Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Man and Culture
Reference:

The forgotten name of the talented actor of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after L. Kaganovich (Moisei Yefimovich Zhelkover)

Gamalei Sof'ya Yur'evna

ORCID: 0000-0001-6401-1663

PhD in History

Department of State Legal Disciplines, Far Eastern Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

680030, Russia, Khabarovsk, lane. Dzerzhinsky, 20, of. 45

s.u.gamaley@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2024.5.44220

EDN:

BEJSOI

Received:

05-10-2023


Published:

01-11-2024


Abstract: The relevance of the research topic is due to the specifics of the cultural policy implemented in the Russian Federation, according to which culture is elevated to the rank of national priorities. Thus, in the process of implementing the "National Policy Strategy of the Russian Federation", it is necessary to take into account the accumulated historical experience. That is why the purpose of the work was to study the creativity of the actor of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after L. Kaganovich – Moses Efimovich Zhelkover. This talented actor worked in BIRGOSET throughout the entire period of its existence: from the day of its foundation in 1934 to 1949, when, due to a change in national policy towards the Jewish diaspora, all Jewish theaters of the USSR were closed. Based on the analysis of archival documents, the author revealed some facts of the biography of Moses Efimovich, the peculiarities of his creative and socio-political life. The analysis of the articles of periodicals helped to study the individual creative works of the actor in different productions of the Jewish theater. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the biography and creativity of this actor was not the subject of research by Soviet and Russian authors, as well as the activities of other members of the theater's acting troupe, since Soviet policy towards the Jewish diaspora has changed its vector more than once. The liquidation of the Jewish theater of Birobidzhan in 1949 led to the fact that some actors were repressed (F. Arones), others left the EAO and continued to work in other theaters of the country (E. Gelfand), the fate of the third, such as M. Zhelkover is unknown. In conclusion, the author comes to the conclusion that the actor M. Zhelkover is inextricably linked with BIRGOSET, whose work contributed to the formation of his own creative style. At the same time, the author of the article regrets the inability to trace the fate of the artist after the disbanding of the Jewish theater of Birobidzhan.


Keywords:

Jewish Theater, Moisei Zhelkover,, Jewish Autonomous Region,, Sender Blank, Jewish actors, Yakov Rosenfeld, Boris Miller, Uriel Acosta, Ovadis Family, Birobidzhan Star

This article is automatically translated.

Introduction

The difficult foreign policy situation that has arisen between the Russian Federation and other previously friendly states may lead to an aggravation of interethnic conflicts. That is why, as part of the implementation of the "Strategy of the State National Policy of the Russian Federation", it is necessary to turn to the historical experience of its implementation by the Soviet state in the 1920s and 1930s, when the Jewish Autonomous Region was created in the Far East as one of the options for solving the Jewish question. And although the reasons for the creation of this territorial unit in historiography are debatable, researchers such as F. N. Ryansky, A.M. Melikhov do not deny the presence of "political will" as the main factor in the construction of Birobidzhan [1; 2]. In addition, studying the features of the resettlement policy to the Far East, Y. V. Pikalov, N. N. Platunov, and I. V. Nam note the peaceful nature of the resettlement of Jews, when not methods of violence, but beliefs and propaganda were involved – the idea of building a separate territorial unit [3-5]. At the same time, none of the researchers denies the fact that in the 1930s, conditions for the qualitative development of Jewish culture were created in the new territory of the future Jewish Autonomous Region [6; 7]. Thus, simultaneously with the issuance of the Decree on the establishment of the EAO, the Jewish State Theater began its work in Birobidzhan. His activity was the subject of research by B. Kotlerman [8-14], V. S. Gurevich [15; 16] and E. I. Kudish [17]. However, while studying the history of the creation and creativity of the Jewish collective, the researchers did not pay due attention to the people who worked on the stage of this theater. Actors and directors who worked on the stage of the theater from the first days lived in the EAO and loved their city of Birobidzhan.

