Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Conflict Studies / nota bene
Reference:

Moral and ethical aspects of the activities of private military companies. Part 2.

Sokolov Roman

ORCID: 0000-0002-8626-5629

Student, Research assistant, International Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory "Study of global and Regional socio-political processes", Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N.A. Dobrolyubov.

603095, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Minina, 31a

romasokolov777@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 
Melnikov Anton

ORCID: 0000-0002-9906-1887

Student of Foreign Regional Studies (Chinese), Department of International Relations and World Politics, Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N. A. Dobrolyubova

603000, Russia, Nizhny Novgorod region, Nizhny Novgorod, 31a Minina str., office 1411

antonmelnikov2003@gmail.com
Ryzhov Igor'

Doctor of History

Associate Professor, Head of the Department of History and Politics of Russia, N.I. Lobachevsky National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University; Senior Researcher, International Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory "Study of World and Socio-Political Processes", Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N.A. Dobrolyubov (NGLU)

603155, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Ul. Ul'yanova, 2

ivr@fmo.unn.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Rogozhina Evgeniya Mikhailovna

ORCID: 0000-0003-3515-2699

PhD in Politics

Associate Professor, Department of International Relations and World Political Processes, Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N.A. Dobrolyubov

603155, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Minina, 31a

evgenia-amiga@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0617.2023.4.39632

EDN:

PXPVRW

Received:

18-01-2023


Published:

15-01-2024


Abstract: As part of the continuation of the study of the moral and ethical aspects of the activities of private military companies, the authors in this work study the internal factors of PMC activities that form their perception by society. The work becomes particularly relevant in the context of the special military operation of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, where, according to official media reports, private military companies of Russia played a significant role in achieving the goals of the SVO. The rhetoric of the media about PMC fighters on the side of Russia changed to the opposite after the demarche of PMC "Wagner". The focus of this study is made on the causes and patterns in the operational activities of PMC concerning the formation of a staff to the use of various tactics of armed operations, which are the greatest triggers of negative perception. The research methodology is based on a systematic approach that allows to fully explore the directions of the relationship between individual criteria in recruitment, management methods and principles in the activities of PMCs and their representation in the public consciousness. Content analysis of publications in the media and social networks was used as a basis for the study of public perception. The consideration of private military companies from the point of view of their corporate culture is unique. The image of the company is formed by its actions and those who work for it and those for whom they work. The authors establish a system of relationships between these factors and the attitude to these companies on the part of society, systematize the directions of influence of these factors and draw a general and private conclusion about what role they play and how to reduce negative manifestations.


Keywords:

Private military and security companies, Middle East, the USA, international law, regional subsystems, public opinion, public media, security market, peace building, international humanitarian law

This article is automatically translated.

 

Introduction

 Private military companies (PMCs)  They exist not only on the battlefields, but also in the public space. Many PMCs actively blog on social networks, articles about their activities are published in military magazines and the media. The recent example of the activities of PMCs Wagner in Ukraine as part of a special military operation of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation clearly proves how changing rhetoric from the media can change the track of the company's development and seriously affect the decision of potential customers. In the private military industry, the attitude of society towards each particular company plays a role more than in any other field, because reputation is what determines the availability of new orders and, consequently, the survival of a company in a highly competitive military services market.  Only the "gray sector" of military services is not so demanding of a neutral or positive perception of society, since their pool of clients consists of non-legitimate actors [1], however, even for such private military companies, reputation has weight. 

 

            What shapes the image of private military companies, and therefore determines their development? external factors certainly include their operational activities, which are actively published in the media and on social media accounts, but in addition internal factors also play an important role. The authors identify two main factors:   Characteristics of Employees of Private military companies and clients of PMCs. 

