Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Research approaches and paradigms in the study of the cultural environment of the city

Khil'ko Nikolai Fedorovich

ORCID: 0000-0003-3204-2216

Doctor of Pedagogy

Senior Researcher, Siberian Branch of the D.S. Likhachev Russian Cultural and Natural Heritage Research Institute; Professor of the Department of Directing and Choreography of the Omsk State University named after F.M. Dostoevsky

644077, Russia, Omsk region, Omsk, Andrianova str., 28, office 204A

fedorovich59@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Gorelova Yuliya

PhD in History

Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Siberian State Automobile and Road University

644077, Russia, Omsk region, Omsk, Anedrianova str., 28, office 204

gorrlovaj@mail.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2024.6.43531

EDN:

GMRECZ

Received:

08-07-2023


Published:

03-07-2024


Abstract: The subject of the study is a set of approaches and paradigms chosen by the authors to study the cultural environment of the city. The purpose of the work: a theoretical analysis of the variety of approaches to the definition of "cultural environment" in relation to the original category "culture." The object of the study is the definition of "culture" and "cultural environment" as part of the methodology for researching the cultural environment. The author considers in detail such aspects of the topic as general ideas about the cultural space, association with the category "culture" and features of the new, and integrative approach, according to which the cultural environment appears as a really perceived physical space, the area of implementation of cultural activities within the framework of socio-cultural communities, individual persons, axiological component of the cultural environment in the system of value coordinates, motivations and meanings, combination of axiological, information-semiotic and perceptual-aesthetic approaches to the study of the cultural environment. The relevance of the study consists in the need to understand the variety of research approaches to the study of the cultural environment, aimed at developing models of cultural policy at the regional and municipal levels. The scientific novelty of the study lies in understanding the essence of methodological paradigms emanating from the integrative definition of the cultural environment of the city. Another conclusion is related to the fact that culture in general, and the cultural environment in particular, determines axiological parameters, sets a system of value coordinates, motivations and meanings for man and humanity. The results of the work consist in understanding the existing methodological approaches to the study of the cultural environment of the city, determined by its integrative definition. The scope of the results: the scope of regional and municipal cultural policy.


Keywords:

city cultural environment, culture, research approaches, paradigms, methodological principles, cultural communications, cultural work, supra-biological needs, anthropocultural component, metaphysical meanins

This article is automatically translated.

The definition of "cultural environment" is actively used by researchers in works related in one way or another to the field of culture and art. At the same time, there is a variety of interpretations and definitions of this scientific construct. The relevance of the research lies in the need to comprehend the diversity of research approaches to the study of the cultural environment, aimed at developing effective models of its development in line with cultural policy at the regional and municipal levels. The subject of the study is a set of approaches and paradigms chosen by the authors to study the cultural environment of the city. The object of the study is the definitions of "culture" and "cultural environment" as part of the methodology of research on the cultural environment. The purpose of the work is a theoretical analysis of the variety of approaches to the definition of "cultural environment" in relation to the initial category of "culture".

The research methods consist in generalizing the interpretations of "culture" and "cultural environment", in a theoretical conceptual and methodological analysis of this area of cultural science.

The results of the work consist in understanding the existing methodological approaches to the study of the cultural environment of the city, due to its integrative definition. The scope of the results: the sphere of regional and municipal cultural policy. The scientific novelty of the research lies in understanding the essence of methodological paradigms emanating from the integrative definition of the cultural environment of the city.

As a result of the analysis of interpretations of the concept of "culture" and approaches to the study of the cultural environment, it becomes clear that different ideas about the cultural environment are justified by different interpretations of the concept of "culture".

We recognize that the list of studies adhering to one or another is extremely incomplete, but due to the compressed volume of the publication, we were forced to limit ourselves to this list of personalities.

Let's pay attention to the general and distinctive characteristics of approaches to the study of culture and the cultural environment of the city. At the same time, it becomes possible to identify specific grounds for their synthesis and complementarity.

The starting points of the literature analysis are the following. In our opinion, the general characteristics of studying the concepts of "culture" and "cultural environment" in the general context of research are: the value foundations of the cultural environment, its social role and the aesthetic imagery of the environment. Within the framework of these features, the distinctive features of cultural analysis are: preservation of culture, symbolic designation of the cultural environment. Of particular importance is the rapprochement of a person with society and the merging of components of the cultural environment into a complex. As a result of such phenomena, images of the cultural environment are formed and the interaction of a person and texts designating the cultural environment takes place. This gives rise to a number of studies of culture and the cultural environment that meet the following approaches: axiological, informational-semiotic, sociological, system-complex, perceptual-aesthetic and hermeneutic (see Table 1).

