Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Associations of artists of the beginning of the XXI century in the context of the development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg

Din Zhiwei

Postgraduate student, Department of Art History and Pedagogy of Art, A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University

191186, Russia, Saint Petersburg, nab. Sinks, 48, room 6, room 51

dingzhiwei@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2023.10.48502

EDN:

GLRPOQ

Received:

09-10-2023


Published:

06-11-2023


Abstract: The activity of modern art associations, creative unions and art groups of professional artists of St. Petersburg is currently a little-studied and debatable issue. The specifics of St. Petersburg communities of this kind are closely connected with the traditions of the local art school and at the same time innovative, and sometimes are radical creative searches of their representatives. Such a combination leads to the formation of a diverse, but heterogeneous and mobile cultural space of the city on St. Petersburg. To understand its specifics, it is necessary to analyze the structure, composition and content of the work of the artistic associations of St. Petersburg, relevant for the beginning of the XXI century. In modern St. Petersburg, the process of forming art associations of various formations continues, which contributes to the development of fine art and the approval of its main forms, themes and genres. The main contribution of this research is to identify the main reasons for the creation of "young" creative associations whose activities are not related to the work of the Union of Artists of Russia, as well as to highlight the processes of their involvement in the cultural life of the city. It has been established that the "young" creative associations are characterized by unity of ideological and stylistic views and concepts, as well as a very flexible nature that allows them to be actively involved in the artistic life of St. Petersburg and the whole of Russia, to participate in the most diverse projects.


Keywords:

art association, union of artists, exhibition, art group, artistic life, Saint-Petersburg, exhibition and commercial practice, educational activities, creative union, unofficial association

This article is automatically translated.

The artistic life of St. Petersburg has been formed for several centuries and continues its development in the XXI century. Various associations and unions of professional artists played an important role in this process, especially in the second half of the XIX– XX century. They are understood as various types of communities of artists and/or representatives of creative specialties, which may include elements of a trade union, as well as a creative and commercial union. Moreover, at different stages of the development of such associations, some of the listed aspects of the work could be emphasized, and some went into the background. For example, in Soviet times, the only official community known as the Union of Artists of the USSR was basically a professional union created to represent and protect the rights and interests of its members in labor relations, was engaged in the distribution of government orders, workshops, vouchers, etc. Currently, various art associations operate in the Northern Capital, which have a direct impact on local artistic life. The activity of such communities in different regions of Soviet and post-Soviet Russia in the mid- second half of the XX century is considered in sufficient detail in the context of the problems of art development. Thus, this topic came into the focus of attention of E.Y. Degot, V.A. Tupitsyn, B.I. Ioganson, Yu.V. Leonycheva, D.V. Demkina, E.N. Alekseeva, etc. The art space of modern St. Petersburg has been characterized in the works of D.Y. Severyukhin, E.P. Stalinskaya, T.M. Milyukova, V.B. Vysotsky, etc. At the same time, there are practically no works that would comprehensively reveal the main features of how such groups participate in the development of modern creativity. Therefore, the purpose of this publication is to analyze the forms and activities of St. Petersburg art associations, as well as their impact on the formation of the art space of the city. In order to achieve this goal, it was necessary to solve such tasks as to identify the state of knowledge of the issue, to identify the main features of art groups, to show the role in the activation and development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg.

The influence of such associations on the artistic life of St. Petersburg is reasonably great and has certain features that relate to both the composition and the specifics of exhibition and commercial practice and educational activities. It affects not only the differences between generations — Soviet, post-Soviet and those who studied and were even born in the Russian Federation, for example, the so-called "generation of thirty-year-olds", but also the difference in art school. This publication is devoted to the formation of a general idea of their activities in the modern urban space and the identification of basic features, partly an attempt to typologize these communities. As a scientific and methodological basis for this research, the works of L.Yu. Gurevich [1, 2], who deals with the Leningrad underground and modern St. Petersburg painting, V.A. Ushakov, who studies the history of the development of the Leningrad — St. Petersburg Union of Artists, are considered. We also note the works of E.Yu. Andreeva [3], A.F. Dmitrenko and R.A. Bakhtiyarov [4, 5], L.V. Mochalov [6], V.A. Gusev and V.A. Lenyashin [7], D.Ya. Severyukhin [8, 9], which are significant for understanding all the nuances of the artistic life of the city in the past and present.] and others . They show the development of the Leningrad-Petersburg art school, but do not give a complete description of the activities of associations of professional artists at the present stage.