         Employees of Private military companies represent the general mass of former military personnel, military specialists of the active army, who are attracted as consultants or banally outbid with higher salaries, and in recent years the number of criminals, including the military, as well as former child soldiers, has been increasing. [2]

            As for customers, the private military industry has one of the privileges that nation states do not have — to choose their customers. Whether it is the supply of weapons or the conduct of an armed operation, PMCs can, based on international corporate law, as well as on national legislation, accept or refuse customers. This situation makes the customer factor internal to the PMCs, since the final decision in conditions of a shortage of supply in the market of private military services[3] is made by the management of a private military company. At the same time, the clients themselves can put forward certain requirements for the methods and methods of conducting military operations, but the final decision for their application still lies with the command staff of the PMCs.  Note that if the relationship between the quality of PMCs' workforce and media publications about their activities seems obvious (although not proven), then the choice of customers and the opinion of society about a particular company is not directly dependent. 

         Based on the above, the authors formulate the purpose of the study as follows: to systematize the internal factors of the activities of private military companies and establish a correspondence between them and the public opinion formed under their influence towards PMCs and the industry as a whole.

         To achieve this goal, the authors apply a wide range of methodological tools: a systematic approach is used to study the structure of the personnel of private military companies and establish the relationship between the operational activities of PMCs and the state of personnel. General scientific methods of analysis and synthesis helped the authors to form a list of criteria relevant to the selection of an employee in the PMCs mission. The historical method and methods of event analysis in the context of internal factors made it possible to determine in many ways the reasons for the participation of PMCs in various missions, as well as the social and political consequences of such participation for private military companies.

 

Employees of Private military companies

 

            Within the framework of this study, the authors analyze the characteristics of the workforce of private military companies, formulate criteria for their selection, analyze the interdependence between the activities of PMCs employees, their past and biography, the pattern of military operations and how PMCs are perceived by society through the prism of mass media and publications on social networks. For the purposes of this study, the authors conducted their own study of public opinion among young people and middle-aged people, the results of which correlate with national and global trends and patterns of evaluation of PMCs in the media [14]. Thanks to the work carried out, it becomes possible to determine which events and features of the biography of PMCs employees have the most negative impact on the public's perception of the company's activities, however, at the beginning, it is necessary to establish which characteristics of a potential candidate are most in demand for companies in the military sector themselves. 

   

         The authors analyzed more than 300 profiles of employees of private military companies affiliated with Russia and Western countries, and also used data from open sources in the form of reports from the United Nations and other international organizations in order to form an image of an ideal candidate for service in a Private military company. Note that depending on the specialization of the PMCs, key military skills vary, but it is possible to make a general, average portrait. 

            Separately, we will make a reservation that in this study the authors focused their attention on ordinary employees of PMCs, without considering the top management staff, as well as administrative staff. These employees rarely have a significant impact on the public perception of individual PMCs, since their names are protected by corporate secrecy and, as practice has shown, they practically do not initiate the commission of war crimes or other serious violations of international law in the field of warfare and the circulation of weapons. Military contractors of the white and gray zones prefer to work in a legal or semi-legal legal field. For them, violations of IHL are a deviation from the rules and a serious blow to their reputation, which the command staff does not intend to allow. The authors have not established reliable data on systematic and deliberate crimes against human rights by major market players. This is due to the fact that in conditions of armed conflict, access to the media and military specialists is limited, the objectivity of their data raises questions, and the original information is classified in the archives of the States parties to the conflict (albeit indirectly).[4]

            The operational staff of the PMCs are precisely those people who determine the image of the company in the mass consciousness, since it is their actions that are evaluated by society, their photos are published in the media and social networks. networks. They are the focus of this study.  

 

 

 

         As a result of the analysis of the profile of operational employees of Private military companies, the authors identified the most frequent and sought-after characteristics that determine the hiring of a potential candidate:  

 

1) experience in conducting military operations - for both command staff and operatives, experience plays a key role. Knowledge of warfare tactics, adaptability to discipline and drill, knowledge of weapons—all this reduces the cost of PMCs for training, which means maximizes profits and increases the efficiency of the unit. 

2)          Low cost of services - after the collapse of the USSR, many commanders and soldiers joined the PMCs or organized their own. The cost of services provided by former Soviet citizens is much lower than that of US Army soldiers. [3] Given the active activity of the USSR in Afghanistan, such candidates have more than enough combat experience.  

