Problems of construction of sanctions for the willfully causing grave harm to human health.


	Law and Politics Reference: Fedotova, N.P. Problems of construction of sanctions for the willfully causing grave harm to human health. // Law and Politics. 2011. № 12. P. 2028-2035. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51645 Fedotova, N.P. Problems of construction of sanctions for the willfully causing grave harm to human health. Abstract: The article is devoted to the problem of construction of sanctions for the willfully causing the grave harm to human health. The science of criminal law did not pay enough attention to this issue. The need for a new study is due to the amendments in the criminal legislation. The author establishes the position for the optimization of sanctions, e.g. for the sanction of 3-4 years of imprisonment, taking into account the degree of social danger and the personality of the criminal. Keywords: jurisprudence, sanctions, legislation, health, grave harm, system, punishment, person, convict, social danger. This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register References 1. Prokhorov L.A. Obshchie nachala naznacheniya i preduprezhdeniya retsidivnoy prestupnosti. – Omsk, 1980. S.20. 2. Polikarpova I.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za umyshlennoe prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu. – M., 2009. 3. S.111. 4. Kozlov A.P. Ugolovno-pravovye sanktsii (problemy postroeniya, klassifikatsii i izmereniya). – Krasnoyarsk, 5. 1989. S.71. 6. Naumov A.O. O ser'eznoy uyazvimosti odnogo iz poslednikh zakonoproektov o vnesenii popravok v UK RF. // 7. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №1. S.38-39. 8. Kibal'nik A. K chemu privedet «gumanizatsiya» ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva? // Zakonnost', 2011, №9. 9. S..22-25. 10. Martsev A., Mikhan' O. Ugolovno-pravovaya klassifikatsiya prestupleniy. // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2005, №5, 11. S.49-51. 12. Pitetskiy V.V. Kategoriya prestupleniy i printsip spravedlivosti v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve. // Gosudarstvo 13. i pravo, 2005, №4. S.91-94. 14. Verina G. Ogranichenie svobody kak vid nakazaniya v svete zakonodatel'nykh novell. // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, 15. №5. S.8-10. 16. Artemenko N., Karasova A. Ogranichenie svobody: zakonodatel'nyy potentsial i vozmozhnosti primeneniya. // 17. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2011, №4, S.4-8. 18. Brilliantov A.V. Differentsiatsiya nakazaniya: ugolovno-pravovye i ispolnitel'nye problem. // Avtoref…dok. 19. yurid.nauk. – M., 1998. S.33. 20. Rakhmanov E.N. Zashchita prav cheloveka ot kriminal'nykh ugroz v usloviyakh globalizatsii: kriminologicheskiy i 21. ugolovno-pravovoy analiz. – M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2008. S.279-280. 22. Artemenko A. Tekhnologii naznacheniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya: teoreticheskie i pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty. 23. // Ugolovnoe pravo, 2010, №3, ch.4-8. 24. Zhalinskiy A.E. Sovremennoe nemetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. – M.: TK. Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2004, S.308-309. 25. Antonov I.M. Penalizatsiya prestupleniy, prichinyayushchikh vred zdorov'yu. // Avtoref. dis…kand.yurid.nauk. 26. – Vladivostok, 2004. S.9, 23. 27. Borodin S.V. Prestupleniya protiv zhizni. – M.: Yurist', 1999. S.347-348.

Journals

Books

Fedotova, N.P. Problems of construction of sanctions for the willfully causing grave harm to human health.