Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

A Symbol behind the Image: Reading the Painting by Alexander Volkov

Abbasova Galina

Leading Specialist in Public Outreach Programmes, Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts

119019, Russia, Moscow, Volkhonka str., 12

abbasova_galina@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2023.3.40113

EDN:

LQPCLR

Received:

28-03-2023


Published:

04-04-2023


Abstract: Alexander Nikolaevich Volkov (1886–1957) is one of the Soviet Uzbekistan fine art founders. He actively taught in Tashkent and had a significant impact on the younger generation of the artists. He was a member of the association "New East Masters", headed the informal group "Volkov's Brigade" trying to solve the problems of monumental painting. In addition, the artist's work has some traces of symbolism and impressionism, cubism and primitive art. This article is devoted to Volkov's painting "Teahouse with a portrait of V.I. Lenin”, created in 1928 and stored in The Karakalpakstan State Museum of Art. This picture was painted at a time when the master, in his own words, again turned to human. Therefore the masterpiece corresponded the request to design a new Soviet way of life, to invent the heroes among workers and dekhkans (peasants). However, behind the simple interpretation of "Teahouse", there is a deep symbolism, thanks to which the images go beyond the scope of an ideological statement, turning into a kind of myth. The novelty of this research can be found in the formulation of a problem that has not previously been considered in the scientific literature - the symbolic interpretation of the works of A.N. Volkov of the "socialist realist" period. This symbolic layer in the artist's works is the additional evidence of his sincere passion from the ideas of the cultural revolution and socialist movement in Central Asia. In addition, Volkov's paintings of the late 1920s and 1930s are often overshadowed by his earlier creative experiments. The purpose of this article is to consider and analyze one of the most revealing work belonged to the late period of the artist oeuvre, to identify the semantic layers behind the “tangible breath of the flesh”.


Keywords:

Alexander Volkov, red teahouse, Soviet Uzbekistan, art of Central Asia, Nukus, social realism, art of the 1920s, color symbolism, Michail Kurzin, Usto Mumin

This article is automatically translated.

The image of a teahouse is one of the most common in the visual arts of Central Asia. A teahouse is both a shelter from the scorching midday heat, under the canopy of which you can drink tea and taste pilaf, and a place for meetings and conversations that attracts absolutely dissimilar people of different social origins and levels of wealth. The teahouse is a vivid example of national color, embodied in traditional architecture and ancient utensils, colorful carpets and clothes of guests. The teahouse was one of those oriental dreams that inevitably attracted European travelers. Viktor Ufimtsev described his first impressions of Samarkand as follows: "No, I could not believe that this was life. Here sits Khan from the opera “Prince Igor”, and there, look, ? Barakh from “Turandot" sells melons. And the teahouses! There we also sat for hours on colored palas, swallowing a new, unknown life together with green tea" [23, p. 44].

 

A.V. Isupov. Teahouse. 1920-1921Vyatka Art Museum named after V.M. and A.M. Vasnetsov 

A.V. Isupov.

Teahouse. 1920-1921.The Vasnetsov Brothers Art Museum

The teahouse was associated with the coolness of fountains and gardens, where one could taste fragrant tea in the shade of elms and plane trees.

 

  When M.A. Bulgakov visited the All-Russian Agricultural and Handicraft Industrial Exhibition of 1923, it was the Central Asian teahouse recreated on the banks of the Moskva River that attracted his attention: "Behind the Turkestan cunning, painted house there is some kind of biblical arba <...> Then along the shore, along the road, under the trees there are wooden canopies and low decking covered with oriental carpets. The smell of Muscovites' barbecue beckons here, and white Moscow young ladies, guys, men in European jackets, legs tucked up in pointed shoes, with blurred smiles on their faces, sit on colorful thick fabrics" [6, p. 342].But a teahouse is also a place where stories are told, destinies change.