3)          The presence of specific knowledge - experience in counter-terrorism activities, knowledge of the area of the operation, the ability to repair and maintain certain types of weapons, especially old Soviet equipment - skills that are extremely in demand in the market of private military services. They not only reduce the cost of the mission, but also allow you to offer exclusive services. 

4)          Effectiveness. Regardless of the past, piece specialists are highly valued in the labor market of the military industry. The more effectively a person is able to perform combat missions, the more in demand and highly paid he is. It is more profitable for PMCs to keep expensive professionals than to spend time and money on the selection of low-skilled personnel, who most likely will not be able to serve even a year. 

 

Thus, the portrait of an ideal candidate for a job in PMCs looks like this: a man over 18 years old, athletic, with combat experience or with a sought-after military specialty, single or has adult children, does not have stable social attachments, is not afraid of poor social conditions, is able to use weapons to achieve their goals. 

 

            In general, the portrait of a PMCs employee in the mass consciousness of Western countries, as well as in Russia before the start of the SVO, looked about the same way. Despite the active propaganda of the PMCs' activities in the Western media in a negative way (in the early 1990s, the image of a "stupid man with a gun in his hands, ready at any moment to plunder a settlement or commit violence against the local population"[1]"), PMCs operatives are not perceived by society as something unambiguously "bad". On the contrary, when analyzing the German and American media, in the context before and after the SVO, the authors found that PMCs operatives are an army in the service of states that helps to cope with the "bad guys" in the Middle East, in Iran. They train Ukrainian soldiers because Western countries cannot provide direct support.[16] These judgments, however, relate directly to the players of the "white" market of military services. 

            If we consider the gray market of military services, then the situation is diametrically opposite. PMCs working with illegitimate regimes are criticized for their activities, their connection with "incomprehensible personalities", and the main argument for criticism is the participation of former child soldiers, war criminals and people from recent conflicts, whose history and biography is not a role model. 

            In summary, the assessment of the activities of a Private Military Company depends directly on the context in which these companies exist and fulfill their contracts. Society tends not to perceive negatively the participation of certain persons in conducting a military operation when it comes to protecting the national interests of the country (provided that PMCs operatives are not directly or indirectly involved in illegal activities), however, in the case of controversial situations or existence in the gray zone of the market, the past of operatives determines the attitude of society to a military company and hence her reputation. 

Considering that often those who, for some reason, can no longer carry out public service go to PMCs. The reasons may be different in the spectrum from excessive service (by length of service) before war crimes and betrayal.[4] This dependence is not surprising. 

The authors quote Doug Brooks, the leader of the PMCs lobbyist group in the US Congress: "The best PMCs employees are often not the nicest guys, absolutely not the ones your sister should marry."[5]

         Indicative in this regard is the analysis of the public opinion of Russian citizens regarding the company PMCs Wagner in the context of a Special Military Operation of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine. At first, the employees of the Wagner PMCs in the official media and social networks were called natives of the former Soviet republics with extensive combat experience on the African continent. Since PMC Wagner was on the side of the Russian Armed Forces, the public did not have a negative attitude towards their activities. According to the author's public opinion research, only 7% of respondents (the sample consisted of about 450 people, mainly with higher education, middle age and youth), believed that the role of PMCs Wagner in achieving its goals was insignificant, and the company's activities were interpreted by respondents in a negative way. With the introduction of the program for concluding contracts between Wagner and convicts, including for serious crimes, the indicator of negative attitude towards PMCs increased to 35%, however, due to the correct interpretation in the media, which consists in the fact that criminals compensate in this way for their offenses to society (especially in the context of mobilization, which caused a feeling of fear among a significant part of the young population), the level of negative attitude of the company has stabilized at around 11%. Further developments, namely the demarche of the operatives of the Wagner PMCs, caused mass discontent in society, condemnation of the involvement of convicts in this company, which became one of the catalysts of outrage. Thus, 75% of respondents already had a negative attitude towards this PMCs. The authors do not consider it possible to extrapolate this study to all Russian citizens, since the sample is not large enough. It should be noted, however, that it clearly demonstrates the relationship between the operational staff of the PMCs and the perception of the company in society. 