Currently, there are associations in St. Petersburg that have a long history. The largest, authoritative and mass of them is the former Leningrad branch of the Union of Artists of the USSR, now the regional creative public organization "St. Petersburg Union of Artists". Like its predecessor, the creative union today unites both artists and restorers, art historians. Members of the association receive workshops, orders, and also have the opportunity to interact within the framework of various creative projects, exhibitions, conferences. An Exhibition Center is open for exhibiting and selling the works of the participants.

This association was initially created on the initiative of the state to control professional artistic personnel from the point of view of ideology, partly to affirm the principles of socialist realism. However, at present the St. Petersburg Union of Artists is striving to restore and continue the traditions of Russian art of both the pre-Soviet and Soviet past. This is due to the history itself, since its origins come from pre-revolutionary times, and the form and structure are approved during the period of the country of the Soviets. As the art critic V.A. Ushakov noted, "the choice in favor of realism allowed us to preserve the traditions of authentic Russian realism and a magnificent art school with all the negative sides of ideological pressure" [10, p. 7]. Especially relevant in the 2000s, when the demand for traditionalism increased from the Russian society.

The St. Petersburg Creative Union of Artists (IFA) should also be included among the major associations. It consists of painters, graphic artists, photographers, designers, jewelers, icon painters, as well as masters of decorative and applied arts, sculptors. Among the innovations in the structure of the community should be attributed the section of "new media" [6], which made it possible for artists who are passionate about creating images and art objects using modern computer and Internet technologies to exhibit with the help of the association. This is especially important, since there is an acute shortage of exhibition sites in the city to display such works. The Union, also as a "senior" brother, has a small fund of workshops, but still focuses on exposition and exhibition, commercial and educational work, for example, the so-called "creative estates" have become widely known to the public.

The St. Petersburg Creative Union of Artists positions itself as a continuation of the traditions of the Leningrad City Committee of Graphic Artists [11]. Art historian A.K. Florkovskaya, who studied his activities, considers this organization as an illustrative example of a community of artists of the late Soviet period. She believes that it combines the features of pre-revolutionary institutions and the "sociopolitical realities of the last Soviet decades" [12, p. 181], which is characteristic of the city on the Neva. In many ways, it was created in opposition to the Union of Artists of the USSR, since initially it included those artists who were not in the first and did not want to follow the official line in art. In fact, both organizations have long acted as trade unions for those who were loyal to the authorities and those who advocated alternative and free creativity. However, now such a confrontation has leveled off, and both organizations have occupied their niches in the artistic life of St. Petersburg.

It is noteworthy that in addition to large public associations that functioned as trade unions and workshop funds, in the 1980s, small groups and unions of artists began to be created in Leningrad at that time, and literally in underground conditions. The discovery of such structures was connected with the attempts of the last wave of non-conformists, as their representative and alternative poet, prose writer V.B. Krivulin wrote, "to outline the limits of intellectual freedom" [13]. At the same time, they did not break as thoroughly as the Moscow conceptualists, with the previous tradition, preserved the continuity of generations. In the following years of the 1990s, there followed a rather sharp entry of the underground into the public scene, already in a completely different socio-cultural and political, as well as economic dimension. At the same time, the local art school, often reproached for the "archaic Leningrad tradition" [13], was formed somewhat away from the metropolitan mainstream, which allowed it to acquire even greater originality, including due to the heterogeneity of artistic associations and at the same time their close interaction with each other.

One of the most famous unions of this kind was the association "Mitki Creative Association", which was formed back in 1982 and gave rise to the development of an entire subculture. Currently, representatives of this association have grown from unofficial art to the level of "classics". They actively accept new "brothers" and "sisters" into their ranks, who continue the general line of "urban folklore" laid down by D.V. Shagin and V.N. Shinkarev. At the same time, the association, having received its own space in the central part of the city, has the opportunity to conduct exhibition activities, implements various cultural projects, for example, "Petersburg. Stops on demand", is engaged in education, conducting master classes, literary and musical evenings. Thus, this association bears the features of a kind of socio-aesthetic movement [14], which has a significant impact on the artistic life of the city on the Neva.

