Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Features of Corruption in Commercial Organizations: The Criminological Aspect

Kostrykina Viktoriya Vital'evna

Assistant of the Department of Delectology and Criminology of the Siberian Federal University

660075, Russia, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, Maerchaka str., 6

v.kostrykina@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2023.3.43800.2

EDN:

UVOSMA

Received:

11-08-2022


Published:

23-08-2023


Abstract: The subject of this study is the provision of the current national legislation regulating legal relations in organizations, generally recognized principles and norms of international law in the field of combating corruption, the provision of the current anti-corruption legislation and other by-laws of the Russian Federation, norms establishing legal responsibility for corruption offenses in organizations, scientific works on these issues, information from the media, and judicial practice. Dialectical, system-structural, formal-logical, and other scientific research methods were used in this work. The study aims to substantiate corruption in commercial organizations as an independent criminological system/structural phenomenon. Organizations carry out their activities in various spheres of society, be it social, economic, political, spiritual, and others. Corruption in commercial organizations is a great public danger, as it encroaches on the everyday activities of commercial organizations and the interests of the state, society, and individual citizens. In the scientific literature, a significant number of scientific papers are devoted to various aspects of corruption in this area. At the same time, the question of the socio-legal characteristics of this type of corruption for the domestic legal doctrine remains open today. The article discusses the main signs of corruption in commercial organizations and its features.


Keywords:

negative consequences, bribery, criminological characteristics, commercial bribery, subjects, purposes, sphere, commercial organizations, business, corruption

Corruption is a significant systemic problem for many states, as it leads to a slowdown in their sustainable development. At a national level, corruption has penetrated almost all spheres of society, including education, healthcare, state and municipal procurement, business activities, etc. Corruption in commercial organizations is no exception.

This negative phenomenon poses a serious social danger, as it encroaches both on the everyday activities of commercial organizations themselves and the interests of the state, society, and individual citizens [1, p. 153]. According to Y. V. Truntsevsky, the negative consequences of corruption in private business should include a reduction of corporate reputation, financial losses, the destruction caused by the regulatory authority or the law, and loss of human resources [2]. According to E. A. Ivanova, Y. P. Garmaeva, and S. A. Markuntsova, "Corruption kills citizens' trust in public authorities, stimulates doing business in the shadow sector and tax evasion" [3, p. 109]. According to A.V. Shashkova, "Corporate corruption leads to negative consequences both at the level of macroeconomics of an individual state and at the level of its microeconomics: an elementary rise in the price of a product leads to an increase in social dissatisfaction of society, which, not finding a solution at its level, spreads to other levels" [4]. Corruption in commercial organizations distorts the competition of market entities, violates natural pricing, distorts the country's taxation system, disorganizes the mechanism of financial state support, destroys investment attractiveness, worsens innovation activity, generates and develops organized crime, shadow economy, raider seizures, illegal privatization of enterprises, etc. [5].

In the scientific literature, various aspects of corruption in the field under consideration have devoted their works to E. Yu. Antonova [6; 7], V. V. Astanin [8–10], B. V. Volzhenkin [11; 12], G. S. Goncharenko [13], A. S. Gorelik [14; 15], N. A. Egorova [16], S. V. Izosimov [17], O. S. Kapinus [18], M. K. Karandyshev [19], S. D. Krasnousov [20], N. A. Lopashenko [21; 22], S. D. Makarov [23], T. A. Nekrasova [24; 25], V. A. Nomokonov [26; 27], S. Yu. Suikov [28], Yu. V. Truntsevsky [29–31], L. P. Tumarkina [32], D. R. Fedoriv and M. L. Gachava [33], T. Ya. Khabrieva [29], G. N. Khlupina [1], A. M. Tsirin [29; 34; 35], E. S. Shalygina [36], E. S. Shimshilova [37], I. V. Shishko [1; 38], A.M. Shunaev [39], P. S. Yani [40; 41], et al.

The analysis of the conducted research has revealed the main approaches to understanding the features of corruption in commercial organizations, which reflect its various aspects and ways to prevent it. Meanwhile, the question of the socio-legal characteristics of corruption in commercial organizations remains open today.