One of these people was the actor of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater, Moses Efimovich Zhelkover. His creative life began long before the formation of the Jewish Autonomous Region. However, the national policy of the Soviet government towards the Jewish people, the creation of the EAO, was met positively by Moses Efimovich, which is why he went to Birobidzhan as part of the first Jewish troupe and worked on its sidelines throughout the years of the theater's existence, until 1949.

The beginning of M. Zhelkovera's creative career

Moses Zhelkover was born in Poland into a poor Jewish family. Since childhood, he has felt his attraction to the theater. In his youth, Moses got acquainted with choristers from the local Warsaw Jewish collective and thus gained access behind the scenes. Later, around 1906, he managed to create his own small amateur band of enthusiasts like himself. Not having sufficient experience in stage productions, M. Zhelkover and his small troupe tried to simply copy what they saw on the stage of professional theaters and show it to the public (see: Gaiman, B. 30 years on stage // Birobidzhan Star. 1940. December 29. p. 4). Imitating adult actors of that time, young art lovers also traveled to nearby towns and, where they could, gave performances. They didn't have the money for these trips, so they got to the designated place one by one, as best they could. It is difficult to say how successful these productions were or whether they can be called a low-grade farce genre [18. C. 26], since no mention of these amateur performances has been preserved. But it is worth noting that the director of this amateur troupe was Moisei Efimovich Zhelkover.

It was only in 1910 that he managed to enter the professional Jewish theater of Rachelle. At first, he had to play the smallest roles, for a small reward. This is what forced the actor to work for a procurement worker and only occasionally attend rehearsals, and in the evenings participate in performances. It was these difficulties that testified to how difficult it was for a Jewish actor to achieve recognition in the pre-revolutionary period. Jewish groups have always existed, but because of the persecution of Jews, they were forced to play under the guise of a Jewish-German theater.

In 1911, Moses joined the troupe of Julis Adler and Lipkovsky, and thus began the nomadic life of the young actor. M. Zhelkover hoped to advance in the new team, so he constantly improved his talent, but instead of playing real roles, the entrepreneurs forced him to sing songs in low-grade plays. Such work burdened M. Zhelkover, but his love for the theater did not allow him to quit his profession. Therefore, a year later, once in Vilna, he joined the Genfer troupe, whose repertoire was more substantial and cultured. Here he is assigned such prominent roles as King Claudius in Hamlet (V. Shakespeare), de Santos in Uriel Acosta (K. Gutskov) and others. However, due to the outbreak of the First World War, the troupe broke up (see: Gaiman, B. 30 years on stage // Birobidzhan star. 1940. December 29, p. 4), Moses found himself out of work again. The period from 1914 to 1934 was one of the most difficult periods in his acting career. For almost 20 years, he has worked in various creative teams. Among the most successful in his work, the actor himself considered working in the troupe of the Jewish actress Esther-Rohl Kaminskaya, working in Ukraine. This group staged plays by Western European and Jewish writers. M. Zhelkover worked here for three years and gained a huge creative experience, which helped him strengthen himself as a professional. After the establishment of Soviet power, the actor worked in various Jewish troupes in the country.

In 1934, together with the first group of actors, he came to the educated Jewish Autonomous Region [17. P.23], in fact, he became one of the founders of the Birobidzhan State Theater, since, unlike young actors, he possessed a proper level of professionalism and could share the accumulated knowledge of the acting profession.

M. Zhelkover and the Jewish Theater of Birobidzhan

Over the years of working in the theater, the artist managed to find his second creative youth. Working with young people, according to him in an interview with the newspaper Birobidzhan Zvezda, he was getting younger himself. But as the eldest and one of the leading actors, it was he who played the leading roles in the theater's performances. He created the images of Menashe Vanderstraten in the play "Uriel Acosta", Avrom Ovadis in the play "The Ovadis Family" (see: Gaiman, B. 30 years on stage // Birobidzhan Star. 1940. December 29, p. 4). His game, as journalists noted in their articles, was characterized by genuine realism. It was for the high-quality performance of the artist's roles that the Jewish audience of Birobidzhan loved.