The main approaches to the study of culture and the cultural environment.

General characteristics.

Distinctive features.

1.

Axiological.

The value-semantic foundations of the cultural environment.

Preservation of culture.

2.

Informational and semiotic.

Symbolic designation of the cultural environment.

3.

Sociological.

The social role of the cultural environment.

The rapprochement of a person with society.

4.

Systemically integrated.

Merging the components of the cultural environment into a complex.

5.

Perceptual and aesthetic .

Aesthetic imagery of the environment.

Formation of images of the cultural environment.

6.

Hermeneutical.

The interaction of man and the texts of the designation of the cultural environment.

Table 1. General and distinctive characteristics of approaches to the study of culture and the cultural environment of the city.

Considering that the integrative approach implies "a holistic representation of a set of objects, phenomena, processes united by a community of at least one of the characteristics, resulting in its new quality" [1], we recognize that integration in our case arises as a new quality of combining the three leading characteristics of the cultural environment of the city: its value-semantic foundations, social role and aesthetic imagery, at the junction of which a new supra-natural integration is born. In accordance with the general and distinctive characteristics of the cultural environment of the city, we will consider the variety of approaches to its study.

The axiological approach to culture and the cultural environment is justified by the thesis of understanding culture as a space of values that determine human activity, motives, means and ways of achieving results. Its founder is A.J. Flier, whose understanding of culture is based on the value needs of a person in culture, which "in different combinations form a variety of options for cultural interaction" [2, p. 70].

From this, the ideological paradigm of the cultural environment is built, which D.S. Likhachev characterized as a necessary condition for the spiritual existence of a person and his sociality, coupled with the culture of the past, which accumulates into a certain stock of cultural strata of society. In this sense, according to the scientist, "the cultural environment is just as necessary for his spiritual, moral life, for his "spiritual settlement", for his attachment to his native places, for his moral self-discipline and sociality. ... A person is brought up in a certain cultural environment that has developed over many centuries, imperceptibly absorbing not only modernity, but also the past of his ancestors. The "stock" of cultural monuments, the "stock" of the cultural environment is extremely limited in the world, and it is being depleted at an ever-progressive rate" [3, p. 27].

The information-semiotic approach proceeds from Yu.M. Lotman's definition of culture as a complex sign system that immanently has its own memory, has special ways of studying and self-regulation, "is delimited from non-culture (nature) precisely by signedness; a system that draws natural non-signedness into itself and transforms it semiotically." This definition is based on the methods of semiotics, cybernetics and structuralism [4, p. 14]. In the definition of Yu.M. Lotman's culture there are: signedness, limitation, independence of development, social significance. This allows us to understand culture as a system of signs and symbols, an over-natural space in which the mental content of socially significant information transmitted through symbols and signs, including in art, is concentrated.

In the same vein, the metaphysical paradigm of the cultural environment is developing (Christopher A. Bail, D.L. Spivak), which allows us to understand the cultural environment as an immersive mentality for displaying the contours of culture. In this context, Christopher A. Bail suggests subjecting large volumes of cultural texts to integrative analysis using an integrative way of displaying cultural contours [5]. In this context, modern theories are developing that consider the metaphysics and semiotics of the city, aimed at generalizing and conceptualizing issues of social and cultural development of the city (metaphysics and semiotics of the city, as well as an attempt to generalize and conceptualize issues of social and cultural development of the city [6].

At the same time, when analyzing the cultural environment according to D.L. Spivak, as a phenomenon originating "from the internal logic of its own development", its entire metaphysical essence is revealed, subordinated to the mentality of the cultural environment of the city [7].

A completely new ontological turn in the study of the otherness of the culture of the Other is proposed by A.V. Maslova, who asserts in culture the concept of the semiosphere, expanding beyond not only civilization, but also humanity as a whole [8].

In general, recognizing the iconic and symbolic nature of culture, reflected in the definitions of culture by Y.M. Lotman, Christopher A. Bail, D.L. Spivak, A.V. Maslova, extrapolating them to the concept of "cultural environment", we consider it necessary to remove the distinction between natural and above natural, since within the cultural environment of the city these spheres always coexist in an indissoluble unity.

One of the founders of the sociological approach to the essence of culture, E. Taylor, understands it as a mental form of the development of a civilization with cultural layers and stages of formation. In this way, culture appears precisely as a spiritual culture that develops "from simpler, primitive forms to more mature, developed forms. Each subsequent cultural layer is superimposed on the previous one, becoming the basis for the formation of a future culture" [9, p. 125]. In this context, the cultural environment begins to be perceived in the paradigm of social identification as a "sociomental factor in understanding social life" [10], due to special socio-cultural conditions. This allows us to understand the cultural environment as a special cross-regional continuum in the environment of local identity.