It is important to note that the St. Petersburg associations of contemporary artists, being from the same art school, often interact with each other. So, for example, in the recent past, the same "Mitki" were in collaboration with other art groups, for example, "Inaki", "Alipiy", "Island", "New Artists", etc. A huge influence on the cultural space of the city was also exerted by the art group "New Artists", created in Leningrad by the artist T.P. Novikov in 1982 and eventually turned into the New Academy of Fine Arts. Later, all these groups were transformed into the Association of Experimental Fine Arts (TEII), which later reborn into the art center "Pushkinskaya 10". If in the Soviet period the authors were united by the oppositional nature of creativity, then after perestroika there they formed and still form a free space that unites the creative potential of several art galleries, a concert venue, music clubs, recording studios, a children's theater and creative workshops of famous artists and musicians [15].

It is interesting that in St. Petersburg there is a constant renewal of such unions and associations: some disappear at the will of the creators and due to economic factors, while others appear. An example of this can be the creative group "Old Town" created back in the 1980s, which united artists, according to the leader of the group Ya.A. Antonyshev, who wanted to "preserve old houses" [16]. Their works related to the images of St. Petersburg, going back in time, constantly appeared on the exhibition grounds of the city. These could be their own projects of the same name or national teams, citywide and even nonresident. The activity of the "Old Town" continued until the dissolution of the group in 2020. After that, its members either started working independently, or joined other associations.

Creative unions as a kind of artistic associations are currently more typical for groups of young artists who are passionate about current trends in art or related professional interests. They rarely undergo registration as organizations. For example, the unofficial Art-World association was created around a creative workshop, which later turned into an art school. Its members include, first of all, graduates of the St. Petersburg Academy of Arts named after I.E. Repin, who not only work and exhibit together as followers of traditional art and innovators, but also teach their art to others [17]. According to a similar principle, such associations as "Artika", "Nevsky Artists", "Art Cart", "Firewall", etc. were created.

It should be noted that the modern artistic process has less influence on large associations and groups founded in the Soviet and post-Soviet period. The former act mostly as trade unions, while the latter are exhibition and commercial associations that help artists to unite, work together, promote their views on art and reduce dependence on the changing tastes of the public. Thus, the association "Association of Traveling Art Exhibitions of the XXI Century", opened in 2005, seeks to unite authors who are inclined to a realistic depiction of the world, content and preservation of the traditions of the past. The members of the association rely on educating the public, creating a special "cultural space" with their works, exhibitions and master classes [18]. Thus, associations of artists are now understood as forms and ways of influencing authors on the cultural space of the city.

It is noteworthy that the St. Petersburg associations of artists at the beginning of the XXI century are mainly represented by small creative groups and workshops. Such small forms, often not formalized officially, without a clearly formulated charter, are the most optimal formations for the modern saturated and extremely heterogeneous artistic life of St. Petersburg. At the same time, almost everyone openly declares their desire to continue the traditions of the St. Petersburg art school of the pre-Soviet and even Soviet period. It should also be noted that members of such communities create their works mainly in a realistic way, less often turn to abstract art and performance. In their work, the strengthening and enrichment of performance techniques is noticeable, especially in easel compositions and works of decorative and applied art. These processes have replaced the thirst for novelty, irony and cynicism, which were previously a priority. Moreover, artists are often members of the Union of Artists, but in parallel they may be in other structures, which opens up more opportunities for creative experiments for them.

Summarizing the analysis, we note that an important stage in the development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg at the end of the XX century was the creation of associations of artists whose work was not included in the framework of the exhibition activities of the Union of Artists. They were an alternative to official structures. At the beginning of the XXI century, the situation changed, as such communities of artists began to be created primarily for joint exhibition activities and sale of works, as well as as a way of positioning and projecting ideas and images into the cultural space of the city. Many unions of artists, especially young authors, are now being formed due to their desire to solve professional issues, get a job and simply earn bread. They are formed around workshops and creative teams, in a circle of acquaintances, sometimes growing into entire art schools or art galleries. Thus, "young" art associations have completely different reasons for creation, allow different authors to create diverse and multi-format projects and solve commercial issues. Moreover, if large and historical associations are multifunctional in terms of the composition of their members, then young and newest groups are, as a rule, unions of authors close to each other in appearance, genre and trend in art. The latter may consist of members of the Union of Artists and similar organizations, but common interests with other authors lead them to the need to create art groups. Their appearance, changes within them indicate the rich artistic life of the city.