Naturally, the living conditions in the Soviet period stimulated the actor to engage not only in professional activities, but also in active social work. During the tour, M. Zhelkover, like all actors of the theater, actively helped amateur circles with professional advice, conducted conversations on topical topics of that period, for example, about the Constitution of 1937. And in 1940 he joined the ranks of the Bolshevik Party (see: Gaiman, B. 30 years on stage // Birobidzhan Star. 1940. December 29. p. 4).

The fact that Moses Zhelkover was known and loved in Birobidzhan is evidenced by the celebration organized in January 1941 in honor of the thirtieth anniversary of the actor's stage activity.

The gift from the hero of the day was the play "Sender Blank", in which M. Zhelkover played the main role.

The works of Sholom Aleichem have always been an inexhaustible source for the Jewish Soviet theater. "Sender Blank" is one of the first novels of the writer. This truly dramatic work was originally created for the stage. No wonder we read in the subtitle to the chapters of this novel: "The curtain is raised and the comedy begins", "Here begins a real game in which actors can show all their art" (see: Miller B. Sender Blank // Birobidzhan star. 1940. May 5. p. 4).

And indeed, in this performance, the actors had every opportunity to fully reveal themselves. They didn't even have to come up with something of their own. The text of Sholom Aleichem was the best guide for them. Perhaps, therefore, it is difficult and easy to stage this work for any theater, since, on the one hand, this work must be shortened, which inevitably leads to the transformation of the novel into a play, on the other hand, the ease was that even with its reduction, the style of this work was preserved.

In the Birobidzhan dramatization, as the journalists of the Birobidzhan Star newspaper wrote, it could be seen that the director retained only the plotline of the novel. And the actors playing the main roles had to rely more on the broad characteristics given to the roles by the author. These are, first of all, Sender Blank, Rebekah, Osip Zemlya, to a lesser extent, Sender's wife Mia-Hai, Sonya, Mark.

In the center of the play is the greedy, rude rich man Sender Blank, whom Sholom Aleichem showed in all his guise back in the last century and managed to expose him with his scathing satirical word, thereby expressing the deepest popular hatred. The main character is surrounded by members of his family, they are closely connected with him. But these are not ties of kinship, family friendship – this is just an empty phrase, the only thing that connects them is money, the inheritance of Sender Blank. The dramatic action finds an appropriate balance in the production in that, in parallel with the environment of Sendar and his family, another environment is shown – the servants of Froika and the people of the kitchen. These two forces are opposed to each other.

The production of this performance was carried out by director M. I. Friedman. Like M. Zhelkover, Mikhail Fridman has worked in the theater since its foundation. The advantage of his directorial work in this play was that the action was not overloaded with any director's inventions. It really was a realistic performance, during which the viewer was completely captured by the action taking place on stage.

The main role in the play was played by the hero of the day and it was especially successful for him. In the image of Sender Blank, M. Zhelkover embodied natural colors for a realistic image of a rich man, whose motto is "Take care of the ruble, and you will be a man." He is a typical ruble man who, even on his deathbed, does not forget to ask the servant for 2 rubles. 40 kopecks. change. At the same time, in this role, the artist was able to avoid the slightest caricature, and it was in his natural game, journalists wrote, "this gorged bourgeois appears in all his ugliness as a hero of that era and of that society where such scenes were possible," about which Sholom Aleichem wrote in the novel "May God give more cheerful and more pleasant scenes in our lives" (see: Miller B. Sender Blank // Birobidzhan star. 1940. May 5. p. 4).

