Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Sociodynamics
Reference:

Social management: impact or interaction?

Kremnyov Evgeny Vladimirovich

ORCID: 0000-0001-5255-3772

PhD in Sociology

Head of the Department of Sinology, Research Center for Transdisciplinary Regionology of Asia Pacific, Irkutsk State University; Associate Researcher of the Russian-Chinese Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Sociological Institute of RAS, a Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

664025, Russia, Irkutsk region, Irkutsk, Lenin str., 8, office 316

kremnyov2005@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2023.8.44130

EDN:

YJAVQW

Received:

24-09-2023


Published:

01-10-2023


Abstract: The subject of this paper is the system of social management, in relation to which the author attempts to identify basic strategies for combining different types of links (vertical and horizontal) and relations (impact and interaction) of this system in the context of the growing demand of society for participation in social management. The theoretical and methodological basis for the study of this subject is the concept of E. Mayo and his followers about the social orientation of management and the system-modeling approach. The specificity of the social system is that the effectiveness of each of the identified strategies should be evaluated within the framework of regional conditions in which it is formed. Based on the understanding of social management as a system, the elements of this system, types of links and relations within it are described. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that it describes for the first time the identified strategies of combining these links and relations: horizontal-interacting, vertical-interacting and horizontal-impacting. The results can be used for planning strategies of interaction with different regional systems of social governance of different levels. The article concludes that social governance as a concept has prospects for development, since its basic task is to satisfy the socium's request for joint regulation of social processes.


Keywords:

social management, management system, vertical links, horizontal links, subject of management, object of management, impact, interaction, socio-political system, participativity

This article is automatically translated.

Introduction

Social management as a social phenomenon has become an object of study of socio-humanitarian sciences relatively recently. According to Yu.E. Volkov, this began to happen "as social systems began to take on an increasingly democratic and socially oriented character" [1]. The object of social management as a type of activity L. A. Krivonosova considers the quality of life of the population of the territorial community [2], which indicates the socially-oriented nature of this type of management.

Modern sociologists call E. Mayo one of the founders of the concept of social orientation of management [3], who presented the results of his research in the works "Democracy and Freedom: Essays on Social Logic" [4], "Irrational factor in society" [5], "Human problems of industrial civilization" [6] and "Social problems of Industrial civilizations" [7]. Gradually, within the framework of socio–humanitarian sciences, a new scientific direction is emerging – the science of social management, in other interpretations - the theory of social management.

Being a new concept, social management, especially in Western scientific literature, is often opposed to strategic management, since it acts as an alternative to technoburocratic and monological management; social management tends to participatory and dialogical forms in which the decision-making process is carried out by various social actors [8]. The question is often raised about what role the state can play in the system of social management while increasing the role of society itself in managing social processes [9]. It is often pointed out that there are significant difficulties in institutionalizing this research field due to its multidisciplinarity and multi-paradigm [10], as well as the fact that the entire field of management research is undergoing an ontological and epistemological crisis [11]. In this article, an attempt is made to systematically consider one of the components of this crisis: the transformation of the subject-object understanding of the social understanding of management to the “subject-subject”, which implies an increase in the role of society in management.

 

Theoretical and methodological approaches

The work is based on the concept of E. Mayo and his followers about the social orientation of management. In line with the system modeling approach, the basic elements of the social management system (subject/object), types of connections (vertical/horizontal), types of relationships (impact/interaction) are described through dichotomous relationships. On this theoretical and methodological basis, an attempt is made to identify strategies for combining various types of connections and relationships in the context of a growing demand of citizens to participate in social management.

 

Results and discussion

In the countries of the socialist camp, social management developed for some time in a Marxist way [12, 13, 14]. Post-Soviet theoretical approaches are beginning to develop an updated research paradigm based on the combination of Western and their own approaches. Dobryuk K. I., Dobryuk Ya. K. within the framework of the principle of continuity of scientific knowledge, several stages of the development of the science of social management are distinguished: pre-sociological (from ancient times until the emergence of sociology as a science in the 30-40s of the XIX century.); the development of the science of social management in the subject field of classical sociology (30-40s of the XIX-early XX centuries.); development of the theory and practice of production and production management (late XX-early XX centuries); the emergence and constitution of the sociology of management (20-50s of the XX century); the modern stage of development of the science of social management (2nd half of the XX century-present) [15].