In this regard, the research of foreign scientists on the artistic activity of residents in the urban cultural environment is of particular interest. [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. At the same time, it is of great importance to study the needs of residents in studying people's ideas about the cultural component of urban life (J. Hopkins) in order to better understand the relationship in the "human-cultural environment" system and contribute to the development of new theories about it [12]. In the context of this study, the approach of R. Nikolaas is important, linking urban culture with images in art [13]. The idea of creativity of the urban cultural environment, presented from the point of view of social innovation, is of interest. Landry [14].

In the sociological theory of the cultural environment in modern scientific research, the following become relevant: the idea of the implementation of the cultural environment by M. G. Uspayeva, N. M. Gachaeva [15], as well as the experience of cultural reflection by K. L. Filimonov in the context of its modernization [16].

Many modern scientists, in particular, E. E. Zakharova, conduct research on the concept of the "cultural environment of the city" in terms of its influence on the organization of public space [17]. The consideration of these problems from the standpoint of authenticity and cultural identity is carried out by Karimova I. S. She defines the conditions for the inclusion of artifacts in the cultural environment of the city, the development of urbanization of the urban cultural environment [18]. The study of the social consequences of urbanism, reflected in Russian online publications, is carried out by Permian scientists [19]. At the same time, special attention is paid to the study of pandemic and post-pandemic conditions for the formation of the cultural environment of the city: theories of extreme use of the virtual environment of the city are being developed by Ipatova S.S.[20]; the concept of expanded forms of sociality by V.E. Kemerovo [21].

The ethnocultural aspects of shaping the cultural environment in modern conditions are also studied by a number of modern scientists. Petrova L. E., Akhyamova I. A., Trofimova E. E., Egorova A. A. explore culture in the context of modern ethnocultural trends. At the same time, the task is fairly set: how to implement a national strategy in the face of global challenges [22], in particular, when considering the methodology of cross-cultural research [23]. In the same direction, Novikova A. A., Malshina N. A. and Kamenskaya I. V. study cultural industries as part of the public environment of the city in the process of transformation of forms of civic participation [24, 25].

M.S. Kagan, one of the prominent representatives of the system-integrated approach to the concept of "culture", bases his ideas about it as a cyclical phenomenon, a self-developing and self-organizing system. Describing this system, the author writes about the "high complexity, which includes the processes of destruction and restoration, which explains the fact that cultural research should turn to synergetic ideas" [26, p. 24]. Based on synergetic ideas, M.S. Kagan's theory of culture is extrapolated into understanding culture in the context of the cultural environment as a complex natural and social system in which all elements are interconnected and interdependent. This allows us to see the integrative paradigm of the cultural environment, in line with which the integrative-systemic direction of her research is developing by E.I. Strelkova, E.I. Shulepova.

This paradigm also involves considering the cultural environment in the context of globalization. According to E.I. Strelkova, the global cultural environment should include "standards of creativity, universal values, universal norms of morality, achievements of science and art, teachings of world religions, an international language and a universal symbolic system" [27, p. 37].

Emphasizing the historical aspect of the cultural environment, E. A. Shulepova notes the presence of many cultural heritage images in it, subordinated to the social strata forming the picture of the environment. At the same time, it is found that "in real localized spaces, based on the material of historical and cultural objects, in fact, the dynamics of the cultural process can be revealed, the transmission of special cultural experience through the institutional level or other channels to everyday consciousness" [28, p. 56].

The perceptual-aesthetic approach is based on the understanding of culture from the point of view of visualogy as a set of ways of symbolic and symbolic expression of the change of visual thematism under the influence of cultural factors and changes, which corresponds to V.M. Rozin's concept of the relationship between man, culture and the environment [29].

Hence, the understanding of culture as a visual understanding of the cultural environment is justified. This makes it possible to see in this context a visual-figurative paradigm of studying the cultural environment (V.L. Kagansky, A.A. Vysokovsky: [30, 31]. In the same direction, the development of a group of modern domestic scientists is developing (T.V. Bernyukevich, A.A. Volkov, K.N. Gatsunaev, E.G. Krivykh, S.D. Mezentsev, T.A. Molokova, V.V. Neganov, Yu.V. Dedyatenko, M.A. Khasieva) philosophical and socio-cultural problems of urban development [32] concerning the cultural environment. The concepts of poly-artistic and multimedia representation in reflecting images of heritage and historical memory in the urban cultural environment are also of particular importance [33, 34].

These issues are actively being addressed abroad Lai S.-K. substantiating evidence of urban spatial self-organization [35].