Corruption in commercial organizations is a kind of generic socio-legal phenomenon. In turn, this type of corruption has its own characteristic features, which are revealed in the features of the sphere of existence, the subject composition, as well as the purpose of corrupt behavior [42, p. 121].

In the sphere of the existence of corruption in commercial organizations, there are both internal management activities of commercial organizations, and external activities of a commercial organization carried out in conjunction with other business entities, including representatives of the public sector.

Most commercial organizations have a general legal capacity, that is, the ability to have civil rights and bear the civil duties necessary to carry out any activities not prohibited by law. One of a commercial organization's main activities is entrepreneurial activity, which is to extract profit [43]. In the scientific literature, such categories as "business corruption" is mainly used to denote corruption manifestations in entrepreneurial activity. In reference sources, "business corruption" is defined as "internal corrupt behavior in commercial organizations that do not go beyond the redistribution of an economic entity" [44], and "business corruption" is defined as "the provision of property benefits to state or municipal employees by entrepreneurs on their business affairs" [45]. According to the researchers, "business corruption occurs when one of the subjects of corruption relations is necessarily a representative of a business, an entrepreneur, and the other party can alternatively be a representative of the government, an official or an employee of a business structure or a citizen" [46]. In this case, business corruption is contrasted with everyday corruption, in which ordinary citizens are forced to get involved [47, p. 6]. The situation in which corruption relations arise between business entities and authorities is referred to in the literature as "state-commercial corruption" [44, p. 96].

The concept of "corporate corruption" can also be found in the scientific literature. According to N. A. Podolny and N. N. Podolnaya, the sphere of existence of this type of corruption is "the sphere of corporate relations, that is, relations that arise and unfold in the economy. However, this is not all relations in the economic sphere, as a corporation is a self-governing association of individuals, and therefore the relations that arise in connection with the participation of corporations in them do not cover the entire sphere of the economy" [48, p. 523]. It seems that the content of the concepts of "corruption in commercial organizations" and "corporate corruption" have some similarities, but they are not identical, as in accordance with Part 1 of Article 65.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, corporate legal entities include both commercial (business partnerships and societies, peasant [farmer] farms, business partnerships, production, and consumer cooperatives), as well as non-profit organizations (public organizations, social movements, associations [unions], notary chambers, real estate owners' associations, Cossack societies, etc.). At the same time, state and municipal enterprises that are commercial organizations belong to unitary legal entities [49, p. 321].

As the researchers note, there is often a conflict of interest between top managers and the organizations themselves in commercial organizations. At the same time, the beneficiaries of organizations experience negative consequences from manifestations of corruption on the part of persons performing managerial functions to a greater extent than ordinary employees [50, p. 14]. According to T. Y. Khabrieva, "The most common corrupt practices on the part of commercial organizations are manifested in the acceptance of non-existent services and works not done in reality, the creation of an uncompetitive environment during procurement; the use of cheaper materials during construction than was indicated in the estimate for the preparation of a construction contract and, accordingly, paid for by the customer; the initial overestimation of the cost of works and services provided by an organization where the person making the purchase decision has a vested interest" [zm1] [50, p. 20].

At the same time, other types of activities of commercial organizations should include, for example, their participation in charity. Charitable activities can be implemented in the form of sending gratuitous donations by the organization at an international level from a centralized fund; making special contributions by local companies to organize charity meetings or events; collecting funds exclusively among employees of organizations or clients (for example, to provide assistance to the local population affected by flooding), etc. According to Y. V. Truntsevsky, "in some cases, such noble donations can be used exclusively as "veiled" corrupt payments from an organization to a bribed person" [2] for the purpose of subsequent illegal receipt of both material (obtaining licenses, certificates, permits, preferential lending programs, tax evasion, etc.) and intangible benefits (obtaining immunity from various kinds of inspections by authorized persons, expanding business opportunities, getting to know influential people, entering the circle of trusted persons with whom the authorities are ready to conduct business negotiations on more friendly terms on the part of bribed persons). Some researchers believe that in the modern world, it is difficult to meet a person "who would sacrifice his funds out of personal profit and without the intention to extract much greater dividends from such a donation" [51].