On December 29, 1940, the play was staged with the participation of the hero of the day in the title role. The audience warmly and cordially welcomed the actor's appearance on stage. After the second act, the celebration of the hero of the day took place. "He was welcomed by the commissioner of the Committee for Arts Affairs at the Regional Executive Committee of the EAO, Comrade. Gofung and Comrade. Etin – from the regional and city party organizations, Comrade. Sarashevsky from the regional executive committee, Comrade. Krasilnikova – from the Committee for Arts Affairs at the Regional Executive Committee and the All–Russian Theater Society, B. Miller - from the Birobidzhan Group of Writers, Comrade. Kolina – from the theater team" (Relimin B. Jubilee of actor M. Zhelkovera // Birobidzhan star. 1941. January 3. p. 4). The speakers congratulated M. Zhelkovera, presented addresses and gifts. In addition, the decision of the executive committee of the regional council of Workers' Deputies was announced at the evening on awarding M. Zhelkover with a diploma of the regional executive committee and awarding him a two-month salary, as well as providing him with a new apartment, which naturally testified to the recognition of the actor's merits to the Jewish autonomous region (Relimin B. Jubilee of actor M. Zhelkover // Birobidzhan Star. 1941. January 3. p. 4).

In addition, welcome telegrams from theater groups of artists and writers from Moscow, Odessa, Kiev, Minsk and other cities where Jewish theaters were located were read out at the evening. In the final part of the evening, the hero of the day made a speech in response. He warmly thanked the public of the region for the honor and promised to justify it in further work (Relimin B. Anniversary of actor M. Zhelkovera // Birobidzhan star. 1941. January 3. p. 4).

1. The actor kept this promise. The period 1941-1945 was difficult for the entire Soviet country. In the conditions of the outbreak of the Great Patriotic War, some theater groups were closed. For example, the Russian troupe that existed at the Kaganovich Jewish State Theater was liquidated. But the theater itself continued its work. In the new conditions, literary works dedicated to the exploits of the people during the war appeared. One of these works is the play by the Birobidzhan writer G. Rabinkov "In the Mountains of Crimea", in which the author revealed the theme of the struggle of the Jewish people against fascism. It was this play that the staff of the Jewish theater decided to stage in 1943, one of the roles in which (the head of the partisan detachment) was played by M. Zhelkover. The plot of the play is simple: ordinary people of different nationalities live on the territory of Crimea, they live together. However, the war begins, young people go to the front, women and old people work for the front, but the enemy is close, and the Jews go to the mountains, organize a partisan detachment and begin to actively fight the occupiers. The play was distinguished by the colorfulness of many figures created by the author, the individualized language of the characters, the skillful use of humor, which helps in places to defuse the heavy, oppressive atmosphere of the mortal danger hanging over the characters. Director Ya.I. Rosenfeld faced a difficult task – to create the first play about the participation of Jews in the battles for the Motherland, while revealing the national identity of the characters of the participants in this struggle, to create a Jewish national play about the Patriotic War. And the director, according to journalists, succeeded, which was naturally facilitated by the successful performance of the actors, including the image of the head of the Daikhes partisan detachment, played by M. Zhelkover. He managed to create a convincing external drawing of the role. Although the journalists of the Birobidzhan Zvezda newspaper wrote, the artist M. Zhelkover did not fully use his capabilities. So, for example, the question remained unclear in the course of the performance, by virtue of which internal qualities he, and not anyone else, is the head of the partisan detachment. Under the well-portrayed external calmness, the actor lacked the inner excitement that could captivate the viewer, make them believe in the power of his inner image (Ritter D. In the mountains of Crimea // Birobidzhan star. 1943. June 29. p. 3).

The performance itself, despite its shortcomings, was warmly received by the audience, as well as other performances staged by the team during these years, such as "Poor, but fun", "Life Lesson".

The Jewish band met the end of the Great Patriotic War on tour in Kazakhstan. Upon his return, the theater continued its work, actor Moses Zhelkover still worked in its team. During the period 1945-1949, the artist played in many new productions: "The Island of Peace" (E. Petrov), "Red Tie" (S. Mikhalkov), "Moscow Character" (A. Safronov), as well as in the newly included in the repertoire – "Uprising in the Ghetto" (P. Markish), "200,000" (Sholom Aleichem).

However, in the late 1940s, the national policy of the Soviet state towards the Jewish people changed. As a result, the closure of Jewish state theaters begins in the USSR (State Archive of the Jewish Autonomous Region (GAEAO). F. 1-P. Op. 1. d. 296. L.5).