In the modern Russian-language scientific discourse, social management is considered by approaches and methods of various sciences, but the object of research itself assumes a pronounced interdisciplinarity of approaches. Thus, the institutionality of social management is considered, in particular, from an economic and legal point of view [16], the issues of regional social management - on the basis of socio–political, socio-economic and regionological approaches [17, 18], the problem of a complex paradigm of social management - at the intersection of philosophy, economics, political science and other sciences [19] etc .

In post–Soviet sociology, including under the influence of global trends, social management is considered within the framework of at least two multidirectional concepts, which can be divided according to the basic principle - from the point of view of subject-object relations:

1) the concept of vertical impact;

2) the concept of horizontal interaction;

In the first case, the concept of "vertical impact" can be distinguished as a traditional one, inheriting previous approaches to management: it presupposes the existence of such relations of the controlling and controlled subsystems, in which there is a directed impact "from top to bottom" [20, 21].

It can be contrasted with a new concept of "horizontal interaction", in which the position is put forward that "in social management, the object simultaneously acts as its subject, since in both cases we are talking about people and the social organizations they make up" [22]. The latter of these concepts, in turn, substantiates "horizontality" through various phenomena of modern society. Such are, for example, self-organization and self-government inherent in society, the first as a result of self-reflection of social objects generates the second, as a result of which social management can be considered as "the process of creating conditions for self-organization and self-government of social subjects" [23].  Another phenomenon is ubiquitous informatization, which makes it possible to build a "global social management", carried out jointly and on the basis of a dialogue between everyone and everyone [24]. The influence of a new type of mass character on social management is also indicated, which is characterized as an increasing "community of humanity and cardinal changes taking place under the influence of mass social mobility, mass culture and mass communication" [25].

How resolvable is the contradiction between these two concepts? It should be noted that the most relevant trend is attempts to combine these concepts based on the external conditions in which the social management system operates. As a basic condition, the idea is accepted that the number of socially active citizens who want to take part in making important management decisions on a permanent basis increases within the society. These, first of all, include city residents who form their requests to the system on the basis of a high level of education, improving the quality of life, transparency of management processes due to their informatization. In this regard, management systems are looking for opportunities to increase the participation of citizens in social management, for which strategies are being developed for their inclusion, including with the involvement of scientists in the fields of sociology of management, management, political science and other industries. It is assumed that such strategies reduce social tension and contribute to the prevention of citizens' participation in illegal forms of social activity. However, the external conditions for the functioning of such new social management systems can be very different, which affects the form and content of these strategies. If we take as a basis two basic features (horizontal/vertical orientation and the influencing/interacting type of relations), we can choose at least three strategies that should be considered in conjunction with the basic external condition (the type of socio-political system of the state in which the social management system is being built):

1) horizontal-interacting strategies (liberal-democratic);

2) vertically interacting strategies (autocratic);

3) horizontally-acting (hybrid).

The fourth type - vertically influencing - we do not take into account, since it refers to traditional, administrative and coercive strategies and is not considered today as progressive or having real prospects, since it does not take into account the increasing demand of citizens to participate in management - this is exactly the request that the social management makes.

As for the strategies of the first type, horizontally interacting, its exhaustive definition can be found in D. H. S. Oliveira, who understands social management as a new area of managerial knowledge and practices, the key aspects of which are social participation and collective decision-making based on the principles of ethics and solidarity, oriented towards the social as a result and as a process [26]. It is obvious that such a strategy can be openly discussed only within the framework of a relatively structured system of liberal democratic norms.

The second type, vertically interacting, is the result of building a social management system in autocratic systems, where state bodies are the only decision-making actor, but at the same time they are aware of the citizens' request to participate in social management. An example of the implementation of such strategies is mainland China [27], where such a system is actively implemented through the distribution of powers between the “top” and “bottom” [28]: the higher the level of management, the more general powers the corresponding actor has [29]. In other words, party-state bodies develop the foundations of a political and economic course, regional leaders are responsible for the development of their territories, public organizations are engaged in the relevant spheres of social life, residents of urban communities determine the material, social and cultural conditions in which their community will exist, etc. [30] At the same time, higher authorities retain the right to final solutions [31], which makes this system vertically interacting.

The third type of horizontal-acting strategies assumes that a rough idea of the hierarchy of management does not give an idea of the real picture of social management, which is a vertical system only formally, but in fact management actors at all levels actively influence each other to achieve their own goals. In such approaches, the hierarchy is not displayed in the first place, but is only one of the elements.

In particular, N. L. Zakharov believes that "congruence of forms of management at the "lower" and "higher" levels ensures more successful (effective) development of social systems, their further complication and increase of their potential... the spread of priority management methods, as a rule, comes from the “bottom”, from the primary communities, evolutionarily transforming the “tops". An attempt to introduce priority management “from above” causes conservative resistance from the “grassroots”. In this case, the management coming from "above" turns out to be unable to integrate society as a whole" [32].