A tragic story once heard by A.V. Nikolayev (Usto Mumin) from an old teahouse in Samarkand, laid the foundation for a whole series of works dedicated to beautiful young men [14].  The teahouse also became an unexpected source of inspiration for M.M. Filippovich, who described such an incident that happened to him near Tashkent: looking for salvation from the heat, he wandered into a small teahouse, where he was served tea and a piece of black bread, which turned out to be half-baked and sticky so much that the artist fashioned a figure of a woman lifting a burqa out of it. The old men sitting next to him began to shake their heads disapprovingly, one of them explained to him in broken Russian that it was a sin to portray a woman, especially with an open face. This incident, as well as numerous tragic stories about women who decided to remove the burqa, inspired Filippovich to write a sketch "Nationwide burqa burning" [24].

 

A.V. Nikolaev (Usto Mumin). The Red teahouse.Mu?tum magazine. 1933. No. 8

A.V. Nikolaev (Usto Mumin).

The Red teahouse.Journal «Mu?tum». 1933. ¹ 8

The fact that the teahouse was a constant place of mass attraction of urban residents, a kind of traditional "club", was very quickly adopted by the Soviet government, which sought to include teahouses in the sphere of ideological propaganda, placing propaganda literature, portraits of party leaders, etc. In them, for example, in 1924 in Tashkent in the Sibzar part of the mahalla A red teahouse with a library and a stage was opened at Mahvata, and groups of singers, musicians and lovers of dramatic art were organized.

 

The daily attendance of the teahouse club was up to 150 men and, significantly for Soviet teahouses, up to 30 Uzbek women [15]. Photographs of Soviet, so–called red teahouses were widely distributed - the Red Teahouse in the village of Galya-Tigermon (1930, Samarkand State Museum-Reserve); the Red Teahouse in the Vostok quarter (1931, Samarkand State Museum-Reserve); the Red Teahouse in old Samarkand (1931, Kunstkamera), etc. One of the characteristic elements of these Soviet clubs were posters, drawings and paintings by artists designed to formalize the new way of life of workers and peasants. When a circle of young artists formed around A.N. Volkov, including N.G. Karakhan, U.T. Tansykbayev, P. Shchegolev, and others, one of the directions of their activity was the collective work on painting Soviet clubs and teahouses.

 

 

Red teahouse in old Samarkand. onethousandninehundredthirtyoneMuseum of Anthropology and Ethnography named after

Peter the Great (Kunstkamera), St. PetersburgRed teahouse in old Samarkand. 1931.

Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (the Kunstkamera), Saint-PetersburgThe image of the red teahouse has firmly entered the repertoire of artists of the Soviet East, it can be found among the paintings and graphic works of such masters as A.V. Nikolaev, M.I. Kurzin, B.K. Hamdami, A. Tashkent, etc.

 

A.N. Volkov, who was at the origins of the formation of the art school of Soviet Uzbekistan, has repeatedly addressed this topic. One of his most revealing works dedicated to the red teahouse is "In the Teahouse", or "Teahouse with a Portrait of Lenin" (1928, I.V. Savitsky State Museum of Arts of the Republic of Karakalpakstan). The idea of the painting is strictly verified. It does not seem accidental that the artist placed the portrait image of V.I. Lenin precisely in the upper left corner of the canvas: the portrait, although located in the background, as if in the shadow of the room, is an extremely important compositional and semantic element. Recall that the painting was painted in 1928, that is, Lenin has not been among the living for four years, but his image is visibly present and, as it were, introduced into the circle of communication of the Uzbeks depicted on the canvas. Moreover, the portrait is compositionally included in the circle of characters that completely occupy the center of the canvas.

 

A.N. Volkov. "A teahouse with a portrait of Lenin". onethousandninehundredtwentyeightI.V. Savitsky State Museum of Arts of the Republic of Karakalpakstan, Nukus

A.N. Volkov.

"A teahouse with a portrait of Lenin". 1928.The Karakalpakstan State Museum of Art, Nukus

Four dehkans (peasants) are represented in the painting, which is definitely indicated by the nature of the clothes, and especially by the traditional labor tool depicted in the lower right corner of the picture, which is held in the hands of a character in a green robe.