So, on October 22, 1949, the decree of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR No. 2835 "On the liquidation of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after Kaganovich." In December 1949, in the courtyard of the regional library named after The works of repressed Jewish writers were destroyed by Sholom Aleichem: D. Bergelson, L. Kvitko, D. Hofstein, P. Markish. At the same time, other documents telling about the creation of a unique territorial unit – the Jewish Autonomous Region (GAEAO. F. 148. Op. 1. d. 20. l. 3; 7) were destroyed.

Conclusion

After the closure of the theater, the fate of many actors and directors ended tragically. Many prominent figures of Birobidzhan – writers, poets, actors, journalists were arrested. For example, M. Zhelkovera's colleague, Fayvish Lvovich Arones, was subjected to repression. At the same time, some theater actors, such as E. L. Gelfand, I.M. Kolin (Gross), were able to leave the Far East and work in other creative teams of the country. Their path has already been the subject of our research in separate articles [19; 20].

But it was not possible to find out how the life of Moses Zhelkover turned out after the closure of the Jewish theater, as well as information that he was subjected to repression. The archival materials of the foundation 148 of the State Archive of the EAO reflect the history of the L. Kaganovich Jewish State Theater, and it mentions only the lists of theater employees. Their biography can be recreated only by contacting the regional press, the materials of which we used in this work. However, information about the actors and directors of the Birobidzhan theater can be found in the personal funds of the archive, permission to work with which can only be obtained with the consent of the actor's remaining relatives. It is the further search for the actor's relatives, as well as materials from the memoirs of his colleagues, to clarify certain facts of his biography, as well as to analyze his activities after the liquidation of BIRGOSET, that is a promising project for our further scientific work.

Thus, the life of Moses Zhelkover, who worked for 15 years at the Jewish State Theater in Birobidzhan, linking his fate with the EAO, shows how unique people lived and worked in the Far East, how they developed their region, their culture. Their biographies reflected the peculiarities of the cultural and national policy of the Soviet state. And through the prism of their work, it is possible to study the actual problems facing the Soviet country during the period under study. This explains the interest in the life and work of people who have contributed to the development of culture, who can become an example for modern youth.