            This case demonstrates another line of relationship—the relationship between the image of PMCs and the customer. Since PMC Wagner acted on the side of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation before its demarche, the state media system was able to competently explain to the public the reasons for the presence of such a group of operatives as former convicts. Moreover, the active disclosure of the details of PMC Wagner's activities in the media contributed to the formation of a positive perception of the Company in society and the prospects for cooperation with it.

            Thus, the authors move on to the second facet of the internal state of PMCs as clients. 

 

Customers of private military services.

 

         One of the business problems of private military companies from the point of view of public opinion is the clients of private military companies. 

 

         The private military industry is practically not limited by legislation in the field of customer choice. However, there is a practice of "cooperation" with the governments of the PMCs registration states, and refusal to provide services to those customers who threaten these governments. 

In some States:  The United States and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland require a special government license to fulfill orders in the interests of non-state actors. 

In practice, this does not prevent openly or secretly supplying armed opposition groups with intelligence and technical means of conducting military operations. Formal and non-formal control over the actions of PMCs by the country of registration, coupled with existing market laws, should, according to industry lobbyists, reduce the level of irresponsible behavior of PMCs, ensure the unity of state policy and PMCs.

 

         Reality shows us a different trend . Sandline's intention to sign a contract to work in the interests of the Kosovo Liberation Army (an Albanian militant group that was subsequently involved in a number of crimes against human rights) led to consultations with the British government and calls from the British Foreign Office, which managed to disrupt contract negotiations.  This event was actively discussed in the media, thanks to which Sandline's reputation as a white PMCs was undermined. Another example is the request for a license to organize military assistance to a crumbling regime   Mobutu Sese Seko[8] by MPRI in 1997, which they were denied by the US State Department. [8] Developed independent media also had a hand in destroying the reputation of MPRI, which led to its reorganization in the early 00s.

 

         On the one hand, PMCs are completely private companies, even if they are engaged in work traditionally associated with the activities of states. PMCs may not be required to adhere to a uniform policy with the State unless this is provided for by the laws of the country of registration or the terms of the contract. 

The moral and ethical side of the issue of helping the "enemies" or "enemies" of the state is quite relevant, which should lead to the prohibition of such "gray" activities. There are some problems with this: how and how to create a blacklist of customers in the private military services market? Will this be a worldwide list? how to oblige PMCs not to cooperate with such customers, provided that there are several dozen countries in Asia, Africa and Oceania that are ready to accept any PMCs, wanting only to receive tax deductions?

 

         The question of the legality of some groups raises questions. There is no globally recognized list of terrorist/extremist groups, because various non-State armed actors are classified differently in different countries. One of the striking examples is the Hamas movement, with whose representative in Moscow a high-level meeting was held on March 2, 2020.[9] This movement does not belong to rebel, terrorist or extremist formations in Russia, but is classified as such in the State of Israel. There are many examples of different attitudes of States towards some armed groups, which raises a logical question. If PMCs legislatively restrict the ability to work with those non-state actors that are classified by the country of registration as a threat to national and world security (such as terrorist and quasi-terrorist organizations, extremist groups, dictatorial regimes and states that systematically violate human rights and international humanitarian law in general, etc.)[10], then what can become an obstacle to the change of jurisdiction by a private military company by opening a subsidiary, branch, re-registration? In this case, the laws of the country of the first registration will no longer have effect on PMCs and a lucrative contract, even with a less "kind" customer, can be obtained and executed. The laws in this case turn out to be ineffective.