References
1. Gurevich, L.Yu. (2007). Artists of the Leningrad underground: Biographical dictionary. St. Petersburg: Art.
2. Gurevich, L.Yu. (2002). Arefievsky circle. Comp. L. Gurevich. Series "Vanguard on the Neva". St. Petersburg.
3. Andreeva, E. Yu. (2011). “The Order of Unsaleable Painters” and Leningrad Expressionism. Dissolute righteous people, or the Order of mendicant painters. Exhibition catalogue, pp. 9–22. St. Petersburg: New Museum.
4. Dmitrenko, A.F., & Bakhtiyarov R.A. (2017). St. Petersburg (Leningrad) art school and contemporary art. St. Petersburg Artist, 25, 74–90.
5. Dmitrenko, A.F., & Bakhtiyarov, R.A. (2019). Leningrad school and realistic traditions of domestic painting. Leningrad school of painting. Essays on history, pp. 58–65. St. Petersburg: ARKA Gallery.
6. Mochalov, L. (2002) Group “Eleven”. A retrospective look with personal memories. Artist of St. Petersburg, 9, 9–11.
7. Gusev, V. A., & Lenyashin, V. A. (1981). Leningrad fine art is sixty years old. Fine art of Leningrad. Exhibition of works by Leningrad artists, pp. 13–19. Leningrad: Artist of the RSFSR.
8. Severyukhin, D.Ya. (2010). The art market of St. Petersburg-Petrograd-Leningrad, its role and significance in the history of the development of domestic fine art: dissertation ... Doctor of Art History: 17.00.04. Severyukhin Dmitry Yakovlevich. Moscow. State art-industry University named after S.G. Stroganov. Moscow.
9. Severyukhin, D.Ya., & Leykind O.L. (1997). “Artistic Society” in St. Petersburg. History in documents. Nevsky Archive. Vol. 3, pp. 434–448. St. Petersburg: Chernyshev Publishing House.
10. Ushakova, V.A. (2003). Past and present of the Leningrad-St. Petersburg Union of Artists. Artists to the city. Exhibition for the 70th anniversary of the St. Petersburg Union of Artists, pp. 7–13. St. Petersburg: Petropol.
11. St. Petersburg Creative Union of Artists (IFA). Retrieved from https://www.ifaspb.info/
12. Florkovskaya, A.K. (2017). Painting section of the City Committee of Graphic Artists as an example of the artistic community of the late Soviet era (1976–1988). Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. Tambov: Certificate, 5(79), 181–184.
13. Berg, M. Radicals and conservatives: two generations of the Russian underground. Gorky-Russian online publication. Retrieved from https://gorky.media/context/radikaly-i-konservatory-dva-pokoleniya-russkogo-andegraunda/
14. “Mitki” as an artistic association. Iskusstvoed.ru-a network resource about art and culture, 2019. Retrieved from https://iskusstvoed.ru/2019/11/17/mitki-kak-hudozhestvennoe-obedin/
15. ART center “Pushkinskaya-10”. Retrieved from https://p-10.ru/aboutus/#today
16. The case of the “Old City”-yesterday, today and tomorrow // Exhibition Center of the St. Petersburg Union of Artists. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20131003103337/http://www.spb-uniart.ru/index.php?id=1194
17. Creative Association of Artists of St. Petersburg “ArtMir”. ArtLib-library of fine arts. Retrieved from http://www.artlib.ru/index.php?id=12&idp=0&fp=2&uid=471&idg=1&sa=1
18. Peredvizhniki 21st century St. Petersburg. Retrieved from http://www.art-vystavka.spb.ru