References
1. Melikhov, A.M. (2009). Birobidzhan-the Promised Land. Moscow: Text.
2. Ryansky, F.N., ed. (1992). Jewish Autonomous Region. Birobidzhan: IKARP FEB RAS.
3. Pikalov, Yu.V. (2003). Resettlement policy and changes in the social class composition of the population of the Far East of the RSFSR (November 1922 June 1941). Khabarovsk: KhSPU.
4. Nam, I.V. (2009). National minorities of Siberia and the Far East at a historical turning point. Tomsk: Krlaretinaum.
5. Platunov, N.N. (1976). Resettlement policy of the Soviet state and its implementation in the USSR (1917–1941). Tomsk: Publishing house Tomsk University.
6. Kantor, Y. (1934). National construction among Jews in the USSR. Moscow: OZET.
7. Alberton, M. (2016). Biro-bidzhan. Moscow: Text.
8. Kotlerman, B. (2008). “Yiddishization” of the territory of the JAO: resettlement villages and collective farms on the map of the region. Humanities, 1, 67–72.
9. Kotlerman, B. (2005). On the history of the closure of state Jewish theaters in the USSR: the case of the Birobidzhan GOSET named after. Kaganovich in 1949–1951. In Bulletin of the Jewish University, 10, 144–152.
10. Kotlerman, B. (2014). Positivist romanticism on the Soviet Jewish Stage: Moyshe Goldblat’s New Yiddish Theater (1937–1938). In Aschkenas. [S. l.]: Bar Ilan University, 101–127.
11. Kotleman, B. & Katsman, R. (2014). Around the point: studies in Jewish literature and culture in multiple languages. In Aschkenas. [S. l.]: Bar Ilan University, January, 47–59.
12. Kotlermann, B. (2011). Dreams of Nationhood: American Jewish Communists and the Soviet Birobidzhan Project, 1924–1951 by Henry Felix Srebrnik. In Aschkenas. [S. l.]: Bar Ilan University, 26–38.
13. Kotleman, B. (2009). In Search of milk and honey: the theater of “Soviet Jewish statehood” (1934–1949). In Aschkenas. [S. l.]: Bar Ilan University, P. 68–81.
14. Kotlerman, B. (2009). Jewish Studies in the Far East. In Mizrekh, 39–54. New York: Peter.
15. Gurevich, V.S. (2017). Jewish Autonomous Region: from the history of settlement and administrative-territorial structure. In Regional problems, 2, 79–83.
16. Gurevich, V.S. (2020). Jewish Autonomous Region: from the past to the present. Moscow: Omega-press. (In Russian).
17. Kudish, E.I. (1996). Theatrical Birobidzhan. Birobidzhan.
18. Kashtanyuk, V.A. (2009). Features of the ethnic history of Jews in the Jewish Autonomous Region. Birobidzhan: Publishing House DVGSGA.
19. Gamaley, S.Yu. (2021). F.L. Arones – actor of the Jewish Theater. Kaganovich, Birobidzhan. In Culture and civilization, 11(3-1), 5–12.
20. Gamaley, S.Yu. (2023). The creative life of E. L. Gelfand – actor and director of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after. L. Kaganovich. In News of the Ural Federal University. Series 1. Problems of education, science and culture, 29(3), 89–99.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for review ("The forgotten name of the talented actor of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after L. Kaganovich (Moses Efimovich Zhelkover)") is the creative biography of the actor of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after L. Kaganovich Moses Efimovich Zhelkover (dates of life have not been established), which is reflected in the title. At the intersection of microsociology and the regional history of everyday life, the author boldly chooses the angle of reflection of the cultural and national policy of the Soviet state of the 1920s and 1940s in the biography of the actor. The genre of the biographical essay was chosen by the author to problematize the "white spots" in the history of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater. Kaganovich, which, of course, should represent the sum of events from the lives of people who have contributed to the development of regional theatrical culture. The strength of the chosen genre is the complex reconstruction of the creative biography of Moses Efimovich reflected in epistolary sources. The lack of a promising program for further research is the weak side of the article. While the author has not outlined the prospects for further research, the goal of problematizing the topic cannot be considered achieved. Therefore, the reviewer recommends that the author strengthen the final conclusion: 1) an assessment of the novelty of the achieved result; 2) promising tasks for further research and the tools necessary to solve them (a set of scientific methods). One of the critically important tasks, as follows from the presented material, is to establish the most significant dates of M. E. Zhelkovera's biography: birth and death. To solve such a problem, of course, it is necessary to identify a set of search works: to identify the actor's inner circle (relatives, colleagues, friends) in order to interview the living among them or expand the coverage of archival and other written sources related to the reconstruction of the remaining "white spots", etc. In general, the reviewer can conclude that in order to actualize the problem of restoring the biography of one of the prominent actors of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater. Kaganovich, who worked in the theater from the moment of its organization until 1949, the author revealed the subject of the study at a sufficient level. However, the scientific value of the result is not clear enough. A scientific problem is actualized, as a rule, in order to further solve it with the help of scientific research. In the opinion of the reviewer, this is exactly what the final conclusion in the article should be devoted to. The research methodology is based on the generalization of epistolary sources in order to reconstruct the famous creative biography of the actor of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after L. Kaganovich Moisei Efimovich Zhelkovera based on the historical and biographical method. However, as noted above, the author did not indicate for what purpose the scientific problem of restoring the famous creative biography of the actor was actualized. The author needs to specify in the introduction or in the conclusion the scientific novelty of the result achieved by him (contribution to science) and the prospects for further research, revealed by the fact of the result obtained. The author explains the relevance of the topic by the need to turn to the historical experience of the national and cultural policy of the Soviet state in the 1920s and 1930s, when the Jewish Autonomous Region was created in the Far East as one of the options for solving the Jewish question. At the same time, the author touches on a broader historical period from 1906 to 1949, due to the well-known biography of M. E. Zhelkovera. The reviewer notes that the relevance of such studies at the intersection of microhistory and microsociology is valuable not only in terms of forming scientific ideas about the impact of public policy on the life of an individual, but also in terms of revealing the true subjectivity of the historical process, which is human labor. The scientific novelty of the article submitted for review, consisting in the author's generalization of various epistolary sources, is beyond doubt, but the reviewer notes that an author's assessment of the novelty of the result achieved by him is necessary, on the basis of which a more correct verification is possible. The style of the text as a whole is scientific, although in some judgments the author's correction of the coordination of words in sentences is required (for example, "In 1934, together with the first group of actors, he comes to ...", "In December 1949 in the courtyard of the regional library. Sholom Aleichem burned the works of repressed Jewish writers..."). The structure of the article as a whole reflects the logic of presenting the results of scientific research, but, as noted above, the content of the introduction and conclusion should be methodically strengthened. The bibliography reflects the subject area of research at a minimum level (it does not reflect the author's work with archival sources and the current state of research on the topic in scientific literature over the past 3-5 years); the design requires adjustments taking into account the requirements of the editorial board and GOST (see https://nbpublish.com/e_ca/info_106.html ) The appeal to the opponents is quite correct and sufficient. After a little revision, the article will undoubtedly be of interest to the readership of the magazine "Man and Culture".