One of the methodological solutions to the problem of combining “horizontal” and “influencing” management characteristics can be seen in the work of I. V. Kalashnikova and K. V. Filippova, who propose to divide social management into a type of activity and a mechanism of influence. In this case, as a type of activity, it is a kind of "professional management activity aimed at harmonizing social processes in society, large and small social groups and aimed at achieving goals involving the coordination of joint actions", and as a mechanism of influence, it is "a set of technologies, management tools with which conscious, systematic, systematic and purposeful impact" [33].

Another approach to this problem is fixed in the work of E. Yu . Rusyaeva, who suggests considering the management of social systems not through the prism of “top/bottom” or “subject/object", but through taking into account factors of a “general/private" nature. She refers to such factors:

system-forming (basic, formed and fixed in the program);

goal-functional (indicating management goals and functions);

functional and structural (including functions and composition, organization structure, distribution of power in the management system);

behavioral (taking into account the psychological characteristics of individuals) [34].

These are the three types of basic strategies we have fixed for combining vertical and horizontal in social management.

 

Conclusion

Based on the system modeling approach, three types of key strategies for combining various types of connections and relationships in the social management system are identified: horizontally interacting strategies, vertically interacting and horizontally influencing. These strategies are largely tied to the socio-political systems that determine the formation of these strategies: the first arise and are implemented in the conditions of liberal democratic regimes, the second - autocratic, the third - hybrid. The effectiveness of each of the strategies can and should be evaluated within these specified conditions.

It seems that social management as a concept has a high viability in the foreseeable future, since it is aimed at satisfying the social demand for participation in managerial decision-making. Further research in this area can be aimed at identifying other factors in the formation of social management models, due not only to the socio-political system, but also, in particular, region-specific management practices.