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for review ("Associations of artists of the beginning of the XXI century in the context of the development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg"), judging by the title, could be the influence, role or place of associations of artists of the beginning of the XXI century in the development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg: the author himself claims that "the influence of such associations on the artistic life of St. Petersburg is reasonably large and has certain features ...", especially since "this publication is devoted to the formation of a general idea of their activities in modern urban space and the identification of basic features, partly an attempt to typologize these communities." The lack of specificity of the research program (the lack of formulations of the problem, object, subject of research, correlation of specific tasks with scientific methods of their solution) significantly complicates the verification of the result obtained. The reader has to guess and analytically identify, in the ratio of goal-setting and final conclusion, the essence of the scientific problem and the author's contribution to its resolution. Such uncertainty in the researcher's judgments, as a rule, indicates the initial stage of scientific research, which means that the author is trying to problematize some research field for further research. Such a field, based on the context of the article, is the artistic life of St. Petersburg within the 1980s-2020s (the object of research), which, unfortunately, the author does not give a specific definition. Meanwhile, taking into account the existing theoretical differences in understanding the nature of artistic life, the category defining the object of research must necessarily be formulated. The author does not explain the term "artistic life", but from the context it can be concluded that it consists exclusively of the examples of the activities of individual associations of artists given by the author and is exhausted by them — it is scant not only for St. Petersburg (Northern Palmyra), but also for the category "artistic life". Let's give an example of two irreducible positions regarding the interpretation of "artistic life" in Russian theoretical discourse. The first is to generalize as much as possible: that is, the artistic life of the region means the whole set of artistic creativity of the people inhabiting the region. Accordingly, an Honored Artist, a grandmother embroidering a patch on her grandson's shirt with a cross, an outstanding composer, and a schoolboy reading a rhyme to Santa Claus under the Christmas tree equally make their contribution to artistic life. Another position, declared in state strategic planning documents (for example, in the Strategy of State Cultural Policy for the period up to 2030), consists in the institutionalization of artistic life: that is, state documents take into account only that part of the artistic life of society that is documented in the reports of the activities of organizations and public institutions, including, of course, individual figures culture and arts, whose activities are recorded in specific documented indicators. In any case, the artistic life of St. Petersburg as a whole cannot be limited to the examples given by the author. And what contribution these examples have made to the artistic life of St. Petersburg can be said only on the basis of comparisons of the area described by the author with other types of expedient artistic activity. Based on the general problem field of artistic life described above, it is possible to deduce the problem of institutionalization of the communities of artists of St. Petersburg, to which the author, in the opinion of the reviewer, made a feasible contribution: "It is interesting that in St. Petersburg there is a constant renewal of such unions and associations: some disappear at the will of the creators and due to economic factors, and others are emerging"; "Creative unions as a kind of artistic associations are currently more typical for groups of young artists who are passionate about current trends in art or related professional interests. They rarely undergo registration as organizations," etc. The institutionalization of the St. Petersburg artist communities, as follows from the context of the presented study, is not an end in itself for most associations. And the author correctly notes that it (institutionalization) is not always directly related to artistic life (art projects, exhibitions, etc.), but nevertheless it can partially characterize the intensity of artistic life: the more institutionalized associations are, the more part of artistic life can be fixed and comprehended by theorists. At the same time, institutionalization is expressed not only by the presence of the charter of the organization, but also by specific artistic activity, which is somehow fixed in the media space. In this context, the author's appeal to primary sources reflecting various aspects of the institutionalization of the artistic life of St. Petersburg is valuable. The analysis of special literature and primary sources allowed the author to summarize his review with valuable conclusions: "an important stage in the development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg at the end of the XX century was the creation of associations of artists whose work was not included in the framework of the exhibition activities of the Union of Artists," and at the beginning of the XXI century, the situation changed, as such communities of artists began to be created First of all, for joint exhibition activities and the sale of works, as well as as a way of positioning and projecting ideas and images into the cultural space of the city." Thus, despite some confusion (opacity) of the research program, the author comes to a logical conclusion, the reasonableness of which is beyond doubt. In this regard, to improve the quality of the article, the reviewer recommends that the author specify the research program in the introduction. Since the author sees an evolution in the foundations of the institutionalization of St. Petersburg artists' associations, expressed at the end of the 20th century exclusively in the movement in opposition to the Union of Artists, and at the beginning of the 21st century in the search for ways of ideological and economic collaborations of artists for joint exhibition activities and positioning of original images in the cultural space of the city, perhaps this evolution was it would be advisable to designate it as a subject of research. The author does not pay special attention to the methodology of the study, but it is quite obvious that it is based on the historical and biographical reconstruction of the stages of institutionalization of the associations of artists of St. Petersburg. In addition to the thematic selection of sources, the author supports the study by analyzing and comparing the types of collaborations of artists for joint exhibition activities and positioning original images in the cultural space of the city, although the logical procedure of typology remains incomplete. In this regard, the reviewer notes that the typology of St. Petersburg artists' associations either needs to be completed by presenting its results in the final conclusion, or excluded from the introductory goal setting, and designated as a prospect for further research of the topic in conclusion. The author explains the relevance of the study by the special influence of artists' associations on the artistic life of St. Petersburg, but, at the same time, does not summarize in the final conclusion what exactly this influence manifests itself. Of course, the variety of collaborations of artists for joint exhibition activities is an indicator of the democratization and richness of the artistic life of Northern Palmyra, which, of course, must be said in conclusion, otherwise the logical connection between the relevance of the topic and the final conclusion disappears. The scientific novelty of the research, consisting in the author's generalization of the works of colleagues and primary sources testifying to the activities of various associations of artists of St. Petersburg, as well as in the conclusion about the evolution of the foundations of their institutionalization, is generally trustworthy. The author has maintained the scientific style of the text. The structure only partially reflects the logic of presenting the results of scientific research and needs to improve methodological support.
The bibliography, taking into account the author's reliance on a thematic selection of primary sources, generally reflects to some extent the problematic field of research: there is no analysis of scientific literature over the past 3-5 years, theoretical foundations have not been adequately disclosed, there is no foreign literature (is the artistic life of St. Petersburg not studied abroad?). The design style of paragraphs 1-4, 6, 8-10 needs to be adjusted taking into account the requirements of the editorial board and GOST. The appeal to opponents is generally correct, although the author avoids discussions with colleagues. The interest of the readership of the magazine "Culture and Art" in the research topic is certainly guaranteed. However, the author should, when finalizing, express the general research program more clearly so that the scientific novelty of the result obtained is more obvious to the reader.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