One of the criminologically significant aspects of the activities of commercial organizations is their participation in the illegal financing of political activities (election campaigns [52–54], lobbying activities [55]), the purpose of which is also to obtain tangible and intangible benefits. In the scientific literature, this phenomenon is called political corruption [56; 57]. In modern reality, generous donations to election funds received from commercial organizations represent a reward for the subsequent lobbying of their interests by elected officials, which can lead to a decrease in the level of legitimacy of representative government, determination of politicization of organized crime, distortion of real political competition, loss of public confidence in the process of power formation through elections, penetration into power by individuals. With a criminal past, the seizure of power by businessmen not only in a particular region but also in the state as a whole, the creation of an undesirable image of the country, violation of the principle of legality, etc. [58, p. 211]. As E. I. Kolyushin correctly noted in this regard, "The interest of commercial organizations in the election results is explained from the point of view of the possibility of obtaining additional profit (or not suffering losses)" [59, pp. 255–256].

The next characteristic feature of corruption in commercial organizations is the list of its subjects. The range of subjects of corruption relations in commercial organizations is diverse. In the scientific literature, it is traditionally accepted to distinguish two types of subjects of corruption relations: passive bribery and active bribery [54, p. 34–35; 60, p. 711; 61, p. 29–30]. The presented classification applies to the characteristics of corruption in commercial organizations.

Subjects of passive bribery in commercial organizations are participants in the sphere of activity of a commercial organization (a sane individual who has reached a certain age of criminal responsibility or a legal entity) who use their status or official position contrary to the legitimate interests of organizations, society, and the state to extract property and (or) non–property benefits for themselves or third parties.

The main subjects of passive bribery in commercial organizations include officials, persons performing managerial functions in a commercial organization, and commercial organizations themselves.

In the scientific literature, a proposal is made to classify subjects of passive bribery and persons working in relevant commercial organizations in different capacities (for example, a manager, consultant, engineer, or specialist). At the same time, it should be emphasized that in accordance with the current legislation, the criminal legal qualification of corrupt acts of the latter categories of persons is very difficult. According to T. A. Nekrasova, "the initiators and conductors of corruption manifestations are, as a rule, middle managers. Naturally, such manifestations occur without the knowledge of managers who perform the entrusted powers of the beneficiary" [25, p. 26]. Sharing this position, the researchers emphasize that "these corruption schemes are outside the scope of criminal law, but at the same time do not lose the criminological properties of everyday corruption; rather, on the contrary, they provide its high latency and form the resource basis of criminally punishable corruption. However, the absence of signs of a special subject does not allow to qualify such acts as receiving a bribe or commercial bribery, and the absence of signs of deception does not give grounds for imputing the composition of fraud" [62].

In this regard, we could agree with the opinion of N. A. Lopashenko, who also includes employees of commercial organizations who are not officials and persons performing managerial functions among the subjects of passive bribery [63; p. 100]. This approach fully complies with the provisions of the UN Convention against Corruption and the Council of Europe Convention on Criminal Liability for Corruption.

The subject of active bribery in commercial organizations is an individual sane person who has reached the age of criminal responsibility and legal entities promising or providing remuneration to the subject of passive bribery, as well as mediating in bribery [64]. The subjects of active bribery can be persons with a special official position (status) and those without it.

It should be noted that for some participants in corruption relations in commercial organizations, a combination of statuses is characteristic. Thus, a person performing managerial functions in a commercial organization can act as a subject of passive and active bribery. In the first case, the general director of a commercial organization, being the subject of passive bribery, may receive illegal remuneration from an interested person for committing certain inaction in favor of the latter (for example, a representative of a commercial organization may carry out commercial bribery of the general director of a competing firm so that he does not participate in certain competitive procedures). In the second case, the Director General, acting as the subject of active bribery, may, on behalf of and in the interests of their organization, transfer illegal remuneration to the head of an urban settlement for granting certain municipal preferences.

The public danger and the variety of corruption manifestations in commercial organizations cause the appearance in the scientific and practical environment of proposals to bring to criminal responsibility not only individual but also collective subjects of corruption in commercial organizations. We are talking about the impossibility of bringing legal entities to criminal responsibility, as in the current legislation, criminal liability is established only for a sane individual who has reached a certain age of criminal responsibility (the principle of personal responsibility of the guilty).