References
1. Volkov, Yu. E. (2005). The essence of social management. Sociology of Power, 3, 3-24.
2. Krivonosova, L. A. (2005). Object of social management – quality of life of the population of the territorial community. Sociology of Power, 1, 155-164.
3. Savkina, E.G. (2003). Social and administrative theory of Elton Mayo. Author's abstract of dissertation of Candidate of Sociology. Moscow: Kazan State Technological University.
4. Mayo, G. E. (1919). Democracy and freedom: an essay in social logic. Melbourne: A.H. Massina & Co.
5. Mayo, G. E. (1923). The Irrational Factor in Society. Journal of Personnel Research, 1(10), 419-426.
6. Mayo, G. E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.
7. Mayo, G. E. (1945). The social problems of an industrial civilization. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
8. Tenório, F. G. (1998). Gestão social: uma perspectiva conceitual. Revista de Administração Pública, 32(5), 7-23.
9. Reddel, T. (2004). Third Way Social Governance: Where is the State. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 129-142.
10. Cançado, A. C., Pereira J. R., Tenório F. G., & Vilas Boas A. A. (2015). Social management beyond procrustes' bed: Ontological, Epistemological and Methodological Considerations. Business and Management Review, 4(5), 208-222.
11. Fleetwood, S. (2005). Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization, 12(2), 197-222.
12. Osnovin, B.C. (1971). Fundamentals of the Science of Social Management. Voronezh: Voronezh University Press.
13. Bakhrakh, D.N. (1978). Basic concepts of the theory of social management. Perm: PSU.
14. Markov, M. (1978). Theory of Social Management. Moscow: Progress.
15. Dobryuk, K. I., & Dobryuk Ya. K. (2006). The main stages of formation of the science of social management. Vologda Readings, 59, 22-27.
16. Beketov, N.V. (2008). Institutionalization of social management (in Russian). Digest-finance, 4(160), 56-60.
17. Afonin, Y. A., Orlova L. V. (2017). Social security – social state – social governance. Sciences of Europe, 13-2(13), 50-59.
18. Chernyshova, L. D. (2006). Social governance in the region. Sociology of Power, 6, 2-15.
19. Ovcharov, A. O., & Ovcharova T. N. (2017). Complex paradigm of social management. Politics and Society, 8, 130-143.
20. Babosov, E. M. (2003). Social management. Sociology: an encyclopedia. A. A. Gritsanov, V. L. Abushenko, G. M. Evelkin, G. N., & Sokolova, O. V. Tereshchenko (Eds.). Minsk: Interpresservice; Book House.
21. Social Management. (1999). Russian Sociological Encyclopedia. G.V. Osipov (ed.). Moscow: NORMA-INFRA M Publishing Group.
22. Stoyanov, A. S. (2005). The essence and structure of social management in the main spheres of modern Russian society (dynamics of change and prospects of development). Author's abstract of dissertation of Candidate of Sociology. Moscow: M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
23. Shabrova L. K. (2008). Self-organization and social managemen. Bulletin of the Volga State Academy of Water Transport, 24, 45-46.
24. Orlanov, G. B. (2010). Social management and sociology of power (in Russian). Sociology of power, 7, 158-166.
25. Antoshkin, V. N. (2012). Social laws and social management. Vestnik of Bashkir University, 17(1), 594-597.
26. Oliveira, D. J. S. (2021). Social Management: Epistemology Beyond Paradigms. Organizações & Sociedade, 28(98), 582-606.
27. Li, Xueju (2005). Strengthening social construction and management, promoting social harmony and development. Seeking truth, 7, 16-19.
28. Dou, Yupei (2005). Social Management and Social Harmony. Beijing: China Society Press.
29. Lyu, Zhikui, & Hu, Weiwei (2005). Countermeasures for Strengthening the Social Management Function of China's Government. The Fourth Research Report on the Subject of "Social Management of the Government". Southeast Academic, 4, 30.
30. Sheng, Meijuan (2008). Research on China's social transformation and innovation of social management. Lanzhou Journal, 12, 77-80.
31. Li, Junpeng (2005). On the Achievements, Problems and Countermeasures of the Chinese Government's Social Management. Journal of Hubei Administrative College, 1.
32. Zakharov, N. L. (2000). Specifics of the social system of Russia. Izhevsk: Udmurt State University Press.
33. Kalashnikova, I.V., & Filippova K.V. (2020). Social management, social management: concepts and interpretations. Bulletin of the Pacific State University, 1(56), 65-70.
34. Rusyaeva, E. Yu. (2008). Cultural bases for the analysis of social and organizational systems management. Management of large-scale systems development MLSD'2008: Proceedings of the second international conference (Moscow, October 1-3, 2008). Volume II. Moscow: Russian Academy of Science, 224-226.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Already in the era of antiquity, the study of socio-political processes became the subject of attention of such philosophers as Plato and Aristotle. "The State", "Critias, or about Atlantis", "Politics" are still interesting today with the reviews expressed in them over 2 thousand years ago. However, the complication of social systems in the 19th century led to the emergence of management sociology, which develops "concepts of the management process as a special type of social interaction with stable and regular forms." The increased attention to the sociology of management is also characteristic of our time. These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which "is the combination of various types of relationships and relationships in the social management system." The author aims to show various approaches to the sociology of management, as well as to analyze the types of basic strategies for combining vertical and horizontal in social management. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is a systematic approach, which is based on the consideration of the object as an integral complex of interrelated elements. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author seeks to characterize strategies for combining various types of connections and relationships in the context of a growing demand from citizens to participate in social management. Considering the bibliographic list of the article, its scale and versatility should be noted as a positive point: in total, the list of references includes over 30 different sources and studies, which in itself shows the amount of preparatory work that its author has done. The undoubted advantage of the reviewed article is the attraction of foreign literature, including in English and Chinese. Among the works attracted by the author, we note the works of E. Mayo, Y.E. Volkov, L.A. Krivonosova, M. Markova, whose focus is on various aspects of the sociology of management. Let us add that the bibliography is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text of the article, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to a scientific one, at the same time understandable not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to anyone interested in both the sociology of management in general and the concepts of vertical and horizontal interaction in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. At the beginning, the author defines the relevance of the topic, shows that "social management, especially in Western scientific literature, is often opposed to strategic management, since it acts as an alternative to technobureocratic and monological management." Within the framework of the study, the author identifies "three types of key strategies for combining various types of connections and relationships in the social management system: horizontally interacting strategies, vertically interacting and horizontally influencing." At the same time, as noted in the reviewed article, "the first arise and are carried out in conditions of liberal democratic regimes, the second - autocratic, the third - hybrid." The author also indicates the prospects for further research aimed at "identifying other factors in the formation of social management models, determined not only by the socio-political system, but also, in particular, by region-specific management practices." The main conclusion of the article is that "social management as a concept has high viability in the foreseeable future, since it is aimed at satisfying the social demand for participation in managerial decision-making." The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, will arouse readers' interest, and its materials can be used both in training courses and in the framework of new research on the sociology of management. In general, in our opinion, the article can be recommended for publication in the journal Sociodynamics.