 

         Airscan and Ronco sent military goods, including military equipment and ammunition to the Sudan People's Liberation Army and the Patriotic Front of Rwanda, in direct violation of U.S. laws prohibiting any assistance to these non-state armed authors. The NFD company provided armed support to the governments of both Libya and Sudan, although legislation still in force prohibiting support to these governments both in the Republic of South Africa (the place of registration of the NFD company) and in the United States. [5] Spearhead LTD. She worked for drug cartels in Colombia, which was exactly at odds with Israel's political line.At the same time, the president of this company was an active lieutenant colonel of the Israeli Army in reserve.[9]

 

         Nevertheless, the Governments of the member States of PMCs often make concessions, especially in the regions of their national interest. The example of the MPRI company in Equatorial Guinea is illustrative. It took the company 2 years of lobbying to obtain a license from the US government to conduct a military operation in Guinea, and the decisive argument was the fear of the American government that the giant of the industry, the American PMCs, would lose the contract in the area of American interests. In this case, the open work of an American firm for the infamous dictatorship associated with the enemies of the American state turned out to be a lesser evil compared to the work of a non-American private military contractor in the region. Another way to avoid restrictions in the country of registration is to create subsidiaries in the country of operation, which technically isolates the contractual process from the jurisdiction of the country of registration. [10]

 

         Another mechanism for regulating the activities of PMCs is the conditions and laws of the private military services market.  PMCs refute working for customers of the "gray" market of private military services, such as governments of fragile states, terrorist and rebel groups, deliberate prolongation of military operations in order to increase their profits, cooperation with both sides of the conflict and the commission of crimes against human rights, since these actions contradict the principles and laws of the industry market. [7] The basic law of the industry can be formulated as follows: Any firm operating outside international humanitarian law, directly or indirectly violating human rights and other national/international laws, will suffer more reputational and financial losses in the long term than it can gain from illegal activities. Thus, PMCs automatically avoid such contracts.[4] An example of such a trend is the repeated refusal of Control Risks to cooperate with the Military Dictatorship of Burma, as this would cause a huge public outcry and destroy the reputation of the company. [12]

                  Given the huge financial resources of organized crime, dictatorships and terrorist organizations, there is a reliable probability that a short-term contract for such a customer will more than cover all possible potential losses in the future.[13] At the same time, no one can forbid PMCs to carry out such contracts covertly, disguising and redirecting how many times arms supplies, redirecting financial flows, thus keeping cooperation by customers from the "gray" market of private military services secret. 

            As a result, only public reaction at this stage is a deterrent in controlling the relationship between PMCs and their potential customers. Given the complexity of the private military services market, there are no other effective levers of influence besides public pressure. Laws make it possible to punish a company for working with unreliable actors, however, when it comes to national interest, the governments of countries turn a blind eye to some contracts. Reputation is the only important thing for companies in the white sector of military services (white contracts are often the most profitable in the long run) and the inclusion of PMCs in the list of unreliable ones can destroy the company. The disclosure of details of work from former employees of PMCs, journalistic investigations that make society think about the reliability and legality of the activities of individual PMCs determine their fate. A vivid example of this is the company's activities Academy, which was forced to change its name and registration three times due to a wave of public condemnation. The downside of a bad reputation is also that the company is losing a lot of potential high-quality operatives. Personnel starvation leads to a decrease in the quality of services, as well as the "uniqueness" of the service, which, in the conditions of a hypercompetitive military services market, turns out to be fatal for companies. 

 

         In conclusion, we note that regardless of the aspirations to comply with the norms of legislation on the part of the leadership of the PMCs, regardless of the desire of individual states to bring the activities of such companies into line with the norms of legislation, conscience and morality, the specifics of the activities of military companies are in the gray zone of public perception. On the one hand, in conditions of armed conflict, the blunders of state armies, which lead to the death of soldiers, cause a huge public outcry, and the mistakes of private companies affect society even more. Society has a persistent prejudice against PMCs, because the work of the media, public and private coverage of their activities can either destroy a company or make it a savior. Public opinion determines reputation, and reputation determines the survival of PMCs. To overcome the negative predisposition of society, PMCs must be extremely scrupulous about both the selection of operatives and the choice of clients, since any mistake leads to public discontent and, as a result, to the rupture of promising state. Contracts. 

The conditions of the armed conflict are replete with unforeseen situations in which the operational management of the PMCs is able to make decisions that are irrational from the point of view of morality and law, the actual lack of legal responsibility of the company for such incidents further unties the operatives' hands. The ore market is not formed thanks to PMCs, but rather for them. Former soldiers who have lost their reputations in their national armies or former rebels are willing to enter the private military industry in search of food. Their knowledge and experience are appreciated, but the reputational losses from their hiring far outweigh their practical benefits. PMCs have something to lose, namely reputation, future contracts, licenses. Therefore, the choice of unreliable customers is not a problem per se, the only question is to choose the company's further development strategy. 

 

         Bringing international legislation in the field of regulating the activities of Private military companies into line, establishing responsibility for non-conventional behavior at the corporate level can eliminate the negative impact of internal factors of PMCs on their image, as well as on the humanitarian and political aspects of life in conflicts where these companies operate.

References
1. Sokolov Roman Nikolaevich, Ryzhov Igor Valerievich, Rogozhina Evgenia Mikhailovna INFLUENCE OF EXTERNAL FACTORS ON THE SPECIFICS OF THE ACTIVITIES OF PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANIES WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE MILITARY SERVICES SYSTEM // Bulletin of IvSU. Series: Humanities. 2022. ¹3.
2. Bakker, Christine & Greijer, Susanna. (2011). Children's Rights: The Potential Impact of Private Military and Security Companies. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604555.003.0014.
3. Sokolov Roman Nikolaevich, Rogozhina Evgenia Mikhailovna, Ryzhov Igor Valerievich TECHNOLOGIES OF FUNCTIONING OF THE MARKET OF PRIVATE MILITARY SERVICES AND FEATURES OF INTERACTION CUSTOMER-PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANY // Conflictology / nota bene. 2022. ¹1.
4. Stewart, P. (2001, June). U.S. Pilots Summoned in Colombian Bombing Probe. Reuters
5. Fabricius, P. (2005, September). Private Security Firms Can End Africa’s Wars Cheaply. Saturday Star Johannesburg.
6. Carter, A.B. , & White, J.P. (2001). Keeping the Edge. Cambridge: MIT Press
7. Brooks, D. (2011). Write a Cheque, End a War: Using Private Military Companies to End African Conflicts. Conflict Trends, 6. Retrieved From http://www.accord.org.za/publications/ct6/issue6/htm
8. Cullen, J.P. (2011). Keeping the New Dog of War on a Tight Lease. Conflict Trends, 6. Retrieved from http://www.accord.org.za/publications/ct6/issue6/htm.
9. Wood, B. , & Peleman, J. (2009). The Arms Fixers (Report). Retrieved from PRIO website : https://www.prio.org/publications/658
10. Îò÷åò î âñòðå÷å Ìèíèñòðà èíîñòðàííûõ äåë Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè Ñ.Â.Ëàâðîâà ñ ïðåäñåäàòåëåì Ïîëèòáþðî ïàëåñòèíñêîãî äâèæåíèÿ ÕÀÌÀÑ È.Õàíèåé// ÌÈÄ ÐÔ [Ýëåêòðîííûé ðåñóðñ] Ðåæèì äîñòóïà: https://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/international_safety/regprla/-/asset_publisher/YCxLFJnKuD1W/content/id/4067332 (äàòà îáðàùåíèÿ: 8.11.2021)
11. Black, J.(1999). European Warfare. London, England: Macmillan.
12. Spicer, T. (1999). An Unorthodox Soldier: Peace And War And The Sandline Affair. Edinburgh: Mainstream Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/17a6d2d2f2ef7d3a5e118b19e40836ce/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=32579
13. School of the America’s Watch. (2021). Security report. Retrieved from http://www.soaw.org/
14. Shearer, D. (1998). Private Armies and Military Intervention (Adelphi Paper no. 316). Retrieved from International Institute for Strategic Studies.
15. Sokolov, R. N. Application of private military companies within the framework of the SVO in Ukraine: review / R. N. Sokolov, A. C Melnikov // Technologies of social and humanitarian research. - 2023. - ¹ 2(2). - S. 115-123.
16. Kurylev Konstantin, Ivkina Natalia THE UKRAINIAN EXPERIENCE OF USING PRIVATE MILITARY CAMPAIGNS // Post-Soviet studies. 2021. ¹1.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the peer–reviewed study is the dependence of the representation in the public consciousness of the activities of private military companies (hereinafter referred to as "PMCs") on the specifics of their internal organization. Given the active (and often very successful) use of PMCs in their own, as well as the prospects of these companies in the labor market highly appreciated by experts, the relevance of the article cannot be overestimated. As a methodological basis, the authors declared a systematic approach, a historical method and methods of event analysis. In the process of applying these methods, results with signs of scientific novelty were obtained. First of all, we are talking about the criteria developed by the authors for hiring PMCs employees. The authors' proposals on the legislative formalization of the activities of the companies under study are also of some interest. But as in the first part of the article, the main problem remains the correspondence of the title of the article to the goals and objectives of the study, as well as the results obtained. The authors say practically nothing about the public consciousness itself. And where it is still about public opinion and the representation of the activities of PMCs in the public consciousness, some general statements are simply postulated, and not proved, for example: "Within the framework of the armed conflict, the erroneous judgments and blunders of the state armies cause a huge public outcry ...". It is in this place that you expect a detailed argumentation, with references to sociological research or your own data, but this argumentation is missing. The article deals with the criteria for selecting employees in PMCs, the choice of a customer, the legal and "gray" activities of the companies under study, and much more. The only thing that is practically out of the question is the moral and ethical side of the PMCs' activities. Except for some marginalia in the margins, which are not proved, but postulated. The same applies to the realization of the research goal, which the authors set themselves: to establish a link between the internal factors of the PMCs and public opinion. The article says a lot about the internal factors of the PMCs' activities. There is practically nothing about how this activity is connected with its representation in the mass consciousness. Accordingly, the conclusion that was made for the first part of the article is also valid for the second: the reviewer failed to find a connection between the title of the article, its content, as well as those goals and objectives that the authors declared in the introduction. This implies the relevance and recommendations that were given to the authors in relation to the first part of the article: carefully consider what kind of scientific task they solved during the research, what was the purpose of this research, and which title of the article better reflects the essence of the research. Structurally, the work also raises questions. The following sections are highlighted in the text: - "Introduction", where the purpose of the study is formulated and the methodological choice is justified; - "Employees of Private military companies", where the "factor of PMCs employees" is analyzed, that is, the principles and criteria for selecting personnel for the companies under study; - "No restrictions on the choice of the customer", where the mechanisms for regulating the activities of PMCs are discussed; - the final part, which summarizes the results of the study. As in the first part, the weakest point of the article is its style. The text is replete with stylistic ones (for example, torture is not "used" by the authors, but "carried out"; or "a question" that raises "questions" in the sentence "The question of the legality of some groups raises questions"; or instead of the reinforcing word "much", the word "much" is used, which makes the following maxim strange: "in many more cases"; etc.) and grammatical (for example, incorrect spelling of the particle "neither" in the stable expression "oddly enough"; or the absence of a comma after introductory phrases "in this way", "based on", "as practice shows", etc.; or inconsistent sentences: "For Achieving this goal ..."; "The authors highlight the following main criteria ..."; "... This will eventually lead to the loss of a positive reputation, lawsuits and closure in the country of registration"; or the separate spelling of "not" with an adjective in the absence of opposition or dependent words: "... Or the use of non-conventional weapons"; or the absence of a comma before the subordinate clause: "From this we can conclude that ..."; or an error in the word "Ghost", as a result of which ghosts appear in the text: "…Regardless of the desire of individual states to match the ghost..."; in addition, the authors of the article have not been able to determine the correct spelling of the term "private military companies" – all spelling variants are found in the text: all words with a lowercase letter, all words with a capital letter, the first word with a capital letter, and the rest – with lowercase, etc.; etc.) errors. There are also completely unintelligible sentences like "Their knowledge and experience are appreciated, but would they be in demand if PMCs had access to other specialists or could they establish for certain who the candidate for joining their ranks is?" Although in general, the literacy of the second part of the article is slightly higher than the first. The use of terms is also far from ideal. So, the term "the factor of PMCs employees" used in the article is extremely vague. A factor is a cause that influences the process. What can be the reason for employees (not their specific qualities, educational characteristics, age, demographic characteristics, etc., namely employees as physical and social objects) of PMCs? There are many professional sociological and economic terms that allow us to describe what the authors are trying to say – from the concept of "quality of the workforce" to the term "personnel characteristics". But the authors do not use these well-established terms, but a very vague term "the factor of PMCs employees". Similar claims can be made with respect to some other terms. The bibliography includes 13 titles, including sources in foreign languages, and sufficiently represents the state of research on the subject of the article. The appeal to the opponents takes place in the introductory part of the article. GENERAL CONCLUSION: the article submitted for review can be qualified as a scientific work that meets the basic requirements for works of this kind. The results obtained by the authors will be interesting for political scientists, sociologists, conflict scientists, specialists in the field of public administration, as well as for students of the listed specialties. The presented material corresponds to the subject of the journal "Conflictology / nota bene". However, the article cannot be published in an up-to-date form. The text contains an unacceptably large number of grammatical and stylistic errors. In addition, the content of the text does not correspond to the title of the article. Due to the fact that the disadvantages of the second part of the article are almost identical to those of the first part (with the exception of theoretical and methodological reflection - it is available in the second part), the authors can only repeat the recommendations already expressed earlier: - to think over the content of the conducted research and choose the title of the article corresponding to this content; - carefully proofread the entire text in order to eliminate stylistic and grammatical errors; - formulate the scientific problem to which the work is devoted, think over the goals and objectives of the research. After eliminating these shortcomings, the article can be recommended for publication.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

A scientific article submitted for review on the topic: "The moral and ethical aspects of the activities of private military companies. Part 2." is an actual study. The relevance of the conducted research is justified. In particular, we can agree with the opinion of the authors that in the private military industry, the attitude of society towards each particular company plays a role more than in any other field and affects its reputation. The reviewed article is methodologically verified. It contains the necessary components of a research article, including the research methodology. The purpose of the study is to systematize the internal factors of the activities of private military companies and establish a correspondence between them and the public opinion formed under their influence towards PMCs and the industry as a whole. The approaches, research methods and the results obtained through their application are presented in detail and prescribed. Namely, a systematic approach was used as part of the study of the personnel structure of private military companies and the establishment of a relationship between the operational activities of PMCs and the state of personnel. General scientific methods of analysis and synthesis helped the authors to form a list of criteria relevant to the selection of an employee in the PMCs mission. The historical method and methods of event analysis in the context of internal factors made it possible to determine in many ways the reasons for the participation of PMCs in various missions, as well as the social and political consequences of such participation for private military companies. The authors' own research of public opinion among young people and middle-aged people deserves a positive assessment, the results of which correlate with national and global trends and patterns of evaluating the activities of PMCs in the media. They also analyzed the characteristics of the workforce of private military companies, the interdependence between the activities of PMCs employees, their past and biography, the pattern of military operations and how PMCs are perceived by society through the prism of mass media and publications on social networks. Among the results of the study, it should be highlighted: the mechanism for regulating the activities of PMCs, the level of public perception of PMCs, the most frequent and in-demand characteristics that determine the hiring of a potential PMC candidate, etc. The necessary conclusions have been drawn based on the results of the study. The analysis of the research source base showed that a sufficient number of scientific papers (16 positions in total) from different years were used in the preparation of the peer-reviewed article. The works of domestic and foreign authors are used. However, we believe that the authors failed to develop a scientific discussion within the framework of the research carried out. In general, the reviewed scientific article is interesting in terms of the formulation of the research problem and its content. It can arouse the reader's interest. Thus, based on the above, we believe that the peer-reviewed scientific article on the topic: "The moral and ethical aspects of the activities of private military companies. Part 2." meets, in general, the necessary requirements for this type of scientific work and it can be recommended for publication in the desired scientific journal.