It seems acceptable to us an unusual form of modeling current and promising images of the development of the cultural and leisure environment in the context of trends in the development of the socio-cultural space of the city was presented by modern Chelyabinsk scientists Zubanova L. B., Sinetsky S. B., Syrkina E. G. [36].

V.L. Kagansky's views on the cultural environment are based on the landscape approach. In this regard, the conceptual hermeneutics of the landscape is indicated. The scientist focuses on spatial forms and meanings of the environmental organization of the cultural landscape [37].

In turn, A.A. Vysokovsky's approach is based on ideas about visual images of the urban cultural environment, which "develops gradually by superimposing multi-format technical and artistic solutions" in the spatial "phenomenon of connecting a person with his environment" [38, p. 45].

The hermeneutical approach is based on the works of F. Schleimacher, by which he understands "a certain spiritual integrity that has its obligatory material embodiment", "a text that can be comprehended by getting used to it ... by the method of "feeling" based on his own techniques, personal art and subjective methods of understanding it" [39, p. 98]. Developed by F. Schleimacher's contextual hermeneutical approach to the "text- monument – culture" system makes it possible to approach the communicative paradigm when studying the cultural environment.

In this aspect of the study of cultural and creative landscape forms of the cultural environment, V.L. Kagansky substantiates the first, perceptual form of communication - the theoretical and geographical vision of the cultural environment and landscape, that is, a kind of conceptual hermeneutics, their spatial forms and meaning [40].

At the same time, V.V. Abashev, when studying the mountain cultural environment in its development, discovers another, productive form of communication – cultural identity, which appears to be a multi-layered and multidimensional expression of urban identity, irreducible to one denominator. At the same time, the author points out the possible "construction of images of the territory, which ... sometimes takes the form of searches for the metaphysical essence of the city, like Genius Loci (Geniuses of the Place)" [41, p. 18].

So, these approaches have identified the distinctive features of various interpretations of the concepts of "culture" and "cultural environment of the city" and the corresponding research paradigms: ecological, metaphysical, social identification, integrative, visual-figurative, communicative, among which the most important is integrative with the addition of new meanings. At the same time, it becomes clear that different ideas about the cultural environment are justified by different interpretations of the concept of "culture".

In addition, the connection between the main approaches to the study of culture and the cultural environment of the city and the paradigms of the urban cultural environment is obvious. The axiological approach reveals the special importance of the ecological paradigm. The information-semiotic approach leads to the dominance of the metaphysical paradigm of the cultural environment of the city. Within the framework of the sociological approach, a paradigm of social identification of citizens emerges. In turn, the system-integrated approach is indicated in the form of an integrative paradigm. The perceptual-aesthetic approach gives rise to a visual-figurative paradigm, and the hermeneutic approach gives rise to a communicative one (Table 2).

The main approaches to the study of culture and the cultural environment.

Paradigms of studying the urban cultural environment.

1.

Axiological.

Ecological.

2.

Informational and semiotic.

Metaphysical .

3.

Sociological.

Social identification.

4.

Systemically integrated.

Integrative.

5.

Perceptual and aesthetic .

Visually-shaped.

6.

Hermeneutical.

Communicative.

Table 2. The relationship between the main approaches to the study of culture and the cultural environment of the city and the paradigms of the urban cultural environment.

Based on the fact that culture is a special sphere of human activity, within which the creation, storage, transmission and consumption of cultural values (material and spiritual) take place, and cultural norms and values, in turn, determine the very activity of a person and society, namely its goals, methods, methods and desired results In this activity, it is possible to outline the basic methodological principles of understanding and researching the cultural environment, taking into account the main provisions of various methodological approaches and paradigms.

In this multi-paradigm plane of studying the cultural environment, in our opinion, attention should be focused on the following fundamental points.

Firstly, the cultural environment, on the one hand, acts as a really perceived physical space, the natural characteristics of which have been changed to one degree or another by anthropogenic impact. Each cultural community creates its own specific visually perceived images, implemented in the architectural environment, art, etc.

Secondly, the environment is a space (place) within which cultural activities of both socio-cultural communities and individuals are realized. At the same time, the specificity of the anthropocultural component determines the specifics of the formed environment, as a space above nature, due to the presence of a whole range of supra-biological needs, abilities, attitudes and qualities in a person. In this sense, such environmental parameters as space, people, and activity will become key.

In this regard, it is necessary to create a third plan of research on the cultural environment, as a quality that must ensure the very possibility of cultural interactions and relationships. In this sense, the environment is a system of cultural communications between various subjects. At the same time, cultural communications are understood as a system of integrative interactions between various subjects.