Currently, the liability of legal entities for corruption offenses is established at the level of administrative legislation (for example, Articles 19.28 and 19.29 of the Administrative Code). Meanwhile, a reasonable opinion has been expressed in the scientific literature that quasi-criminal liability has been established concerning legal entities that have committed acts of corruption, considered as "the application of administrative and legal measures of influence for acts declared a crime by the legislator" [65, p. 121]. In practice, administrative corruption offenses are initiated exclusively based on the materials of the criminal case. At the same time, bringing an official or a person performing managerial functions in a commercial or other organization to criminal responsibility for bribery or illegal transfer of the subject of commercial bribery does not exempt the legal entity from liability on whose behalf or in whose interests the relevant corruption actions were committed [66]. Judges, as a rule, "do not take into account the arguments of representatives of a legal entity that an individual who gave a bribe to an official acted on their own behalf and in their own interest" [67, p. 85].

On the other hand, it is not uncommon for a commercial organization whose managers or employees were brought to criminal responsibility to continue committing corruption crimes but are already under the leadership of other employees of the organization. Accordingly, the existing system of legal protection of public relations in the area under consideration does not perform its preventive functions. In this connection, it seems reasonable to suspend or terminate the activities of such organizations following the procedure established by law [68, p. 684]. In addition, other authors should be supported, justifying the need to introduce the institution of criminal liability of legal entities for committing acts of corruption, following the example of many foreign countries [69–71; 72, p. 60; 73; 74]. As noted by E. Yu. Antonova, "World practice demonstrates many examples that the subjects of corruption crimes are not only individuals but also corporate (collective) entities. Corporations very often provide illegal rewards to high-ranking officials, for example, for the opportunity to get a large contract and a concession" [6, p. 193]. According to A.V. Naumova's fair remark, "The market and market relations will almost inevitably lead us to the establishment of criminal liability of corporations for economic crimes" [75, p. 109].

The next essential feature of corruption in commercial organizations is the corruption goal. It should be noted that the corruption goal pursued by the subjects of corporate relations is to obtain benefits of both material and (or) non-material nature. Moreover, the subjects of active and passive bribery in commercial organizations are characterized by the desire to extract benefits and advantages of various kinds.

Thus, the head of a commercial organization, in some cases being the subject of active bribery, may commit a corruption offense to illegally obtain a license to conduct business or the right to a long-term lease of real estate, evade cargo transportation payments, overcome bureaucratic delays in interaction with state authorities, avoid inspections by regulatory authorities, exclude the organization from the register of unscrupulous persons, termination of criminal and administrative cases against their organization and (or) its employee, etc. In relations with state authorities and local self-government bodies, the head of a commercial organization may transfer illegal remuneration to a representative of the authorities for granting certain preferences. So, the ex-head of Sakhalin, H, received $5.6 million in kickbacks from the co-owner of the Sakhalin company "Energostroy," K, for the right to receive a contract for the construction of the fourth power unit of the Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk CHP. After H was sentenced to 13 years in prison [76]. The case of the colonel of the Federal Security Service for the Samara region, G, who received illegal remuneration from the head of the legal service of LLC ‘Intersectoral Association ‘TNP’ for failure to take measures" in the case of violations in the activities of this oil company, is also interesting. The total amount of the received bribery funds exceeded 100 million rubles. The court sentenced the FSB Colonel G to 20 years in prison [77].

Intermediaries, agents, or clients of a commercial organization, acting as subjects of active bribery, can offer remuneration to an employee of a commercial organization both for legitimate activities (for example, for faster provision of services or faster shipment of goods) and for illegal ones (for example, for violating the terms of purchase, selling goods to persons who do not have the right to buy them, and so, the director of the CHU PO "Belevsky Cooperative Technical School," O, received an illegal reward in the amount of 100 thousand rubles for illegally providing citizen X. with an education diploma specializing in "Jurisprudence" without actually teaching the latter. O's actions were qualified according to clause "b" of Part 7 of Article 204 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. A penalty was imposed in the form of a fine of 1 million rubles with deprivation of the right to engage in activities related to managerial functions for a period of two years [78].

Within the framework of intra-corporate relations, persons performing managerial functions in commercial organizations, being subjects of passive bribery, may accept illegal remuneration for failure to notify responsible persons of the theft, misappropriation of property, other misuses of company assets, etc., that have become known to them. In other cases, in relation to external economic entities, the heads of commercial organizations may use their official position (status) to obtain illegal remuneration based on self-interest. So, between the Department for Life Support of the city district of the Republic of Bashkortostan (customer) in the person of the head of Department P, and LLC "Construction Management-820" (general contractor) in the person of Director V, a municipal contract was concluded for the performance of works by the general contractor organization under the address program "Overhaul and repair of courtyards of apartment buildings, driveways to yard territories of apartment buildings of the city district of the Republic of Bashkortostan" with a contract price in the amount of 109,461,077 rubles. 54 kopecks. Furthermore, between the customer and the General Director of M, CJSC "Transmonolit" (contractor), a municipal contract was concluded to perform the functions of construction control (technical supervision) within the framework of the implementation of this program, where the general contractor was LLC "Construction Management – 820" and a number of other organizations. M, realizing that without signing the acts of acceptance of the completed works (COP-2), the general contractor LLC "Construction Management – 820" will not be able to hand over the completed work to the customer and receive full payment for the work performed, decided to use this circumstance for their own selfish purposes to illegally receive money or securities after M demanded from the director of LLC "Construction Management – 820" to transfer to him an illegal monetary reward in the amount of 1.5% of the price of the municipal contract, but no less than 1,650,000 rubles for performing actions in V’s interests in connection with his official position, namely for signing acts of acceptance of completed works. V initially agreed to this requirement and then reported it to law enforcement agencies.

The court found M guilty of committing a crime under Part 3 of Article 30 and Part 3 of Article 204 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, sentencing him to a fine of sixteen times the amount of commercial bribery in the amount of 26,400,000 rubles in state revenue with deprivation for two years of the right to hold positions related to the performance of managerial functions in public service related to the performance of managerial functions in the service of local self-government bodies, commercial or other organizations [79].

The research has shown that corruption in commercial organizations is a complex and negative socio-legal phenomenon with certain features that distinguish it from other types of corruption. Corruption in commercial organizations disorganizes their normal activities and also causes irreparable harm to the state, society, and individual citizens. In this regard, the study of the essential characteristics of the type of corruption under consideration is important in the development of a set of sufficient measures to prevent corruption in commercial organizations.

References
1. Gorelik, A. S., Shishko, I. V. & Khlupina, G. N. (1998). Crimes in the sphere of economic activity and against the interests of service in commercial and other organizations. Krasnoyarsk: Publishing House of Krasnoyarsk University.
2. Truntsevsky, Yu. V. (2016). Methodology for assessing corruption risk in the private sector (business bribery risk index). Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru
3. Garmaev, Yu. P., Ivanov, E. A. & Markuntsov, S. A. (2020). On the formation of an interdisciplinary concept of anti-corruption compliance in the Russian Federation. Right. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 4, 106–128. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2020.4.106.12
4. Shashkova, A. V. (2013). Legal innovations in combating corporate corruption. State Power and Local Self-Government, 1, 40–43.
5. Kostrykina, V. V. (2022). Negative consequences of corruption in the activities of a commercial organization. Eurasian Law Journal, 3, 384–387.
6. Antonova, E. Yu. (2013). Criminal liability of a corporate (collective) entity for corruption crimes. NB: Issues of Law and Politics, 3, 192–220.
7. Antonova, E. Yu. (2009). Criminal liability of legal entities for corruption offences. Business Security, 2, 14–16.
8. Astanin, V. V. (2014). Implementation of norms against corruption in the private law sphere in modern Russia. Russian Justice, 3, 47–51.
9. Astanin, V. V. (2012). On the development of anti-corruption global policy in the context of the fight against bribery in the private sphere. Russian Justice, 4, 49–51.
10. Astanin, V. V. (2017). On the realities and tasks of corporate anti-corruption compliance. Law Enforcement Monitoring, 3, 4–9.
11. Volzhenkin, B. V. (2000). Official crimes. Moscow: Jurist.
12. Volzhenkin, B. V. (1999). Economic crimes. St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press.
13. Goncharenko, G. S. (2006). Criminological essence of corruption crime. Izvestiya vuzov. North Caucasian region. Social Sciences, 3, 101–105.
14. Gorelik, A. S. (1999). Crimes against the interests of the public service and against the interests of service in commercial and other organizations: a comparative analysis. Legal World, 4, 16–21.
15. Gorelik, A. S. (1999). Criminal liability for commercial bribery. Legal World, 1–2, 16-19.
16. Egorova, N. A. (2001). Criminal liability for bribery of foreign officials in international commercial transactions: Actual problems of criminal law and criminology. Volgograd: VA MIA of Russia.
17. Izosimov, S. V. (2001). Criminal liability for giving and receiving commercial bribery. Investigator, 6, 2–7.
18. Kapinus, O. S. (2015). Modern problems of combating corruption. Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, 3, 3–9.
19. Karandyshev, M. K. (2010). Commercial bribery. Moscow: Book Laboratory.
20. Krasnousov, S. D. (2012). Commercial bribery as a form of corruption in the private sector: concept and counteraction. Krasnoyarsk.
21. Lopashenko, N. A. (2000). The state and problems of combating corruption and crime in the economic sphere. State and Law, 10, 110–113.
22. Lopashenko, N. A. (2000). Commercial bribery: commentary on the law and some problems of qualification. Man and Law at the Turn of the Century, 1, 12–30.
23. Makarov, S. D. (2000). On the theory and practice of qualification of bribery and commercial bribery. Criminal Law, 3, 26–30.
24. Nekrasova, T. A. (2014). Corruption crime in commercial organizations: criminological characteristics and prevention. Moscow.
25. Nekrasova, T. A. (2013). Socio-legal nature and consequences of corruption in the private sphere. Administrative and Municipal Law, 9, 885–892.
26. Nomokonov, V. A. (2020). A corrupt system against Russia. Journal of the Siberian Federal University. Humanities, 10, 1638–1643.
27. Nomokonov, V. A. (2013). Corruption in Russia: social consequences and features of the causes. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 4, 61–67.
28. Suikov, S. Yu. (2017). Administrative and legal aspects of preventing corruption in the non-financial sphere of the Russian economy: on the example of commercial corporate organizations. Moscow.
29. Khabrieva, T. Ya., Kapinus, O. S. & Tsirin, A. M. (Ed.). (2020). Countering corruption in business. Moscow: Jurisprudence Publishing House.
30. Truntsevsky, Yu. V. (2019). Organizations compliance with anti-corruption legislation: practice issues. Journal of Russian Law, 2, 169–182.
31. Truntsevsky, Yu. V. (2016). Modern corporate threats to the financial sector. Legal World, 8, 36–39.
32. Tumarkina, L. P. (2007). Criminal liability for commercial bribery. Moscow.
33. Fedoriv D. R. & Gachava M. L. (2013). Factors determining commercial bribery. Bulletin of the Vladimir Law Institute, 3, 117–119.
34. Tsirin, A. M. (2015). On the issue of overcoming corruption risks in the activities of state-owned companies and corporations. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 6, 1001–1005.
35. Tsirin, A. M. (2017). Criteria for the extension of anti-corruption prohibitions, restrictions and obligations established in relation to state corporations and companies to their subsidiaries. Journal of Russian Law, 12, 174–181.
36. Shalygina, E. S. (2010). Commercial bribery: criminal law and criminological aspects. Chelyabinsk.
37. Shimshilova, E. S. (2019). Corruption-oriented crimes committed in commercial organizations: criminal law and comparative law research. Moscow.
38. Shishko, I. V. (2004). Economic offenses. Issues of legal assessment and liability. St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press.
39. Shunaev, A.M. (2021). Mechanisms to counter the corruption threat in the commercial sector of the economy. St. Petersburg.
40. Yani, P. S. (1997). Economic and official crimes. Moscow: Intel-Sintez Business School.
41. Yani, P. S. (2008). Distinguishing between bribery and fraud in judicial practice. Russian Yearbook of Criminal Law, 2, 809–834.
42. Damm, I. A. (2003). The concept, signs and types of corruption. Prevention of corruption in the criminal justice system. Collection of materials from the International scientific-practical seminar. Krasnoyarsk: KrasGU, 117–127.
43. Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part One): Federal Law of November 30, 1994 No. 51-FZ. Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 1994, 32, Art. 3301.
44. Bikeev, I. I. & Kabanov P. A. (Ed.). (2014). All about corruption and counteracting it: a terminological dictionary. Kazan: Knowledge.
45. Gazimzyanov, R. R. (Ed.). (2009). Corruption and anti-corruption policy: a dictionary. Kazan.
46. Maksimov, S. V., Insarov, O. A. & Pavlinov, A. V. (2019). Anti-corruption: textbook. allowance. Moscow: Prospect. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31085/9785392297016-2019-192
47. Reshetnikov, M. M. (2019). Psychology of corruption. Utopia and dystopia. Moscow: Yurayt.
48. Podolny, N. A., & Podolnaya, N. N. (2016). Corporate corruption: substantiation of the problem. All-Russian Criminological Journal, V.10, 3, 521–530. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2016.10(3).521-530
49. Shchedrin, N. V. & Damm, I. A. (Ed.). (2020). Anti-corruption security measures. Moscow: Prospect.
50. Khabrieva, T. Ya. (Ed.). (2021). Anti-corruption in organizations: international and national standards. Anti-corruption in organizations: international and national standards: materials of the Ninth Eurasian Anti-Corruption Forum. Moscow: Publishing house “Jurisprudence.”
51. Ageshkina, N. A., Belyanskaya, A. B. & Smushkin, A. B. Commentary to Federal Law No. 273-FZ of 25.12.2008 “On Combating Corruption” (article by article). Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru.
52. Akunchenko, E. A. (2018). Criminological characteristics and prevention of corruption in the electoral process of the Russian Federation. Krasnoyarsk.
53. Damm, I. A. (2006). Corruption in the Russian electoral process: concept and counteraction. Krasnoyarsk.
54. Zyryanova (Damm), I. A. (2013). Candidate's campaign headquarters-the subject of corruption in the electoral process? Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 4, 32–37.
55. Vyrva, P. A. (2020). Criminological aspects of corruption lobbying in law-making activities. Krasnoyarsk.
56. Kabanov, P. A. (2003). Some of the most dangerous negative social consequences of political corruption for modern Russian society. Moscow: INION RAN.
57. Kabanov, P. A. (2004). Political corruption in Russia: concept, essence, causes, prevention. Nizhnekamsk: Nizhnekamsk branch of MGEI.
58. Kostrykina, V. V. (2021). Ban on illegal financing of political activities as an anti-corruption standard of behavior in business. Siberian Anthropological Journal, 2, 198–205. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31804/2542-1816-2022-6-2-198-205
59. Avakyan, S. A. (Ed.). (2016). Anti-corruption: constitutional and legal approaches. Moscow: Yustitsinform.
60. Dolgova, A. I. (Ed.). (2005). Criminology: a textbook for universities. Moscow: Normа.
61. Damm, I. A. & Shchedrin, N.V. (Ed.). (2016). Fundamentals of anti-corruption education in the field of education. Krasnoyarsk: Sib. feder. un-t.
62. Semykina, O. I. (2017). Criminalization of illegal remuneration: a return to the roots or an anti-corruption novel? Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru.
63. Lopashenko, N. A. (2001). Corruption: content, problems of legal regulation. Criminal Law, 2, 98–102.
64. Criminal Law Convention on Corruption: Treaty of the Council of Europe dated January 27, 1999 No. 173. Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2009, 20, Art. 2394.
65. Antonova, E. Yu. (2015). Corporate (collective) liability for corruption offenses. Bulletin of the Khabarovsk State Academy of Economics and Law, 4–5, 118–123.
66. On judicial practice in cases of bribery and other corruption crimes: Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of July 9, 2013 No. 24. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 9.
67. Zyryanov, S. M. & Tsirin, A. M. (2015). Administrative liability for illegal remuneration on behalf of a legal entity. Journal of Russian Law, 2, 82–90. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.12737/7545
68. Akunchenko, E. A., Damm, I. A., Kostrykina, V. V. & Teplyashin, P. V. (2021). Anti-corruption potential of the ban on financing of election campaigns in the activities of commercial organizations. Journal of SFU. Humanities, 14, 680–692. Retrieved from http://10.17516/1997-1370-0751
69. Antonova, E. Yu. (2011). Conceptual foundations of corporate (criminal) liability. Saint-Petersburg: Publishing house: Yuridicheskiy tsentr-Press.
70. Kashepov, V. P. (2015). Criminal liability of legal entities for corruption offences. Journal of Russian Law, 3, 55–63. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.12737/7880
71. Sorochkin, R. A. (Ed.). (2021). Subject of a corruption crime: concept, types, characteristics, 238–264. Moscow: Prospect.
72. Fedorov, A. V. (2015). Criminal liability of legal entities for corruption offences. Journal of Russian Law, 1, 55–63.
73. Shchedrin, N. V., & Vostokov, A. A. (2017). Criminal liability of legal persons or other criminal law measures in relation to organizations. Criminal Law, 1, 58–61.
74. Avtonomov, A. S. (Ed.). (2017). Legal and organizational anti-corruption measures: a comparative study. Moscow: Lawyer.
75. Naumov, A. V. (2017). Criminal liability of legal entities (doctrinal and law-making aspects). Law and State, 1–2, 106–118.
76Forbes ranked the largest bribes in Russia in the 21st century. Retrieved from https://pasmi.ru/archive/234601/
77The colonels were recognized as real swindlers. Sergey Gudovany and Pavel Chermashentsev received real terms. Retrieved from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4120085
78Sentence No. 1-32/2020 dated 11/16/2020. Belevsky District Court (Tula Region). Retrieved from https//sudact.ru/regular/doc/ehYuSYe6TBoR/
79Sentence No. 1-14/2015 1-262/2014 of 04/07/2015. Leninsky District Court of Ufa (Republic of Bashkortostan). Retrieved from http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/14sKXmBQOTx9/

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

In the presented article, the subject of the study is the legal analysis of the criminological aspect of the phenomenon of corruption in commercial organizations. The research methodology mainly concerns the theoretical component. Methods such as analysis, synthesis, and comparative legal methods were used. The relevance of the chosen topic is due to the detrimental effect of the phenomenon of corruption on the development of the state and society, on the impact of corruption on the economy, on the formation of threats to economic and national security, when corruption is in an active phase. The scientific novelty of the work consists in the author's vision of solving problems related to the manifestations of criminological aspects of corruption, in the author's formulations and assessments of the desired topic. In the presented article, the author does not make cardinal proposals. The article is mostly descriptive in nature. The style of the article should be attributed to scientific and journalistic. According to the structure, the article contains an introductory part, the main content and conclusion. The author analyzes an impressive number of sources, in connection with which the article is filled with the positions of scientists and practitioners. The content of the article includes an overview of scientific approaches. The analysis of the conducted research allowed the author to identify the main approaches to understanding the features of corruption in commercial organizations, which reflect its various aspects, as well as ways to prevent it. Meanwhile, the question of the socio-legal characteristics of corruption in commercial organizations remains open today. It is difficult not to agree with the author's statement that the sphere of corruption in commercial organizations is both the internal management of a commercial organization and the external activities of a commercial organization carried out in conjunction with other business entities, including representatives of the public sector. The author's analysis of the conflict of interests between top managers and commercial organizations themselves is also interesting. At the same time, the beneficiaries of organizations experience negative consequences from corruption on the part of persons performing managerial functions to a greater extent than ordinary employees. The author's analysis leads to the identification of specific types of activities that allow the development of corruption. In particular, the potentially corrupt activities of commercial organizations should include, for example, their participation in charity. Charitable activities can be implemented in the form of sending gratuitous donations by the organization at the international level from a centralized fund; making special contributions by local companies to organize charity meetings or events; collecting funds exclusively among employees of organizations or clients (for example, in order to help the local population affected by flooding). The author's position regarding the subjects of passive corruption is also interesting. The author analyzes in terms of attributing to the subjects of passive bribery also persons working in the relevant commercial organizations in a different capacity (for example, a manager, consultant, engineer, specialist). At the same time, it should be emphasized that in accordance with the current legislation, the criminal legal qualification of corrupt acts of the latter categories of persons is very difficult. The author comes to the conclusion that corruption in commercial organizations is a complex socio-legal negative phenomenon in its content and has certain features that distinguish it from other types of corruption. Corruption in commercial organizations disrupts the normal activities of commercial organizations themselves, as well as causes irreparable harm to the state, society and individual citizens. The bibliography of the presented work includes an extensive list of 79 sources. This indicates a thorough study of the desired topic. The article may be of interest to readers and is recommended for publication.