 

 

This ketmen is an instrument of the Uzbek farmer, as inseparable from his image as, for example, a sickle for the Russian peasantry. Ketmen is shown not just as an iconic element, as a symbol, but is included in a certain process – a dehkan sharpens its blade with a bar. With this technique, the artist purposefully achieves the formation of an expressive and significant compositional diagonal axis: in the upper left corner is the image of Lenin, in the lower right corner, that is, diagonally from him is ketmen, being prepared for the start of work. A figure in a dark robe, placed in the background at the left edge of the picture, but also inscribed in the circle of the main characters, performs a rather important function: the gaze of this peasant is directed to the lower right corner of the picture at ketmen. With this technique, the artist visually emphasizes and strengthens the diagonal axis of the composition, emphasizing that the dehkans depicted on the canvas are not idlers who spend whole days in a teahouse, they only took a short break in their work.

At the same time, the semantic load associated with the idea of creative work is enhanced by the background of the painting, which is interrupted by two rectangular openings with a view of the sunlit landscape under a narrow strip of blue cloudless sky. The components that form the landscape – hills, thickets of trees, dense buildings, create a conditional image of a garden city, denoting not a mathematical, but a historical perspective, an opportunity to see the future and the result of labor. The artist thus finds an amazing opportunity to depict not the serene rest inherent in the East, not a fiesta endlessly lasting in the cool shade of a teahouse, not the traditionally "dormant" East, but the new East, in which the actors – in this case, the dehkans – only briefly interrupted their hard work for a short respite and are already preparing to continue it.

The analysis of the compositional structure and the plot of the painting leads to reflections on the color palette. It seems that this most important element of the picture is designed to convey to the viewer a deep hidden meaning. First of all, attention is drawn to the fact that the artist uses a natural color scheme characteristic of the local nature, conveying shades of earth, greenery and water. This triad is a symbol of the eternal rebirth of nature, one of the elements of which is a person who puts his work into its renewal. By dressing the characters of the painting in robes of three different colors, the artist gives them a special additional meaning. The central composition circle includes dehkans in clothes of the color of reddish soil, vegetation and water. At the same time, the idea of water is accentuated in the objects of tea drinking, represented by a teapot and two bowls. The significance of these objects is emphasized by their position – in the center of the composition against the background of blue clothes, in which a figure is dressed, symbolizing the element of water. In this regard, it is especially significant that a bowl of tea (water) is brought to the lips by a character whose color of clothes symbolizes the earth. That is, there is a semantic connection: water irrigates the earth. And then – the character occupying the entire right part of the canvas and dressed in a green chapan (robe), symbolizing vegetation and fertility, holds a ketmen in his hand. A compositionally linked triad is being formed: water gives life to the earth, the earth bears fruit, and this whole process is in the hands of the working dehkans working on the land of Uzbekistan.

 

M.I. Kurzin. The Red teahouse. The 1930s.The State Museum of Arts of Uzbekistan, Tashkent

M.I. Kurzin.

The Red teahouse. 1930s

Fine Arts Museum of Uzbekistan, TashkentThe symbolic structure of the "Teahouse with a portrait of Lenin" stands out against the background of thematically close works of both the artist himself ("Red Teahouse", 1933, Samarkand State Museum-Reserve) and his colleagues in the workshop – M.I. Kurzin ("Red Teahouse", 1930s, the State Museum of Arts of Uzbekistan, Tashkent; "Teahouse and house with a bridge", 1932, I.V. Savitsky State Museum of Arts of the Republic of Karakalpakstan); A.V. Nikolaeva (Usto Mumin) ("Red Teahouse", Mu?tum. 1933. No. 8), etc.

 

Kurzin played the theme of the red teahouse in his characteristic ironic manner, literally painting his sheets red. Nikolayev created refined graphic compositions, contrasting the old and new way of life. However, for the most part, such works recreate a specific situation, are filled with everyday details; they are "tied to the ground", while the "Teahouse with a portrait of Lenin" has a timeless character. In this picture, the objective world, devoid of any detail, complements the heroic image of the man-creator. A.N. Volkov, using exclusively formal artistic techniques (not counting the portrait of Lenin included in the work), conveys to the viewer not only the creative pathos of the Soviet power established in Uzbekistan, but also the idea of the greatness of a man capable of turning a desert into the blooming garden. Without slogans, banners, pathetic gestures. Subtly elegant, with unsurpassed skill. This ideological component is joined by a deeper symbolic layer, expressed both through a compositional and coloristic solution, and through objects-attributes placed on the canvas, which together testifies to the artist's brilliant knowledge of European and Eastern cultural traditions.

References
1. A. (1935, June 24). What artists will give for the 10th anniversary of Uzbekistan. Pravda Vostoka [Truth of the East], 144 (3804), 3.
2. A.P. (1933, December 10). At the republican art exhibition. Uzbekistanskaya Pravda [Truth of Uzbekistan], 284 (1584), 4.
3. Vinogradova, A., Boult, D., Volkov, V. (2007). Aleksandr Volkov. The Sun and The Caravan. Moscow: Slovo.
4. Taktash, R.H. (1982). Aleksandr Volkov. Album. Tashkent: Publishing house of literature and art named after Gafur Gulyam.
5. B-n A. (1923). The Exhibition – «Turkestan» – A.N. Volkov. Ogonek, 35, 18.
6. Bulgakov, M.A. (1995). Golden city // Collected works in ten volumes. V. 1. M.: Golos.
7. Volkov, A.N. (1933, December 15). To give bright and understandable pictures that correspond to the era. Uzbekistanskaya Pravda [Truth of Uzbekistan], 288 (1588), 3.
8. Gafiz (1927, April, 15). Artists of Central Asia. A.N. Volkov // 7 dnej [7 Days], 17, 7.
9. Zemskaya, M.I. (1975). Aleksandr Volkov: Master of “The Pomegranate Teahouse”. Moscow: Soviet Painter.
10. Abramova, N.M., Kedrin, V.N., Krukovskaya, S.M. (1957). Fine art of Soviet Uzbekistan. Essays on the history of painting, graphics, sculpture. Tashkent: State Publishing House of Fiction Literature of the UzSSR.
11. Myunc, M., Fahretdinova, D. (1976). Fine Arts of Uzbekistan. Tashkent: Publishing house of literature and art named after Gafur Gulyam.
12. Iras, I. (1936, February 4). Creative session of the artist Volkov. Pravda Vostoka [Truth of the East], 28 (3889), 4.
13. Rempel, L.I., Dolinskaya, V., Zahidov, P., Kadyrova, T. (1976). Art of Soviet Uzbekistan 1917–1972. Painting. Sculpture. Graphic arts. Arts and Crafts. Moscow: Soviet Painter.
14. Kozlovskaya, G.A. (1977). Memories of the artist Usto Mumin-Alexander Vasilyevich Nikolaev. Archives of Russian National Museum of Music, Moscow.
15. (1924, April 22). Red teahouse. Turkestanskaya Pravda [Truth of Turkestan], 90 (367), 3.
16. Volkov, V.A., Volkov, A.A, Volkov, A.A. (2007). Master of the "Pomegranate teahouse": painting, poetry, friends. Moscow: Newamed.
17. Nikiforov, B., Vejmarn, B. (1931, October 18). The walls of the "native quarters" are crumbling. Artists should participate more actively in the socialist reconstruction of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Sovetskoe iskusstvo [Soviet Art], 54 (125), 1.
18. Nikiforov, B.M. (1934). Painting by artists of Soviet Uzbekistan. Literaturnyj kritik [The literary critic], ¹ 11, 150–169.
19. Nikiforov, B.M., Vejmarn, B.V. (1932). Uzbekistan and Tajikistan in the struggle for proletarian art. Za proletarskoe iskusstvo [For proletarian art], 3, 12–15.
20. (1936, January 3). The Art Museum is open. At the painting by the artist Volkov. Pravda Vostoka [Truth of the East], 2 (3963), 4.
21. Sidorov A.A. (1923, November 17). New art exhibitions. Pravda [The Truth], 261, 5.
22. (1924). Turkestan painter A. Volkov. Iskusstvo i industriya [Art and industry], 1, 35–37.
23. Ufimcev, V.I. (1973). Talking about myself. M.: Soviet artist.
24. Filippovich, M. (1930). Through the eyes of an artist. Iskusstvo v massy [Art to the masses], 10–11, 38–39.
25. Shir, B. (1925, November 25). By artists' workshops. A. Volkov. 7 dnej [7 Days], 46 (98), 14.
26. U.K., N.P. (1933 January 30) Off-road assault. About the new painting by the artist Volkov. Pravda Vostoka [Truth of the East], 25 (3083), 4.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author submitted his article "A symbol in the shadow of an image: to the interpretation of one painting by Alexander Volkov" to the magazine "Culture and Art", in which the analysis of the artist's work "Teahouse with a portrait of Lenin" was carried out. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that the image of a teahouse is one of the most widespread in the visual arts of Central Asia. The teahouse is a vivid example of the national flavor embodied in traditional architecture and antique utensils, colorful carpets and guest clothes. However, as the author notes, the teahouse in Central Asian realities is a socio-cultural phenomenon whose role goes far beyond a place to relax and eat: It is a traditional place of communication, preservation and transmission of traditions. During the years of the formation of Soviet power in Central Asia, the teahouse began to be used as a component of the sphere of ideological propaganda (the "red teahouse"). Unfortunately, the article lacks an introduction in which material on the relevance and scientific novelty of the research should be presented, there is no information on the scientific validity of the problem. The purpose of the study is a compositional and symbolic analysis of the work of A.N. Volkov. The methodological basis of the research was an integrated approach, including socio-cultural analysis, as well as compositional and symbolic analysis of works of art. The author uses A.N. Volkov's painting "A Teahouse with a Portrait of Lenin" (1928) as an empirical base. The author explains the choice of the subject of the study by the fact that the symbolic structure of the "Teahouse with a portrait of Lenin" stands out against the background of thematically similar works by both the artist himself and his colleagues in the workshop. As the author states, one of the characteristic elements of the red tea houses were posters, drawings and paintings by artists designed to design a new way of life for workers and peasants. When a circle of young artists formed around A.N. Volkov, including N.G. Karakhan, U.T. Tansykbayev, P. Shchegolev, and others, one of their activities was the collective work on painting Soviet clubs and tea houses. In turn, the image of the red teahouse has firmly entered the repertoire of artists of the Soviet East, it can be found among the paintings and graphic works of such masters as A.V. Nikolaev, M.I. Kurzin, B.K. Hamdami, A. Tashkent, etc. A.N. Volkov, who was at the origins of the formation of the art school of Soviet Uzbekistan, has repeatedly addressed this topic. The author conducts a compositional and semiotic analysis of A.N. Volkov's painting "Teahouse with a portrait of Lenin". As the author notes, the idea of the painting is strictly verified, the location of the elements on the canvas is compositionally significant and justified: a portrait image of V.I. Lenin in the upper left corner, a peasant with an Uzbek farmer's tool in the foreground. The semantic load associated with the idea of creative work, according to the author, is enhanced by the background of the painting, which is interrupted by two rectangular openings with a view of the sunlit landscape under a narrow strip of blue cloudless sky. The components forming the landscape create a conventional image of a garden city, indicating a historical perspective, an opportunity to see the future and the result of labor. The author pays attention to the analysis of the color palette of the work, which also has not only an aesthetic, but also a semantic load: the artist uses a natural, characteristic of local nature color scheme, conveying shades of earth, greenery and water, symbols of the eternal rebirth of nature, one of the elements of which is a person who puts his work into its renewal. After conducting the research, the author comes to the conclusion that Alexander Volkov, using exclusively formal artistic techniques, managed to convey to the viewer not only the creative pathos of the Soviet government established in Uzbekistan, but also the idea of the greatness of a man capable of turning a desert into a blooming garden. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained suggest that the study of the artist's characteristic style and his perception of certain historical events is of undoubted scientific and practical cultural interest and deserves further study. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. This is also facilitated by an adequate choice of an appropriate methodological framework. The bibliography of the study consisted of 21 sources, but it does not contain modern scientific works devoted to the problem under study. The author fulfilled his goal, received certain scientific results that allowed him to summarize the material. It should be stated that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication after these shortcomings have been eliminated.