It should be noted that the cultural environment immanently determines the laws and parameters of cultural communications. Accordingly, the focus shifts to the communicative and normative parameters of the environment. It appears as a tool and system for encoding and decoding cultural information, texts and meanings.

Another important aspect is that culture in general, and the cultural environment in particular, defines axiological parameters, sets a system of value coordinates, motivations and meanings for man and humanity.

Taking into account the above mentioned parameters allows us to form a new integrative paradigm based on a combination of axiological, informational-semiotic and perceptual-aesthetic approaches to the study of the cultural environment. So, the cultural environment is a physical human—created space of cultural communications that defines axiological parameters, a system of value coordinates, motivations and meanings of human activity. This definition is distinguished from the existing ones by its capacity, realism, integrative fullness, and focus on the value-oriented space of a person and society. It is fully confirmed by the analysis of the points of view presented in the article on the culture and cultural environment of the city. At the same time, the practical applicability of this innovation is obvious and consists in using it to develop models of regional and municipal cultural policy.

References
1. Petrov, A.V., & Zyryanov, A.V. (2017). Integrative approach in modern legal research. In Bulletin of SUSU. Series: Right, 3. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/integrativnyy-podhod-v-sovremennyh-yuridicheskih-issledovaniyah
2. Flier, A.Ya. (2012). Culture. In World of Culture and Cultural Studies, 2, 68-73.
3. Likhachev, D. S. (1980). Ecology of culture. In Monuments of the atherland, 25-29. Moscow.
4. Lotman, Y. M. (1995). Culture and Explosion. Moscow.
5. Christopher, A. Bail Published: (2014). The cultural environment: measuring culture with big data. In Theory and Society, 43, 465–482.
6. Bernyukevich, T.V. (2022). Sociocultural space of the city: from the metaphysics of the city to the study of urban practices. In Society: philosophy, history, culture, 7(99). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsiokulturnoe-prostranstvo-goroda-ot-metafiziki-goroda-do-issledovaniya-gorodskih-praktik.
7. Spivak, D.L. (2003). Metaphysics of St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg.
8. Maslova, A.V. (2023). Dialogue of disjoint semiospheres in a single space of culture. In Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 56-63. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dialog-neperesekayuschihsya-semiosfer-v-edinom-prostranstve-kultur
9. Taylor E. (1998). Primitive culture. Moscow.
10. Dzyakovich, E.V. (2010).Formation of local identity: territorial factors and their socio-cultural significance (on the example of the territory of Prikhoperye ). In Vestnik PAGS, 2, 65-69. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formirovanie-mestnoy-identichnosti-territorialnye-faktory-i-ih-sotsiokulturnoe-znachenie-na-primere-territorii-prihoperya
11. Gastman, R.(1969). Skateboard, hip hop, and tattoo. In Juxtapoz Magazin, 4, 89-92. N.Y.
12. Hopkins, J. (2009). Urban Culture of Public space. In Carolina: The University of Western Ontario Press. Ibid.
13. Nycolaas, R. (2005). Urban Culture and Public Art. URL: http://www.ifhp.org/search/site.
14. Landry, C. (2005). Creative City. Moscow.
15. Uspaeva, M. G., & Gachaev, A. M. (2022). Implementation of the cultural environment in the economic community. In International journal of applied sciences and technologies "Integral", 3, 120-124. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/implementatsiya-kulturnoy-sredy-v-ekonomicheskoe-soobschestvo
16. Filimonova, K. L. (2020). Modernization of the sphere of culture in Russia in the late 1990s – early 2000s: experience of cultural reflection. In Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 6(835), 89-96. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modernizatsiya-sfery-kultury-v-rossii-kontsa-1990-h-nachala-2000-h-gg-opyt-kulturologicheskoy-refleksii
17. Zakharova, E.E. (2020). The cultural environment of the city as part of the public space. In Man and culture, 1, 98-102. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnaya-sreda-goroda-kak-chast-obschestvennogo-prostranstva
18. Karimov, I.S. (2022). Issues of authenticity and cultural identity in the design of the urban environment. In Society: philosophy, history, culture, 3(95), 45-49. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/voprosy-autentichnosti-i-kulturnoy-identichnosti-v-dizayne-gorodskoy-sredy
19. Urbanism and urbanists in Russian online publications of the 2010 (2020). V.V. Abashev [and others]; holes ed. M.P. Abasheva; Perm State National Research University. Perm.