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author submitted his article "The forgotten name of the talented actor of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after L. Kaganovich (Moses Efimovich Zhelkover)" to the magazine "Man and Culture", in which a study of the creative biography and destinies of people who stood at the origins of the development of culture of the Soviet Far East was conducted. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that the difficult foreign policy situation that has arisen between the Russian Federation and other previously friendly states may lead to an aggravation of interethnic conflicts. That is why the author considers it necessary to turn to the historical experience of the implementation of national policy by the Soviet state in the 1920s and 1930s, when the Jewish Autonomous Region was established in the Far East as one of the options for solving the Jewish question. The relevance of the research is due to the fact that the biography of creative people reflects the peculiarities of the cultural and national policy of the Soviet state, through the prism of their creativity, it is possible to study the actual problems facing the Soviet country during the period under study. The practical significance of the research lies in the fact that the study of the life and work of people who have contributed to the development of culture can become an example for modern youth. In the course of the research, the author applied general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as biographical and socio-cultural analysis. The empirical base was made up of eyewitness memoirs and materials from the archive of the Jewish Autonomous Okrug and the regional press. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of the Soviet state national policy of the first half of the twentieth century on the life and work of representatives of the Jewish people. Having analyzed the scientific validity of the problem, the author notes a sufficient number of scientific works devoted to the creation of a separate national territorial unit and the development of Jewish culture. However, as the author notes, the scientific discourse does not pay due attention to the people who worked on the stage of the Jewish State Theater (Birobidzhan). As the subject of the study, the author determined the fate of the actor of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater, Moses Efimovich Zhelkover, since the national policy of the Soviet government towards the Jewish people, the creation of the Jewish Autonomous Region was met positively by him, which is why he went to Birobidzhan as part of the first Jewish troupe and worked throughout all the years of the theater's existence, until 1949 on his stage. The author reveals in detail the biography of the actor from the beginning of his career in Poland in 1906 to the liquidation of the Birobidzhan State Jewish Theater named after him. Kaganovich in 1949. The author pays special attention to the political and socio-cultural factors that influenced the creation of the Jewish Autonomous Region and the development of culture on its territory. In conclusion, the author presents a conclusion on the conducted research, which contains all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the influence of the national policy of our country in certain historical periods and its impact on the formation and development of the cultural environment is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The bibliographic list of the research consists of 20 sources, including foreign ones, which seems sufficient for generalization and analysis of scientific discourse. The author fulfilled his goal, obtained certain scientific results that made it possible to summarize the material, showed deep knowledge of the studied issues. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication.