Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychologist
Reference:

The Influence of Anxiety on the Self-Regulation of Psychological Counseling Clients in a Situation of Uncertainty

Martyanova Galina Yurievna

PhD in Psychology

Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Moscow City Teachers Training University

129226, Russia, Moscow, 2nd agricultural passage, 4

martyanova94@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8701.2023.1.39796

EDN:

DIXHSG

Received:

11-02-2023


Published:

18-02-2023


Abstract: Experiencing anxiety in an uncertain event becomes a way of reacting that makes changes in coping processes, primarily disrupting conscious regulatory activity. The article presents the results of the analysis of the influence of anxiety on the parameters of the style of conscious self-regulation in a pandemic situation. The study is based on the provisions of the theory of conscious self-regulation by O. A. Konopkin. The study involved psychological counseling clients who voluntarily seek help. Anxiety was studied by its types, the diagnosis of the style parameters of self–regulation was carried out using the technique "Style of self-regulation of behavior - SSP" by V. I. Morosanova. The effect of anxiety on self-regulation was determined by regression analysis. The results indicated the equivalent severity of the types of anxiety: personal, situational, subclinical. A significant result of the study was the fact of the anxiety of the subjects about the regression of psychotherapeutic skills in a situation of uncertainty. The analysis of the style parameters of self-regulation showed violations in the structure of activity planning, modeling conditions, building action programs and evaluating the results obtained. Regression models indicated differentiated determination by types of anxiety of regulatory blocks. These studies allow us to expand our understanding of the violated ways of responding to psychological counseling clients in stressful situations. The results can be used in the development of the psychotechnical component of the process of providing assistance to the subjects of a situation of uncertainty.


Keywords:

anxiety, self-regulation, situation of uncertainty, psychological counseling, self-regulatory style, personal anxiety, reactive anxiety, goal setting, behavior model, tolerance for uncertainty

This article is automatically translated.

IntroductionModern crises of a person's political, socio-economic and cultural life inevitably lead to increased uncertainty, when not only the understanding of situational potential narrows, but also the expectation of a negative development of events increases.

The structure of the situation is a system of relations between external and internal conditions in relation to the subject, when the balance of which is disturbed, tension arises that requires additional purposeful activity. Reducing tension reduces the degree of difficulty of the situation and characterizes it with the parameters of adaptive activity, in the opposite case, if it is impossible to reduce tension, maladaptive coping causes a symptom complex of negative experiences, which in turn determines violations already in the integral system of subjective self-regulation [6]. The situation of uncertainty initially has an undifferentiated causal regulation of both external and internal activity, so the state of anxiety as a response is natural in it. This is particularly indicated by the results of most studies of anxiety during the coronavirus pandemic conducted in Russia and abroad. [1, 3, 5, 10, 12].

Any context of anxiety research should justify the possibility of applying the acquired knowledge in a specific practical field. Our interest in the stated problem is connected with the development of a subject-regulatory approach to psychological counseling, where the genesis of the problem is considered as a complex process of establishing subjective-evaluative causal relationships of events and facts, which is reflected through cognitive, emotional and behavioral attitudes to reality [7].

The subject of the situation directs his activity to the regulation of uncertainty not so much in the external, objectively acting reality, as in the internal one. The anxious experience of uncertainty is a consistent set of unpleasant physiological symptoms caused by one's own cognitions and confirmed by relevant external information [11]. It is believed that such anxiety is explained by the tendency to misinterpret normal physiological symptoms in the absence of any actual diseases and increase them when assessing the situation as tense [3]. Therefore, it is important for us to find out how the experience of anxiety regulates subjective situational activity, on the basis of which it will be possible to form assistance and self-help programs.

In this study, we rely on the provisions of O. A. Konopkin's theory of self-regulation of voluntary activity [4], where conscious self-regulation is considered as a condition for coordination of various mental subsystems and as a mechanism for reflection of one's own activity for adaptation to environmental conditions [2]

The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of anxiety on the conscious self–regulation of psychological counseling clients in a modern situation of uncertainty.

MethodsThe study was conducted between April and December 2022.

The subjects were psychological counseling clients presenting the problem of increasing anxiety in a situation of uncertainty arising under the influence of socio-economic and political events in Russia. The main content of the subjects' requests for help was associated with regression of anxiety coping skills, and seeking help was assessed as an opportunity and desire to reduce anxiety at the expense of their own resources. A sign of the representativeness of the sample was the condition of their absence of borderline and pathological affective disorders. A total of 94 people participated in the study, 54 of them women and 40 men. The age of the subjects is 29-46 years. The subjects are Russian-speaking, live in Moscow and the Moscow region, St. Petersburg, Voronezh, Yekaterinburg, Kazan, Nizhny Novgorod, Samara, Tula. All the subjects received counseling and filled out questionnaires online.

The criteria for assessing the condition of the subjects were: 1 – the level of tolerance to uncertainty as a result of assessing a stressful life situation, 2 – the level of personal anxiety as the basis of negative dynamics of anxiety, 3 – the level of situational anxiety as a factor of situational response, 4 – the somatic level of anxiety manifestation. The survey of the subjects was conducted by psychological consultants at the initial stage of counseling.

The S. Badner questionnaire modified by T. V. Kornilova was used to study tolerance and intolerance to uncertainty, the Spielberger–Khanin scale (STAI) and the hospital anxiety scale (HADS) were used to analyze the level and severity of anxiety. Conscious self–regulation was studied by the method "Style of self-regulation of behavior - SSP" by V. I. Morosanova. This technique allows you to study the general level of self-regulation and its main stylistic components: planning, modeling, programming and evaluation of the result.

Data processing was carried out in the SPSS Statistics 23.0 program.

Research resultsThe comparison of types of anxiety and parameters of self-regulation in the subjects was carried out according to the average values.

The primary empirical data are presented in table 1.

Table 1. Average values of anxiety severity, tolerance to uncertainty and self-regulation in the subjects

Parameter

Average value

Standard deviation

F

Type of alarm

Reactive Anxiety (STAI)

48,09

2,51

12,64

Personal Anxiety (STAI)

45,99

2,61

6,99

Subclinical Anxiety (HADS)

8,73

1,57

8,63

Tolerance to uncertainty

21,25

3,45

8,70

Components of the style of conscious self-regulation

Planning

4,38

0,91

18,93

Programming

5,49

0,91

17,48

Modeling

5,55

0,91

14,25

Evaluation of the result

4,93

0,90

8,70

Note: when p =0.00

The average values of the anxiety questionnaire scales show the presence of high values of reactive and personal anxiety according to STAI, a subclinical level of anxiety according to HADS and low indicators of tolerance to uncertainty. At the same time, each alarm parameter has close links with tolerance to uncertainty, showing that the lower the tolerance to uncertainty, the higher the alarm value. The correlation of reactive anxiety with tolerance is -0.472 at p =0.000, personal anxiety with tolerance is -0.337 at p =0.001 and subclinical anxiety is -0.387 at p =0.000. Correlations prove that the cognitive assessment of the situation as uncertain depends on the severity of the subject's anxiety.

The average value of the general level of the style of conscious self–regulation is 20.35, which corresponds to low indicators according to the method "Style of self–regulation of behavior - SSP" by V. I. Morosanova. The subjects also demonstrate reduced values for the main blocks of conscious self-regulation: planning (4.38), programming (5.49), modeling (5.55) and evaluation of results (4.93). Low planning values indicate the instability of the proposed goals and their dependence on the mood and general condition of the person. Modeling indicators indicate that the ideas about how to achieve the goal are developed in the subjects, but together with low planning values, they are constantly changing, causing internal doubt. An insufficient degree of awareness is also observed when building programs for their actions. The evaluation of the results is adequate, but does not contribute to the correction of the selected programs and conditions of activity. In general, we can say that the need for self-conscious self-management has been formed, but its implementation depends on the content and strength of the situation in which a person finds himself. At the same time, the possibility of regulatory compensation of negative external and internal influences is also reduced, which does not allow optimal adaptation to the situation.

To test the hypothesis about the influence of anxiety on the parameters of conscious self-regulation, regression models were built for each block of self-regulation. The data of the correlation and regression analysis are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Predictors of conscious self-regulation (data from correlation and regression analysis)

 

Planning

Programming

Modeling

Evaluation of the result

r

?

r

?

r

?

r

?

Personal anxiety

-0,452

-0,164

-0,549

-0,372

-0,521

-0,315

-0,384

-0,259

Reactive anxiety

-0,546

-0,411

-0,492

-0,308

-0,408

-0,178

-0,396

-0,319

Subclinical anxiety

-0,438

-0,228

-0,441

-0,227

-0,410

-0,185

-0,304

-0,151

Model statistics

R=0,631

R2 = 0,399

F – 8,143

R=0,655

R2 = 0,429

F – 9,223

R=0,605

R2 = 0,366

F – 7,081

R=0,519

R2 = 0,269

F – 4,521

All models are statistically significant. In the "Planning" model, the correlation coefficients are negative (from -0.438 to -0.546). The more, therefore, a person worries, the weaker his processes of setting and accepting his own goals. Determining the activity of regulating conscious goals are reactive anxiety in a situation of uncertainty (?= -0.411) and subclinical anxiety (?= -0.228). A negative relationship between variables is also noted in the "Programming" model. The construction of action programs in a situation of uncertainty is influenced by all three parameters: personal anxiety (?= -0.372), reactive anxiety (?= -0.308) and subclinical anxiety (?= -0.227). Personal anxiety (-0.521), subclinical anxiety (-0.410) and reactive anxiety (-0.408) also demonstrate a confident negative relationship with "Modeling". The main predictor of violation of regulatory activity in this model is personal anxiety (?= -0.315). The "Evaluation of results" model is characterized by the lowest correlation indicators (from -0.304 to -0.384). Reactive anxiety (?= -0.319) and personal anxiety (?= -0.259) most of all determine violations in the evaluation of their actions.

Considering separately the predictors of the regulatory activity of the subjects, we can note their unequal influence on the blocks of conscious self-regulation. Thus, the personal level of anxiety response to a situation of uncertainty does not significantly affect the processes of goal setting, but determines the conditions and programs of action in a situation of uncertainty and their assessment. While situational anxiety is a predictor of planning, programming and evaluation of the result. The level of subclinical anxiety primarily determines planning and programming.

Discussion of the resultsThe distribution of average values by types of anxiety allows us to present it as a single symptom complex of experience in a situation of uncertainty, within which different components of anxiety determine regulatory activity in different ways.

The personal level of anxiety response can be considered as a relatively stable education, the basis for assessing the situation as uncertain. It is this disturbing reason that does not allow us to adapt our own regulatory models to the life situation. The reactive level is responsible for the assessment and attitude of the subject to specific event conditions and affects the setting of goals in current situations. Subclinical anxiety acts as an indicator of psychophysiological well-being, which in turn records violations of regulatory activity, and above all in the planning and programming processes.

Anxiety caused by the impossibility of obtaining objective knowledge reflects the basic modality of the situation – uncertainty. Its importance for self-regulation directly depends on the amount and content of information. Control, in turn, determines the internal stability of the situation to which it becomes possible to adapt. The subjects, being clients of psychological counseling, initially have an increased level of personal anxiety. The excess of an anxious situational response in a specific event can be considered as a regression of skills previously developed in psychotherapy, correction and counseling. We believe that this is a sign of a violation of regulatory activity in a difficult life situation. We can explain the return to the disturbed response by the absence or limitation of the ability to apply the acquired skills in a situational context due to the high degree of uncertainty of the event. In addition, such a regression is supported by a system of self-concepts as a subject in whose experience there is a problematic regulation of activity. When the tension of the situation increases, it is this reflexive experience that turns out to be stronger than the new skill.

Low values of the general style of self-regulation and reduced indicators of planning, modeling, programming and evaluation of results indicate a violation of adaptation. The uncertainty of the situation does not allow us to keep the accepted goals, identify optimal conditions for activity, build action programs, evaluate the result and make adjustments. The external regulation of the situation turns out to be stronger than the internal one, information is more important than one's own judgments and conclusions, psychological defenses are brighter than arbitrary coping.

The main process in an integrated system of self–regulation is planning. It is around the setting and acceptance of a conscious goal that the entire system of self-regulation is organized. The dependence of planning on anxiety determines the hierarchy of subsequent regulatory violations: from unconstructive goal-setting to a distorted assessment of arbitrary activity. According to regression analysis, programming is the most vulnerable: an increased anxiety background distorts behavioral activity. When the external eventfulness is in constant uncontrolled dynamics, it becomes unclear what actions will be effective and what result will satisfy the situation itself. Anxiety, therefore, acts as an indicator of intolerance to the uncertainty of the situation. Intolerance to uncertainty is a tendency to experience uncontrolled elements of a situation in the absence of confidence that the result of these elements will be unambiguously negative [13]. The data of Freeston, Tiplady, Mawn, Bottesi, & Thwaites on the types of behavior of people in a pandemic situation can be a confirmation of our result on the connection of experiencing uncertainty with programming. The authors distinguish among others the following unconstructive behavioral strategies used to reduce anxiety: attempts in various ways to achieve certainty in uncertain situations and thereby reduce one's own state of uncertainty; motivated avoidance of uncertainty; impulsive behavior aimed at immediately eliminating the uncertainty of the result; hesitation and doubt in choosing behavioral strategies and constant switching between them [12]. In our opinion, these and other behavioral strategies allow us to occasionally reduce anxiety tension, but do not contribute to compensating for the entire regulatory style.

The parameters of self-regulation can change for the same person depending on how he perceives the situation: difficult or simple, pleasant or unpleasant, resource-based or uncompromising. The subject correlates the assessment and objective requirements of the situation, determining for himself the conditions for achieving the goal, forms and methods of controlling the result. Since uncertainty violates the objectivity of the perception of the situation, modeling as a conscious regulatory mechanism becomes narrow: activity is directed only to making decisions about coping with uncertainty. The alarm functionality is ambivalent at the same time. On the one hand, it reinforces the perception of the need to cope with the uncertainty of the situation, and on the other, it raises doubts and uncertainty about the independence of the developed models. Most often, this contradiction determines the reason for seeking psychological help.

ConclusionSummarizing the research data, we define anxiety in a situation of uncertainty as a predictor of the regulatory activity of psychological counseling clients.

Its influence explains violations in the system of planning, modeling, programming of its activities and in evaluating the results obtained. The emotionally disturbing reflection of the situation as uncertain and the cognitive assessment of oneself in it necessitates the organization of assistance aimed at correcting the system of conscious self-regulation.

The results obtained seem to us sufficient for the subsequent development of techniques for restructuring cognitive response to the stimuli of the situation, namely, increasing competence by independently limiting the structural elements of the situation and giving them a specific meaning. We also believe that increasing tolerance to uncertainty will become a condition for reducing anxiety, against which our own coping models will be perceived as appropriate to achieve the goal, and behavior programs will include elements of creative processing of information.

References
1. Alekhin, A. N., & Dubinina, E. A. (2020). Pandemic: The view of a clinical psychologist. Arterial Hypertension, 26 (3), 312–316. doi:10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-3-312-316
2. Banshchikova, T. N., & Morosanova, V. I. (2019). The relationship between conscious self-regulation and socio-cultural adaptation of foreign students. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 6 (7), 50. https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/61PSMN619
3. Grebnyak, O. V., & Novozhenina, O. P. (2022). The structure of social anxiety in Russian society: gender emphasis. Science. Culture. Society, 28 (52), 24–35. doi.org/10.19181/nko.2022.28.2S.2
4. Konopkin, O. A. (2008). Conscious self-regulation as a criterion of subjectness. Voprosy Psychologii, 3, 22–34.
5. Kryukova, T. L., Ekimchik, O. A., Opekina, T. P., & Shipova, N. S. (2020). Stress and coping in a self-isolated family during covid-19 pandemic. Social psychology and society, 11 (4), 120–134. doi: 10.17759/sps.2020110409
6. Martyanova, G. Yu. (2014). The Dynamics of the Regulatory Activity of the Subject in a Difficult Situation. St. Tikhon's University Review. Series IV: Pedagogy. Psychology, 3 (34), 122–132. doi: 10.15382/sturIV201434.122-132
7. Martyanova, G. Yu. (2016). Self-determination of the subject of a tense situation: an anthropopsychological approach. Psychology and psychotechnics, 10 (97), 829–833. doi: 10.7256/2454-0722.2016.10.22070
8. Pavlova, E. M., & Kornilova, T. V. (2019). The Role of the Triad of Traits “Tolerance for Uncertainty – Emotional Intelligence – Intuition” in Self-Assessed Creativity in Creative Professionals. Psychological-Educational Studies, 11 (1), 107–117. doi: 10.17759/psyedu.2019110109
9. Salihova, A. B. (2020). Value bases of individual tolerance to uncertainty. Herald of Vyatka State University, 2 (136), 132–141. doi: 10.25730/VSU.7606.20.032
10. Sorokin, M. Yu., Kasyanov, E. D., Rukavishnikov, G. V., Makarevich, O. V., Neznanov, N. G., Lutova, N. B., & Mazo, G. E. (2020). Structure of anxiety associated with ñovid-19 pandemic: the online survey results. Bulletin of Russian State Medical University, 3, 70-76. doi: 10.24075/vrgmu.2020.030
11. Asmundson, G., Paluszek, M. M., Landry, C. A., Rachor, G. S., McKay, D., & Taylor, S. (2020). Do pre-existing anxiety-related and mood disorders differentially impact COVID-19 stress responses and coping? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102271. doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102271
12. Freeston, M., Tiplady, A., Mawn, L., Bottesi, G., & Thwaites, S. (2020). Towards a model of uncertainty distress in the context of Coronavirus (COVID-19). The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist,13, e 31, 1–15. doi:10.1017/S1754470X2000029X
13. Sankar, R., Robinson, L., Honey, E., & Freeston, M. H. (2017). ‘We know intolerance of uncertainty is a transdiagnostic factor but we don’t know what it looks like in everyday life’: a systematic review of intolerance of uncertainty behaviours. Clinical Psychology Forum, 296, 10–15.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review of the article "The effect of anxiety on the self-regulation of psychological counseling clients in a situation of uncertainty" The subject of the study has not been stated by the author. But it is reflected in the purpose of the study - to determine the effect of anxiety on the conscious self-regulation of psychological counseling clients in a modern situation of uncertainty. The title of the article clearly reflects the essence of the work. The research methodology is based on traditional methods of psychological research. In the first part, methods of analysis, systematization and generalization of literary data are applied, and a review of 13 literary sources is used. The author relies mainly on the provisions of O. A. Konopkin's theory of self-regulation of voluntary activity. The empirical part of the study is represented by a study of a sample of 94 people, 54 of them women and 40 men. The age of the subjects is 29-46 years old. The unifying factor for the subjects is that they are all clients of psychological counseling who present the problem of increasing anxiety in a situation of uncertainty arising under the influence of socio-economic and political events in Russia. The description of the group according to the selection criteria is presented in detail in the article. The study uses various methods: ? S. Badner questionnaire modified by T. V. Kornilova, ? Spielberger-Khanin scale (STAI) ? hospital anxiety scale (HADS) ? "Style of self–regulation of behavior - SSP" by V. I. Morosanova. Quantitative methods were used in the study, which makes it possible to assess the scientific and reliability of the data obtained. So, the author uses the analysis of averages, standard deviation, correlation and regression analysis. Data processing was carried out in the SPSS Statistics 23.0 program. The relevance of the presented article is beyond doubt. Interest in studying the individual characteristics of experiencing stress has traditionally been high in psychological science. In recent years, due to various crises (political, economic, social, etc.), uncertainty factors have formed an appropriate environment for increasing stress. In relation to the new conditions of turbulence of the external environment, the methods of stress management widely used in psychology have ceased to be effective. In connection with the above-mentioned points, research in this field is of high theoretical and applied interest today. Scientific novelty – the author has not stated the parameters of scientific novelty. In the article itself, it is indirectly traced in connection with the use of traditional psychological methods in new conditions and in connection with new tasks (stress assessment of subjects experiencing the situation in the world and Russia). But due to the stated topic, the article has a more applied character than a scientific one. Style, structure, content The article has a traditional structure – introductory, main and final parts. The introductory part justifies the choice of the topic. It has an average level of elaboration. The main part of the article presents work on the goal of determining the impact of anxiety on the conscious self-regulation of psychological counseling clients in a modern situation of uncertainty. The author analyzes the average values of anxiety severity, tolerance to uncertainty and self-regulation in the subjects, and also compares predictors of conscious self-regulation. Based on the quantitative analysis data, competent conclusions have been drawn. For example, the author has determined that anxiety is a single symptom complex of experiencing in a situation of uncertainty, within which different components of anxiety determine regulatory activity in different ways. It was also found that the main process in an integrated system of self–regulation is planning. In conclusion, the author draws conclusions about the results obtained. It would be possible to increase the effectiveness of the conducted research with recommendations on how to integrate the results obtained into the practical work of psychologists in counseling clients with similar requests. But this recommendation does not detract from the value of the presented research. The style of presentation is accessible to perception. The article contains tables that illustrate the results of the study, including grouping variables. The style of the article meets the requirements of science. It is designed correctly, without significant violations. The bibliography includes 13 literary sources, including editions in English. Among the literary sources are monographs, articles, classical publications, collections of conference materials. They are dated from different periods, including 2019-22. It is important that the list of references contains a large number of the most relevant sources, including those covering stress issues during the pandemic. The list is designed in accordance with the requirements for publications. This list of references can be considered as a selection of sources on the stated topic. Appeal to opponents – the article can be recommended for publication. It would be interesting to see the continuation of the study. Conclusions, the interest of the readership – the article will arouse the interest of the readership – educators, clinical psychologists, researchers, psychology teachers.