20. Ipatova, S. S. (2021). Sphere of culture in a pandemic: problems and opportunities. In Scientific notes of young researchers, 1, 34-39. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sfera-kultury-v-usloviyah-pandemii-problemy-i-vozmozhnosti
21. Kemerov, V.E. (2021). Culture – a form of sociality. Sociology, 3, 113-118. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kultura-forma-sotsialnosti
22. Petrova, L.E., Akhyamova, I.A., Trofimova, E.E., & Egorova, A.A. (2021). Culture of modernity, modernity in culture: how to implement a national strategy in the context of global challenges. In Management issues, 2(69), 98-123. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kultura-sovremennosti-sovremennost-v-kulture-kak-realizovat-natsionalnuyu-strategiyu-v-usloviyah-globalnyh-vyzovov
23. Tangalycheva, R.K. (2022). To the question of the methodology of cross-cultural research. In Telescope, 4, 78-85. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-metodologii-krosskulturnogo-issledovaniya
24. Novikova, A. A. (2020). "Cultural industries" as part of the public sphere: transformation of forms of complicity. In Art culture, 32, 65-86.
25. Malshina, N. A., & Kamenskaya, I. V. (2021). Formation of the institutional environment of the cultural industry in the regions of Russia. In Culture and education: scientific and information journal of universities of culture and arts, 3(42), 69-75. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formirovanie-institutsionalnoy-sredy-industrii-kultury-v-regionah-rossii
26. Kagan, M. S. (1986). Philosophy of Culture. Spb.
27. Srelkova, E.I. (2014). Cultural environment and its system-forming components. In Theory and practice of social development, 13, 35-44. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnaya-sreda-i-ee-sistemoobrazuyuschie-komponenty
28. Shulepova, E. A.(2011). Cultural environment of the historical city: methodology of study and broadcast. In Cultural Science Journal, 2, 55-59. 2. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnaya-sreda-istoricheskogo-goroda
29. Rozin V.M. (1980). Culture, man, environment. In Questions of philosophy, 1, 13-22.
30. Kagansky, V. L. (2011). Research of the Russian cultural landscape as a whole and some of its results. In International Journal of Cultural Research, 4(5), 56-59. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-rossiyskog.9lfnf
31. Vysokovsky, A.A. (2008). Visual images of the urban environment. M.: Locus Standi.
32. Philosophical and sociocultural problems of the city's development (2020): monograph . T.V. Bernyukevich, A.A. Volkov, K.N. Gatsunaev, E.G. Krivykh, S.D. Mezentsev, T.A. Molokova, V.V. Neganov, Yu.V. Podobenko, M.A. Khasieva. Moscow.
33. Gorelova, Y.R., & Khilko, N.F. (2021). Artistic and multimedia representation in reflecting images of heritage and historical memory in the urban cultural environment. In Cultural Journal, 3(45), 87-92. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/hudozhestvennaya-i-multimediynaya-reprezentatsiya-v-otrazhenii-obrazov-naslediya-i-istoricheskoy-pamyati-v-gorodskoy-kulturnoy
34. Gorelova, Y.R., & Khilko, N.F. (2021). Methodology of multi-artistic and multimedia representation of images of heritage and historical memory in the urban cultural environment. In Science. Art. Culture, 2(30), 66-74. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metodologiya-polihudozhestvennoy-i-multimediynoy-reprezentatsii-obrazov-naslediya-i-istoriches
35. Lai, S.-K. (2020). Evidence of urban spatial self-organization. In Journal of Urban Management, 9(4), 56-59.
36. Zubanov, L. B., Sinetsk, S. B., & Syrkina, E. G. (2020). Actual trends in the development of the socio-cultural space of a modern city: experience in trend modeling. In Chelyabinsk Humanitarian, 2(51), 123-129. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktualnye-tendentsii-razvitiya-sotsiokulturnogo-prostranstva-sovremennogo-goroda-opyt-trend-modelirovaniya
37. Kagansky, V. L. (2011). Research of the Russian cultural landscape as a whole and some of its results. In International Journal of Cultural Research, 4(5), 68-72. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-rossiyskogo-kulturnogo-landshafta-kak-tselogo-i-nekotorye-ego-rezultaty
38. Vysokovsky, A.A. (2008). Visual images of the urban environment. Moscow: Locus Standi.
39. Schleiermacher, F. Hermeneutics (2004). Translation from German by A.L. Volsky. St. Petersburg: "European House."
40. Kagansky, V. L. (2011). Research of the Russian cultural landscape as a whole and some of its results. In International Journal of Cultural Research, 4(5), 69-75. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-rossiyskogo-kulturnogo-landshafta
41. Abashev, V.V. (2015). Perm monumental rhetoric of local identity: monuments, emblems and art objects in the city space. In Labyrinth. Journal of Social and Humanitarian Studies, 1, 14-19. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/permskaya-monumentalnaya-ritorika-mestnoy-identichnosti-pamyatniki-emblemy-i-art-obekty-v-prostranstve-goroda

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

From a formal point of view, the author formulated the subject of the study incorrectly in the first part of the article: "The subject of the study is research approaches and paradigms of the concept of "cultural environment"." Firstly, a formal sign of a logical error is a violation of the norms of the Russian language in agreeing on the definition (singular used) and predicate (plural used): "the subject ... is." Violation of logic in such cases is excluded by clarifying the subject: for example, "the subject of the study is a set (series, sample, set) of approaches and paradigms of research on the cultural environment." Secondly, the theoretical oxymoron of the "paradigm of the concept" is jarring: 1) if the author meant research approaches to the definition of the concept of "cultural environment", then the paradigm, as a set of fundamental scientific attitudes, ideas and terms, cannot be limited to a single concept; 2) if the author synonymously uses the terms "research approach" = "research paradigm", then the correct formulation may look like this: "the subject of the study is a set (a number, a sample, a set) of research approaches and paradigms that include (interpret) the concept of the cultural environment (or the concept of "cultural environment")." The reviewer pays such attention to a number of formal errors in determining the subject of the study due to two circumstances. Firstly, similar incidents occur further down the text, making it extremely difficult to read the author's thoughts (for example: "In this context, the cultural environment begins to be perceived in the paradigm of social identification as socio-cultural as a "sociomental factor in understanding social life", a socio-cultural and sociomental phenomenon that forms a special cultural environment as a cross-regional continuum expressing its inter-local identity", "The ethnocultural aspect of studying the cultural environment is also seen in a number of studies by modern scientists on the methodology of cross-cultural research", "An unusual view was presented by modeling current and promising images of the development of the cultural and leisure environment of the city presented by modern Chelyabinsk scientists", etc.). Moreover, the author provides the examples given by the reviewer in the text with links to sources, which borders on an incorrect interpretation of the opinion of colleagues. The reviewer strongly recommends that when finalizing the article, approach the formulation of statements more thoughtfully, avoiding violations of logic, linguistic norms and distortions of the quoted or commented provisions. Secondly, the reviewer draws the author's attention to the fact that the correct correction of the subject (for example, "the subject of the study is a set (series, sample, set) of approaches and paradigms of cultural environment research") indicates the need to justify a preliminary sample (limitations of a series, set or set). Moreover, the author states: "The scientific novelty consists in the development of an integrative approach [the author's agreement] to the concept of "cultural environment" based on a polyparagmal analysis associated with the category of "culture" and determined by it." Since the integrative approach stated by the author implies "a holistic representation of a set of objects, phenomena, processes united by the commonality of at least one of the characteristics, as a result of which its new quality is created" (see Petrov A.V., Zyryanov A.V. Integrative approach in modern legal studies // Bulletin of SUSU. Series: Law. 2017. No.3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/integrativnyy-podhod-v-sovremennyh-yuridicheskih-issledovaniyah (date of appeal: 07/09/2023), a simple admission "that the list of studies adhering to one or another is extremely incomplete [author's agreement], but due to the compressed volume of the publication, we were forced to limit ourselves to this list of personalities" is not enough. The selection of literature for review should be of a well-founded systematic nature, assuming the possibility of methodological integration of selected approaches and paradigms on at least one common basis. Otherwise, the final conclusion ("Taking into account the above mentioned parameters allows us to form a new integrative paradigm based on a combination of axiological, informational-semiotic [double hyphen of the author] and perceptual-aesthetic approaches to the study of the cultural environment") looks baseless, not following from the arguments considered in the text. To avoid this, the reviewer recommends in the main part to focus the reader's attention on the general and distinctive characteristics of the approaches, indicating the specific grounds for their synthesis or mutual complementarity. If they do not have similar properties, there is no point in mentioning and analyzing them based on goal setting. The relevance of the research presented for consideration is not obvious. Even if the work is purely theoretical in nature, the reader should be clear about the ultimate task of theorizing: a) does it form new ideas about reality? if so, how do they differ from the already known ones? b) how to apply the author's theoretical innovations? if they greatly facilitate the work of other researchers, then the author has a great future, and his work will be torn into quotations; if not, then the author simply stole the time of the reviewer and any other reader. The scientific novelty of the article also remains in doubt. In the goal setting, the author promised to develop an integrative approach to the concept of "cultural environment". In the conclusions, he postulates three "fundamental points", reducing, in essence, the cultural environment (firstly) to a physical space, (secondly) to an "above-natural" space, (thirdly) to the quality of space that provides the possibility of communication ("the environment is a system of cultural communications between various subjects" — i.e. sewerage). By reducing the degree of ornateness of the author's expressions, it is possible to reduce a specific definition from his words: the cultural environment is a physical human—created space of cultural communications that defines axiological parameters, a system of value coordinates, motivations and meanings of human activity. It is quite an acceptable definition, it remains only to distinguish it from the existing ones, to clarify what the author understands by cultural communications and to justify the practical applicability of innovations and to criticize unsuitable ones (for example, Yu. M. Lotman). Otherwise, it is difficult to talk about the presence of scientific novelty. The style of presentation of thought tends to be scientific, but a lot of logical incidents, paradoxical terminological oxymorons and explicit descriptions make it extremely difficult to read the author's thought (see examples above). The text should be carefully proofread. The structure of the article as a whole reflects some logic of scientific research, but not all the analyzed approaches are reflected in the final conclusions. The bibliography as a whole reflects the problem area, but the descriptions of the sources require revision according to a single GOST. Due to the stylistic and logical errors noted above, an appeal to opponents does not always look correct. According to the reviewer, the article requires serious revision. In particular, having no program for further application, the presented theoretical arguments of the author are unlikely to arouse the interest of the readership of the magazine "Culture and Art".

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author submitted his article "Research approaches and paradigms in the study of the cultural environment of the city" to the journal "Culture and Art", in which a study of a set of scientific directions devoted to the study of interpretations of the concept of "culture" and approaches to the study of the cultural environment, and the urban cultural environment in particular, was conducted. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that the general characteristics of studying the concepts of "culture" and "cultural environment" in the general context of research are: the value foundations of the cultural environment, its social role and the aesthetic imagery of the environment. Within the framework of these features, the author identifies the following distinctive features of cultural analysis: preservation of culture, symbolic designation of the cultural environment. Of particular importance to the author is the rapprochement of a person with society and the merging of components of the cultural environment into a complex, as a result of which the formation of images of the cultural environment and the interaction of a person and texts of the designation of the cultural environment takes place. The relevance of this study is due to the author's need to understand the diversity of research approaches to the study of the cultural environment, aimed at developing effective models for its development in line with cultural policy at the regional and municipal levels. The scientific novelty of the research lies in understanding the essence of methodological paradigms emanating from the integrative definition of the cultural environment of the city. The theoretical basis was the works of such researchers as M.S. Kagan, A.Ya., Flier, D.S. Likhachev, Y.M. Lotman, D.L. Spivak, etc. The research methods consist in generalizing the interpretations of "culture" and "cultural environment", in a theoretical conceptual and methodological analysis of this area of cultural science. The subject of the study is a set of approaches and paradigms chosen by the authors to study the cultural environment of the city. The object of the study is the definitions of "culture" and "cultural environment" as part of the methodology of research on the cultural environment. The aim of the work is a theoretical analysis of the variety of approaches to the definition of "cultural environment" in relation to the initial category of "culture". Based on the bibliographic and content analysis of scientific literature, the author identifies a number of studies of culture and the cultural environment that meet the following approaches: axiological, informational-semiotic, sociological, system-integrated, perceptual-aesthetic and hermeneutic. The author presents in detail the general characteristics and distinctive features of each approach. The study of these approaches allowed the author to identify the distinctive features of various interpretations of the concepts of "culture" and "cultural environment of the city" and the corresponding research paradigms: ecological, metaphysical, social identification, integrative, visual-figurative, communicative, among which the most important is integrative with the addition of new meanings. The author also identifies the connection between the main approaches to the study of culture and the cultural environment of the city and the paradigms of the urban cultural environment. Thus, the axiological approach reveals the special importance of the ecological paradigm. The information-semiotic approach leads to the dominance of the metaphysical paradigm of the cultural environment of the city. Within the framework of the sociological approach, a paradigm of social identification of citizens emerges. In turn, the system-integrated approach is indicated in the form of an integrative paradigm. The perceptual-aesthetic approach gives rise to a visual-figurative paradigm, and the hermeneutical one gives rise to a communicative one. The author outlines the basic methodological principles of understanding and researching the cultural environment, taking into account the main provisions of various methodological approaches and paradigms: the cultural environment acts as a really perceived physical space, the natural characteristics of which are changed to varying degrees by anthropogenic impact; the environment is a space (place) within which cultural activities of both socio-cultural communities and The environment is a system of cultural communications between various subjects. In conclusion, the author presents a conclusion on the conducted research, which contains all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the cultural environment of the city is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The bibliographic list of the study consists of 41 sources, including foreign ones, which seems sufficient for generalization and analysis of scientific discourse on the studied problem. The author fulfilled his goal, received certain scientific results that allowed him to summarize the material. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication. However, the text of the article needs correction, in particular, the need to transliterate the names of foreign authors.