Otmena ili izmenenie mery presecheniya v vide domashnego aresta. //Vestnik rossiyskoy pravovoy 22. akademii. 2008. ¹2. S. 35-37. 23. Solov'ev I. N. Problemnye voprosy ispolneniya domashnego aresta. //Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2010. ¹13. 24. Sterkhov P., Sterkhova I. Sudebnyy kontrol' i problemy primeneniya domashnego aresta i zaloga v kachestve mer 25. presecheniya. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2008. ¹3. S. 79-82. |
© 1998 – 2025 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