In the journal "Culture and Art" the author presented his article "Associations of artists of the beginning of the XXI century in the context of the development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg", which conducted a study of the activities of modern creative associations and their role in the formation of the socio-cultural environment. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that the artistic life of St. Petersburg has been formed for several centuries and continues its development in the XXI century. Various associations and unions of professional artists play an important role in this process, especially in the second half of the XIX– XX century. These organizations may include elements of a trade union, as well as a creative and commercial union. At different stages of the development of such associations, the author focuses on some of the listed aspects of the work. The relevance of the research is due to the fact that currently there are various both formal and informal creative associations operating in the Northern Capital, which have a direct impact on local artistic life. As a scientific and methodological basis for this study, the author examines the works of L.Yu. Gurevich, who is engaged in the Leningrad underground and modern St. Petersburg painting, V.A. Ushakov, who studies the history of the development of the Leningrad — St. Petersburg Union of Artists. In the course of the research, the author applied general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as historical, cultural and socio-cultural analysis. The purpose of this study is to analyze the forms and activities of St. Petersburg art associations, as well as their impact on the formation of the art space of the city. To achieve this goal, the author sets the following tasks: to identify the state of knowledge of the issue, to identify the main features of art groups, to analyze their role in the activation and development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg. Having analyzed the scientific validity of the problem, the author notes that the activities of such communities in different regions of Soviet and post-Soviet Russia in the middle and second half of the 20th century are considered in sufficient detail in the context of the problems of art development. At the same time, the author noted a negligibly small number of works that would comprehensively reveal the main features of how such formations participate in the development of modern creativity, practically none. In particular, the works of researchers of the artistic environment of St. Petersburg show the development of the Leningrad-Petersburg art school, but do not give a complete description of the activities of associations of professional artists at the present stage. Detailed coverage of this issue constitutes the scientific novelty of the study. The author reveals in detail the features of the activities of both official large and informal small art associations, such as the regional creative public organization "St. Petersburg Union of Artists", St. Petersburg Creative Union of Artists (IFA), "Mitki Creative Association", "Art World", "Association of Traveling Art Exhibitions XXI century" and others, focusing on the history of their creation, describing their goals, traditions, principles of formation and membership. The influence of such associations on the artistic life of St. Petersburg, according to the author, is reasonably great and has certain features that relate to both the composition and the specifics of exhibition and commercial practice and educational activities. Having conducted a historical and cultural analysis of the activities of creative associations, the author notes the tendency for artists to work in the realistic genre and return to traditional painting and even to certain creative traditions of pre-revolutionary Russia. An important stage in the development of the artistic life of St. Petersburg at the end of the XX century, the author considers the creation of associations of artists whose work was not included in the framework of the exhibition activities of the Union of Artists. They were an alternative to official structures. At the beginning of the XXI century, the author observes the transformation of the goals of creation: such communities of artists began to be created, first of all, for joint exhibition activities and sale of works, as well as as a way of positioning and projecting ideas and images into the cultural space of the city. In conclusion, the author presents a conclusion on the conducted research, which contains all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the peculiarities of the formation of the artistic environment of a large city is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The bibliographic list of the research consists of 18 sources, which seems sufficient for generalization and analysis of scientific discourse. The author fulfilled his goal, obtained certain scientific results that made it possible to summarize the material, showed deep knowledge of the studied issues. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication.